The paper analyses how the discourse on climate governance is re-worked in the urban context. It does so in order to better understand the meaning and possible impact of a growing rhetoric that proclaims the leadership in terms of climate governance of cities that are transitioning towards sustainable futures. By using an approach that employs critical discourse analysis, it examines the institutional climate governance discourse issued by public and private actors in the city of Barcelona, and compares it with the locally-contextualised discourses issued by these same actors during the Car-Free Day campaigns in 2005, 2012 and 2015. The objective is to analyse if private and public discourses internalise and take on the city’s leadership discourse and transfer it to urban climate governance. The comparative examination of texts released by public and private actors points to the discursive strategies of climate governance at the city level taking on meanings that are more descriptive than normative. The paper claims that this has implications for expectations regarding the city’s leadership in transitions towards sustainable futures.
BanisterD (2011) Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography19(6): 1538–1546. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009.
2.
BaroneMJMiyazakiATaylorKA, et al. (2000) The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science28(2): 248–262.
3.
BolsenTDruckmanJNCookFL, et al. (2014) The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior36(2): 235–262. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0.
4.
BosomworthK (2018) A discursive-institutional perspective on transformative governance: A case from a fire management policy sector. Environmental Policy and Governance28: 415–425. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1806.
BulkeleyH (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources35(1): 229–253. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747.
7.
BulkeleyH (2017) Cities and governance. In: SuttoMP (ed.) Urban Climate Change Crossroads. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 29–38. DOI: 10.4324/9781315548906.
8.
CarvalhoA (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science16(2): 223–243. DOI: 10.1177/0963662506066775.
ChristensenLTMorsingMThyssenO, et al. (2015) Discursive closure and discursive openings in sustainability. Management Communication Quarterly29(1): 135–144. DOI: 10.1177/0893318914563574.
11.
CoffeyDJJosephPH (2012) A polarized environment: the effect of partisanship and ideological values on individual recycling and conservation behavior. American Behavioral Scientist57(1): 116–139. DOI: 10.1177/0002764212463362.
12.
Corfee-MorlotJKamal-chaouiLDonovanMG, et al. (2009) Climate Change and Multilevel Governance. Paris: OECD Environment Working Papers.
13.
DewulfA (2013) Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change4(4): 321–330. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.227.
14.
DobersPSpringettD (2010) Corporate social responsibility: discourse, narratives and communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management17(2). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 63–69. DOI: 10.1002/csr.231.
15.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
16.
HodsonMMarvinS (2010) Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?Research Policy39(4): 477–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020.
JuholaSKeskitaloECHWesterhoffL, et al. (2011) Understanding the framings of climate change adaptation across multiple scales of governance in Europe. Environmental Politics20(4): 445–463. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.589571.
19.
KooimanJBavinckMChuenpagdeeR, et al. (2008) Interactive governance and governability: an introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies7(1): 1–11.
20.
McCrightAMDunlapRE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the american public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly52(2): 155–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
21.
MuellerNRojas-RuedaDKhreisH, et al. (2020) Changing the urban design of cities for health: the superblock model. Environment International134. 105–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105132.
22.
NewellPBulkeleyHTurnerK, et al. (2015) Governance traps in climate change politics: Re-framing the debate in terms of responsibilities and rights. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change6(6): 535–540. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.356.
23.
NisbetECHartPSMyersT, et al. (2013) Attitude change in competitive framing environments? open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication63(4): 766–785. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12040.
24.
OkerekeCBulkeleyHSchroederH, et al. (2009) Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics9(1): 58–78. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.58.
25.
OliveiraACapriottiP (2014) Internet as a key tool for publics to communicate with organizations. the case of the Spanish energy sector. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies6(1): 143–151. DOI: 10.1386/cjcs.6.1.143_1.
26.
OrtasEMoseñeJA (2011) Sostenibilidad en tiempos de crisis, ¿una apuesta al fracaso o un valor en alza? Evidencia del sector energético Español. Revista de Contabilidad14(SUPPL1): 299–320. DOI: 10.1016/S1138-4891(11)70036-X.
27.
OrtizEMarinS (2014) Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) as recognized guidelines for sustainability reporting by Spanish companies on the IBEX 35: Homogeneity in their framework and added value in the relationship with financial entities. Intangible Capital10(5): 855–872.
28.
SalaMFarréMTorresT, et al. (2014) El ciclo económico de Cataluña. Un análisis comparativo con la Unión Económica y Monetaria. Cuadernos de Economía37: 169–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.cesjef.2014.07.001.
29.
SchultzFCastellóIMorsingM, et al. (2013) The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: a communication view. Journal of Business Ethics115(4): 681–692. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8.
30.
SenSBhattacharyaCBKorschunD (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34(2): 158–166.
31.
SinghJDe Los Salmones SanchezMDMGDel BosqueIR, et al. (2008) Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: a cross-cultural evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics80(3): 597–611. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9457-6.
32.
WindsorD (2013) Corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility: a positive theory approach. Journal of Business Research66(10): 1937–1944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.016.
