Debates ranging from parental leave within universities to abortion rights, ‘anchor babies,’ racialized maternal mortality, and the continued disproportionate role of indigenous children within foster care systems demonstrate the wide range of politics informed by fertility. In this paper, I aim to prompt further academic research and personal reflection about the politics that underpin questions about fertility and the life course. There is an analytic potential and political urgency to understand these debates under the conceptual umbrella of ‘political geographies of fertility,’ as matters of fertility cross disciplinary and subdisciplinary boundaries and are – literally – matters of life and death. In this paper, I argue for framing fertility as a continued state of being, an anticipatory weight, that influences lives, behaviors, and politics at a variety of scales, from the border and the nation-state to academic workplaces and the body. By considering the range of spaces and scales where the politics of fertility take shape, I hope to encourage future researchers to devote attention to what gets made political through fertility – including but not limited to the biological events of reproduction.
BaileyAJ (2009) Population geography: Lifecourse matters. Progress in Human Geography33(3): 407–418. DOI: 10.1177/0309132508096355.
3.
BhattacharjeeD (2018) “It is a jail which does not let us be …”: negotiating spaces of commercial surrogacy by reproductive labourers in India. In: EnglandMFanninM, andHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.106–121.
4.
BoyleP (2003) Population geography: Does geography matter in fertility research?Progress in Human Geography27(5): 615–626.
5.
CalkinS (2019) Towards a political geography of abortion. Political Geography69: 22–29.
6.
ClarkGL (2005) Money flows like mercury: The geography of global finance. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography87(2): 99–112.
7.
Coddington, K. (2020). Incompatible with life: Embodied borders, migrant fertility, and the UK’s ‘hostile environment’. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420968112.
8.
CollardJ (2018) Biological reproduction, respatialized: Conceiving abnormality in a biotech age. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.31–47.
9.
CollsRFanninM (2013) Placental surfaces and the geographies of bodily interiors. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space45(5): 1087–1104.
10.
CullenD (2018) Race, debt and empire: Racialising the newfoundland financial crisis of 1933. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43(4): 689–702.
11.
DahlmanC (2018) National pasts and biopolitical futures in Serbia. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 184–200.
12.
DavisA (1998) Surrogates and outcast mothers: Racism and reproductive politics in the nineties. lewis. In: JamesJ (ed.) The Angela Davis Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp.210–221.
DoddsK-J (1994) Eugenics, fantasies of empire and inverted Whiggism: An essay on the political geography of Vaughan Cornish. Political Geography13(1): 85–99.
15.
EnglandM (2018) Right donor, right place: Spatialities of artificial insemination. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.48–66.
FanninM (2018) Making an “embryological vision of the world”: Law, maternity and the Kyoto collection. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.17–30.
20.
FindlayAMGrahamE (1991) The challenge facing population geography. Progress in Human Geography15(2): 149–162.
21.
GinsburgFRappR (1991) The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology20(1): 311–343.
22.
GrahamE (2004) The past, present and future of population geography: Reflections on Glenn Trewartha’s address fifty years on. Population, Space and Place10(4): 289–294.
23.
GreenhalghS (1996) The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography. Comparative Studies in Society and History38(1): 26–66.
24.
HarawayDJ (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Experimental Futures: technological Lives, Scientific Arts, Anthropological Voices. Durham: Duke University Press.
25.
HarrisC (1992) Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review106(8): 1707.
26.
HazenH (2018) The best of both worlds? Mothers’ narratives around birth centre experiences in the twin cities, Minnesota. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.122–141.
27.
HeynenN (2009) Bending the bars of empire from every ghetto for survival: The black panther party’s radical antihunger politics of social reproduction and scale.Annals of the Association of American Geographers99(2): 406–422.
28.
Hiemstra, N. (2021). Mothers, babies, and abortion at the border: Contradictory US policies, or targeting fertility?. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://doi.org/10.1117/2399654421998368.
29.
HooverECookKPlainR, et al. (2012) Indigenous peoples of North America: Environmental exposures and reproductive justice. Environmental Health Perspectives120(12): 1645–1649.
30.
Hughes, S. M. (2021). “Wait for a permanent contract”: The temporal politics of (in) fertility as an early career researcher. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654421994852.
31.
KaiserR (2018) Birth and biopolitics: Maternity migration, birthright citizenship and domopolitics in Hong Kong. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.161–183.
32.
KatzC (2018) The angel of geography: Superman, tiger mother, aspiration management, and the child as waste*. Progress in Human Geography42(5): 723–740.
33.
Kaufman, E. C. (2021). Staying with the trouble of collegiality, professionalism and care: Fertilities in academia. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211014198.
34.
KearnsRA (1997) Narrative and metaphor in health geographies. Progress in Human Geography21(2): 269–277.
35.
KlimpelJWhitsonR (2016) Birthing modernity: spatial discourses of cesarean birth in São Paulo, Brazil. Gender, Place & Culture23(8): 1207–1220.
36.
LaveryC (2016) Situating eugenics: Robert DeCourcy ward and the immigration restriction league of Boston. Journal of Historical Geography53: 54–62.
LewisS (2018a) Cyborg uterine geography: Complicating ‘care’ and social reproduction. Dialogues in Human Geography8(3): 300–316.
39.
LewisS (2018b) International solidarity in reproductive justice: Surrogacy and gender-inclusive polymaternalism. Gender, Place & Culture25(2): 207–227.
40.
LongJC (2006) Border anxiety in Palestine-Israel. Antipode38(1): 107–127.
41.
LonghurstR (2008) Maternities: Gender, Bodies and Space. London: Routledge.
42.
LonghurstR (2018) Thinking geographically with wombs. Dialogues in Human Geography8(3): 320–323.
43.
MansfieldB (2012) Environmental health as biosecurity: “Seafood choices,” risk, and the pregnant woman as threshold. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(5): 969–976.
44.
McNivenA (2016) Pregnancy loss, skin-based body modifications and agency. Women: A Cultural Review27(2): 202–219.
45.
MerkleK (2018) “Here we are!” exploring academic spaces of pregnant graduate students. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.91–105.
46.
Mitchell-Eaton, E. (2020). Postpartum geographies: Intersections of academic labor and care work. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420953518.
47.
MüllerMSchurrC (2016) Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41(3): 217–229.
48.
MurphyM (2017) The Economization of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
49.
NastHJ (2017a) Into the arms of dolls: Japan’s declining fertility rates, the 1990s financial crisis and the (maternal) comforts of the posthuman. Social & Cultural Geography18(6): 758–785.
NastHJ (2018) Uterine imaginaries, geopolitical economy, and the maternal/unconscious. Dialogues in Human Geography8(3): 328–332.
52.
NoxoloPRaghuramPMadgeC (2008) Geography is pregnant’ and ‘geography’s milk is flowing’: Metaphors for a postcolonial discipline?Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26(1): 146–168.
53.
PriceK (2010) What is reproductive justice?: how women of color activists are redefining the pro-choice paradigm. Meridians10(2): 42–65.
54.
Rivera-AmarilloCCamargoA (2020) Zika assemblages: Women, populationism, and the geographies of epidemiological surveillance. Gender, Place & Culture27(3): 412–428.
55.
RobbinsP (1998) Population and pedagogy: The geography classroom after Malthus. Journal of Geography97(6): 241–252.
56.
RobbinsPSmithSH (2017) Baby bust: towards political demography. Progress in Human Geography41(2): 199–219.
57.
RobertsD (1997) Killing the Black Body. Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Pantheon Books.
58.
SasserJ (2018) On Infertile Ground: Population Control and Women’s Rights in the Era of Climate Change. New York: New York University Press.
59.
SchlosserK (2009) Malthus at mid-century: Neo-Malthusianism as bio-political governance in the post-WWII United States. Cultural Geographies16(4): 465–484.
60.
SchurrC (2017) From biopolitics to bioeconomies: The ART of (re-)producing white futures in Mexico’s surrogacy market. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(2): 241–262.
61.
SchurrC (2018) The baby business booms: Economic geographies of assisted reproduction. Geography Compass12(8): e12395.
62.
SchurrCMilitzE (2018) The affective economy of transnational surrogacy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(8): 1626–1645.
63.
SilveyR (2004) On the boundaries of a subfield: Social theory’s incorporation into population geography. Population, Space and Place10(4): 303–308.
SmithDP (2018) Population geography I: Human trafficking. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 297–308.
66.
SmithDP (2019) Population geography II: The r/age of migration. Progress in Human Geography43(4): 729–738.
67.
SportonD (1999) Mixing methods in fertility research. The Professional Geographer51(1): 68–76.
68.
StrochCNussinsonRMentserS, et al. (2019) Heavy of mouth” and “heavy of tongue”: Weight as a conceptual metaphor of disability. Metaphor and Symbol34(4): 197–208.
69.
TrewarthaGT (1953) A case for population geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers43(2): 71–97.
70.
TylerI (2010) Designed to fail: A biopolitics of British citizenship. Citizenship Studies14(1): 61–74.
71.
TynerJA (2010) The geopolitics of eugenics and the exclusion of Philippine immigrants from the United states. Geographical Review89(1): 54–73.
72.
TynerJA (2013) Population geography I: Surplus populations. Progress in Human Geography37(5): 701–711.
73.
TynerJA (2015) Population geography II: Mortality, premature death, and the ordering of life. Progress in Human Geography39(3): 360–373.
74.
TynerJA (2016) Population geography III: Precarity, dead peasants, and truncated life. Progress in Human Geography40(2): 275–289.
75.
Van KriekenR (2004) Rethinking cultural genocide: Aboriginal child removal and settler‐colonial state formation. Oceania75(2): 125–151.
76.
WangSH (2017) Fetal citizens? Birthright citizenship, reproductive futurism, and the “panic” over Chinese birth tourism in Southern California. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(2): 263–280.
77.
WhitsonR (2018) My germs, my space, my stuff, my smells”: Homebirth as a site of spatialised resistance in Appalachian Ohio. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, pp.142–158.
