Digital expulsions: Refugees’ carcerality and the technological disruptions of asylum

Abstract

Introducing the notion of “digital expulsions”, this paper argues that digital technologies in refugee humanitarianism are mainly used for hampering migrants from becoming asylum seekers and getting access to rights. Focusing on Greece, it explores which carceral mechanisms are enforced and sustained through the incorporation of digital technologies in refugee governmentality: it contends that it is key to investigate the specific harms that digital technologies generate on asylum seekers. The article intertwines scholarship on digital technologies in migration governance with carceral geography literature and shows that carceral mechanisms are enacted also through digital technologies. The paper draws attention to how in Greece asylum seekers’ access to the asylum procedure and to financial and humanitarian support is further obstructed due to forced technological intermediations. In the second part, it investigates refugees’ carcerality considering the increasing use of technology in refugee camps and in the asylum procedures: it contends that carceral mechanisms are enforced beyond detention and shows that these work by debilitating and choking refugees’ lives and stealing their lifetime.

Keywords

Digital expulsions refugees’ carcerality Greece asylum technological barriers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersson

(2014) Illegality, Inc: Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.

Aradau

(2022) Experimentality, surplus data and the politics of debilitation in borderzones. Geopolitics 27(1): 26–46.

Asylum in Europe (2021) Country report: Greece. Asylum Information Database. Available at: https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/AIDA-GR_2020update.pdf

Athanasiou

(2020) (Im) possible breathing: on courage and criticality in the ghostly historical present. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 23(2).

Bagaric

Hunter

Wolf

(2018) Technological incarceration and the end of the prison crisis. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973) 108(1): 73–135.

Bellanova

Glouftsios

(2022) Controlling the schengen information system (SIS II): the infrastructural politics of fragility and maintenance. Geopolitics 27(1): 160–184.

Boe

C S

(2020) Fighting Border Control in Three Sites of Confinement: Contestation and Visibility in Prison, Immigration Detention and Under Digital Confinement in New York. Champ pénal/Penal field (21) Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/champpenal/12273

Cacho

L M

(2012) Social death: Racialized rightlessness and the criminalization of the unprotected. New York: nyu Press.

Campesi

(2020) Genealogies of immigration detention: Migration control and the shifting boundaries between the ‘penal’and the ‘preventive’state. Social and Legal Studies 29(4): 527–548.

10.

CassidyGriffin

Wray

(2020) Labour, carcerality and punishment:‘Less-than-human’labour landscapes. Progress in Human Geography 44(6): 1081–1102.

11.

CoddingtonConlon

Martin

L L

(2020) Destitution economies: circuits of value in asylum, refugee, and migration control. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110(5): 1425–1444.

12.

De Genova

N P

(2002) Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31(1): 419–447.

13.

Foucault

(2021) Discipline and Punish. On the Birth of the Prison. Vintage.

14.

Foucault

(1998) The History of Sexuality: 1: The Will to Knowledge. UK: Penguin.

15.

Fouskas

(2020) Migrants, asylum seekers and refugees in Greece in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparative Cultural Studies-European and Latin American Perspectives 5(10): 39–58.

16.

Gidaris

(2020) Rethinking confinement through Canada’s alternatives to detention program. Incarceration 1(1): 2632666320936436.

17.

Gill

(2009) Governmental mobility: the power effects of the movement of detained asylum seekers around Britain’s detention estate. Political Geography 28(3): 186–196.

18.

Gill

Simon

(2020) Carceral journeys. In: The Handbook of Displacement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 329–343.

19.

Gill

Moran

(2016) Dialogues across carceral space: migration, mobility, space and agency. In: Carceral Spaces. London: Routledge, 251–260.

20.

Hardt

Mezzadra

(2020) Introduction: migrant projects of freedom. South Atlantic Quarterly 119(1): 168–175.

21.

Hiemstra

(2017) Periscoping as a feminist methodological approach for researching the seemingly hidden. The Professional Geographer 69(2): 329–336.

22.

Hiemstra

Conlon

(2017) Beyond privatization: bureaucratization and the spatialities of immigration detention expansion. Territory, Politics, Governance 5(3): 252–268.

23.

Hoffmann

(2017) Humanitarian security in Jordan’s Azraq camp. Security Dialogue 48(2): 97–112.

24.

Hyndman

(2004) Mind the gap: bridging feminist and political geography through geopolitics. Political Geography 23(3): 307–322.

25.

Iazzolino

(2021) Infrastructure of compassionate repression: making sense of biometrics in Kakuma refugee camp. Information Technology for Development 27(1): 111–128.

26.

Jacobsen

K L

(2015) Experimentation in humanitarian locations: UNHCR and biometric registration of Afghan refugees. Security Dialogue 46(2): 144–164.

27.

Jacobsen

Fast

(2019) Rethinking access: how humanitarian technology governance blurs control and care. Disasters 43: 151–168.

28.

Jasmontaite-Zaniewicz

Zomignani Barboza

(2021) Disproportionate surveillance: technology-assisted and automated decisions in asylum applications in the EU? International Journal of Refugee Law 33(1): 89–110.

29.

Khosravi

(2019) What do we see if we look at the border from the other side? Social Anthropology 27(3): 409–424.

30.

Khosravi

(2018) Stolen time. Radical Philosophy 2(3): 38–41.

31.

LeBaron

Roberts

(2010) Toward a feminist political economy of capitalism and carcerality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36(1): 19–44.

32.

LeeseNoori

Scheel

(2022) Data matters: the politics and practices of digital border and migration management. Geopolitics 27(1): 5–25.

33.

Lemberg-Pedersen

Haioty

(2020) Re-assembling the surveillable refugee body in the era of data-craving. Citizenship Studies 24(5): 607–624.

34.

Madianou

(2019) The biometric assemblage: surveillance, experimentation, profit, and the measuring of refugee bodies. Television and New Media 20(6): 581–599.

35.

Maillet

Mountz

Williams

(2018) Exclusion through imperio: entanglements of law and geography in the waiting zone, excised territory and search and rescue region. Social and Legal Studies 27(2): 142–163.

36.

Martin

(2021) Carceral economies of migration control. Progress in Human Geography 45(4): 740–757.

37.

Martin

Harker

(2020) Finance, Technology and Displacement: Towards a Research Agenda. London: Institute for Global Prosperity.

38.

Metcalfe

Dencik

(2019) The Politics of Big Borders: Data (in) Justice and the Governance of Refugees. First Monday, 24(4). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/9934/7749 (last accessed 1 September 2023).

39.

Mezzadra

Neilson

(2012) Between inclusion and exclusion: on the topology of global space and borders. Theory, Culture and Society 29(4–5): 58–75.

40.

McKeown

(2008) Melancholy Order: Asian Migration and the Globalization of Borders. New York: Columbia University Press.

41.

Minca

Rijke

Pallister-Wilkins

, et al. (2022) Rethinking the biopolitical: Borders, refugees, mobilities… EPC: Politics and Space C 40(1): 3–30.

42.

Molnar

(2020) Technological testing grounds: migration management experiments and reflections from the ground up. Available at: https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Technological-Testing-Grounds.pdf

43.

Monroy

(2021) New Camps in Greece: panopticon for refugees. DigitSite. Available at: https://digit.site36.net/2021/09/29/new-camps-in-greece-panoptikon-for-refugees/ (last accessed 30 November 2021).

44.

Moran

(2013) Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31(1): 174–190.

45.

Mountz

(2011) The enforcement archipelago: detention, haunting, and asylum on islands. Political Geography 30(3): 118–128.

46.

Mountz

Loyd

(2014) Constructing the Mediterranean region: obscuring violence in the bordering of Europe’s migration “crises”. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 13(2): 173–219.

47.

Mountz

Coddington

Catania

, et al. (2013) Conceptualizing detention: mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. Progress in Human Geography 37(4): 522–541.

48.

Neilson

Rossiter

(2021) More from less. Logistical Worlds 3: 7. Available at: https://logisticalworlds.org/blog/more-from-less-brett-neilson-and-ned-rossiter

49.

Novak

(2011) The flexible territoriality of borders. Geopolitics 16(4): 741–767.

50.

Peters

Turner

(2015) Between crime and colony: Interrogating (im) mobilities aboard the convict ship. Social and Cultural Geography 16(7): 844–862.

51.

Philo

(2014) ‘One must eliminate the effects of… diffuse circulation [and] their unstable and dangerous coagulation’: foucault and beyond the stopping of mobilities. Mobilities, 9(4): 493–511.

52.

Pinelli

(2019) Migranti e rifugiate. Antropologia, genere e politica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

53.

Puar

J K

(2021) Spatial debilities: slow life and carceral capitalism in palestine. South Atlantic Quarterly 120(2): 393–414.

54.

Reiter

Coutin

S B

(2017) Crossing borders and criminalizing identity: the disintegrated subjects of administrative sanctions. Law and Society Review 51(3): 567–601.

55.

Rothe

Rodriguez Lopez

(2021) Digital humanitarianism and the visual politics of the refugee camp:(Un) seeing control. International Political Sociology 15(1): 41–62.

56.

RSA (2021a) Greece deems Turkey “safe” but refugees are not. https://rsaegean.org/en/greece-deems-turkey-safe-but-refugees-are-not/ (last accessed 8 January 2022).

57.

RSA (2021b) The right to asylum in the context of “instrumentalisation_” – _lessons from Greece/. https://rsaegean.org/en/the-right-to-asylum-in-the-context-of-instrumentalisation-lessons-from-greece/ (last accessed 8 January 2022).

58.

SandvikJacobsen

KBKL

McDonald

(2017) Do no harm: a taxonomy of the challenges of humanitarian experimentation. International Review of the Red Cross 99(904): 319–344.

59.

Sassen

(2014) Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Harvard University Press.

60.

Scheel

(2018) Real fake? appropriating mobility via Schengen visa in the context of biometric border controls. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(16): 2747–2763.

61.

Spathopoulou

Carastathis

(2020) Hotspots of resistance in a bordered reality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38(6): 1067–1083.

62.

Squire

(2022) Data and displacement: assessing the practical and ethical implications of data-driven humanitarianism for internally displaced persons in camp-like settings. www.warwick.ac.uk/datadisplacement

63.

Stierl

(2021) The Mediterranean as a carceral seascape. Political Geography 88: 1–10.

64.

Tazzioli

(2022a) The technological obstructions of asylum: asylum seekers as forced techno-users and governing through disorientation. Security Dialogue 53(3): 202–219.

65.

Tazzioli

(2022b) Governing refugees through disorientation: fragmented knowledges and forced technological mediations. Review of International Studies 48(3): 425–440.

66.

Tazzioli

(2020) Governing migrant mobility through mobility: Containment and dispersal at the internal frontiers of Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38(1): 3–19.

67.

Vavoula

(2022) Digitalising the EU migration and asylum policy: a case study on information systems. In: Research Handbook on EU Migration and Asylum Law. Chelthenam: Edward Elgar Publishing, 114–139.

68.

Walters

(2020) Technologies of Deportation. In: The Handbook of Displacement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 237–254.

69.

Weitzberg

Schoemaker

(2021) Between surveillance and recognition: rethinking digital identity in aid. Big Data and Society 8(1): 20539517211006744.

70.

Welander

(2021) The politics of exhaustion and the externalization of British border control. an articulation of a strategy designed to deter, control and exclude. International Migration 59(3): 29–46.

71.

Witcher

(2021) Greece’s discriminatory migrant regime: volunteers, informal street-level bureaucrats, and moral rationalities. Journal of Refugee Studies 34(2): 1540–1559.

72.

Witteborn

(2022) Digitalization, digitization and datafication: the" three D" transformation of forced migration management. Communication, Culture and Critique 15(2): 157–175.