In this paper, we critically interrogate the registration of migrants in pan-European, large-scale biometric databases, like Eurodac (European Asylum Dactyloscopy Database). We employ the notion of “epidermal politics”, which analytically captures how human bodies – and skin in particular – become sites of identification, violent control, and contestation. Thinking through epidermal politics allows us to understand how the development of technologies that render skin visible and analysable, such as fingerprint scanners and biometric matching algorithms, are entangled in relations of power, structural racism, and subjugation. Drawing on the work of Simone Browne (2015) and her elaboration of Franz Fanon’s theory of epidermisation, we argue that migration control in Europe, and its violent and racialising effects, are embedded within data infrastructures that “stigmatise” (Van Der Ploeg 1999) post-colonial “others” with codes to control their mobilities. We unpack this argument in three stages. First, we discuss the governmental rationales that inform the use of Eurodac for the management of migration and asylum in Europe. Second, we discuss how biometric control is related to different forms of state violence, including deportation, prolonged detention, and physical violence associated with the forced registration of migrants’ fingerprints. Third, we attend to strategies employed by migrants to contest biometric control, focusing specifically on fingertip burning and mutilation, which we interpret as acts of dissent and self-determination to escape control. Overall, our goal is to emphasise the need to pay closer attention to dynamics of violence and racialisation that emerge at biometric and other kinds of “hi-tech” borders.
AasKF (2006) ‘The body does not lie’: identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal2(2): 143–158.
2.
AdeyP (2004) Surveillance at the Airport: surveilling mobility/mobilising surveillance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space36(8): 1365–1380.
3.
AmelungNGianollaCSolovovaO, et al. (2020) Technologies, infrastructures and migrations: material citizenship politics. Citizenship Studies24(5): 587–606.
4.
AmelungN (2021) ‘Crimmigration control’ across Borders: the convergence of migration and crime control through transnational biometric databases. Historical Social Research46(3): 151–177.
5.
AmooreL (2006) Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography25(3): 336–351.
6.
AmooreLHallA (2009) Taking People apart: digitised dissection and the body at the border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27(3): 444–464.
7.
AradauCCanzuttiL (2022) Asylum, borders, and the politics of violence: from suspicion to cruelty. Global Studies Quarterly2: 1–11. DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksab041.
8.
ArmentaA (2016) Racializing crimmigration: structural racism, colorblindness, and the institutional production of immigrant criminality. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity3(1): 82–95.
BellanovaRGlouftsiosG (2022) Controlling the schengen information system (SIS II): the infrastructural politics of fragility and maintenance. Geopolitics27(1): 160–184.
11.
BellanovaRIrionKJacobsenKL, et al. (2021) Toward a critique of algorithmic violence. International Political Sociology15(1): 121–150.
12.
BenjaminR (2019) Race after Technology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13.
BigoD (2010) Freedom and speed in enlarged borderzones. In SquireV. (ed.) The Contested Politics of Mobility. Borderzones and Irregularity. London and New York: Routledge.
14.
BirchallC (2021) Radical Secrecy: The Ends of Transparency in Datafied America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
BondittiP (2004) From territorial space to networks: A Foucauldian approach to the implementation of biometry. Alternatives29(4): 465–482.
16.
BrekkeJPBrochmannG (2015) Stuck in transit: secondary migration of asylum seekers in europe, national differences, and the dublin regulation. Journal of Refugee Studies28(2): 145–162.
17.
BroedersDHampshireJ (2013) Dreaming of seamless borders: ICTs and the pre-emptive governance of mobility in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(8): 1201–1218.
18.
BrowneS (2015) Dark Matters. On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
19.
ButlerJ (2004) Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.
20.
CampesiG (2018) Seeking asylum in times of crisis: reception, confinement, and detention at Europe’s Southern Border. Refugee Survey Quarterly37(1): 44–70.
21.
CaplanJTorpeyJ (2001) Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
22.
CasagliaA (2020) Interpreting the Politics of Borders. In ScottJ (ed.) A Research Agenda for Border Studies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 27–42.
23.
ColeSA (2001) Suspect Identities. A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Council of the European Union (2014) Best Practices for upholding the Obligation in the Eurodac Regulation to take fingerprints. Document DS 1491/14.
25.
De GenovaN (2017) The Borders of ‘Europe’: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
26.
De GenovaN (2018) The “migrant crisis” as racial crisis: do Black Lives Matter in Europe?Ethnic and Racial Studies41(10): 1765–1782.
27.
DempseyKE (2020) Spaces of violence: A typology of the political geography of violence against migrants seeking asylum in the EU. Political Geography79: 102157, Doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102157.
28.
DijstelbloemHWaltersW (2019) Atmospheric Border Politics: The Morphology of Migration and Solidarity Practices in Europe. Geopolitics26(2): 497–520.
29.
DijstelbloemH (2021) Borders as Infrastructure: The Technopolitics of Border Control. MA: MIT University Press.
GlouftsiosGScheelS (2021) An inquiry into the digitisation of border and migration management: performativity, contestation and heterogeneous engineering. Third World Quarterly42(1):123–140.
46.
GlouftsiosG (2021) Engineering Digitised Borders. Designing and Managing the Visa Information System. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
JacobsenKL (2015) Experimentation in humanitarian locations: UNHCR and biometric registration of Afghan refugees. Security Dialogue46(2): 144–164.
49.
JonesR (2016) Violent Borders. Refugees and the Right to Move. London and New York: Verso.
50.
KaufmannVBergmanMMJoyeD (2004) Motility: mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(4): 745–756.
51.
LeeseM (2016) Exploring the Security/Facilitation Nexus: Foucault at the ‘Smart’ Border. Global Society30(3): 412–429.
52.
LeeseM (2022) Fixing State Vision: Interoperability, Biometrics, and Identity Management in the EU, Geopolitics27(1): 113–133.
53.
MagnetSA (2011) When Biometrics Fail. Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
54.
MaguireM (2009) The birth of biometric security. Anthropology Today. 25(2): 9–14.
55.
M’charekASchrammKSkinnerD (2014) Topologies of Race: Doing territory, population and identity in Europe. Science, Technology, & Human Values39(4): 468–487.
MetcalfeP (2022) Autonomy of Migration and the Radical Imagination: Exploring Alternative Imaginaries within a Biometric Border. Geopolitics27(1): 47–69.
Pallister-WilkinsP (2021) Saving the souls of white folk: Humanitarianism as white supremacy. Security Dialogue, 52(1_suppl): 98–106.
66.
PapadopulosDStephensonNTsianosV (2008) Escape Routes: Control and Subversion in the Twenty-First Century. London, UK: Pluto Press.
67.
PapadopoulosDTsianosV (2013) After citizenship: Autonomy of migration, organisational ontology and mobile commons. Citizenship Studies17(2): 178–196.
68.
PelizzaA (2021) Identification as translation: The art of choosing the right spokespersons at the securitised border. Social Studies of Science51(4): 487–511.
69.
PuglieseJ (2010) Biometrics. Bodies, Technologies, Biopolitics. New York, NY: Routledge.
RobinsonBKenyonP (2020) Border Force Staff ‘will Face Violence’ when Fingerprinting Migrants. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-52936239. (last accessed 9 11 2022).
72.
SalterM (2003) Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations. London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
73.
ScheelS (2013) Autonomy of migration despite its securitisation? Facing the terms and conditions of biometric rebordering. Millennium: Journal of International Studies41(3): 575–600.
74.
ScheelS (2019) Autonomy of Migration? Appropriating Mobility within Biometric Border Regimes. London and New York: Routledge.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
77.
ShellerM (2016) Uneven mobility futures: a foucauldian approach. Mobilities. 11(1), pp. 15–31.
78.
SontowskiS (2018) Speed, timing and duration: contested temporalities, techno-political controversies and the emergence of the EU’s smart border, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(16): 2730–2746.
79.
StierlM (2019) Migrant Resistance in Contemporary Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
80.
TazzioliM (2018) Containment through mobility: migrants’ spatial disobediences and the reshaping of control through the hotspot system. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(16): 2764–2779.
81.
TazzioliM (2021) The making of racialised subjects: Practices, history, struggles. Security Dialogue52(1): 107–114.
82.
TorpeyJ (2000) The Invention of the Passport. Surveillance, Citizenship and the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83.
TrauttmansdorffPFeltU (2021) Between infrastructural experimentation and collective imagination: the digital transformation of the EU border regime. Science, Technology, & Human Values016224392110575. DOI: 10.1177/01622439211057523.
84.
Van Der PloegI (1999) The illegal body: “Eurodac” and the politics of biometric identification. Ethics and Information Technology1: 295–302.
85.
Van der PloegI (2003) Biometrics and the body as information: normative issues of the socio-technical coding of the body. In LyonD. (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting. Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. London and New York: Routledge.
