This paper advances the understanding of the politics of governing energy for development projects by non-state actors. Building on Tania Murray Li’s work on trusteeship, and drawing on governmentality studies, along with ethnographic insights from two low carbon energy projects, this paper illuminates two less examined aspects of politics of energy projects. First, the designs of these projects embed particular imagined subjects, and specific techniques, to afford governance. In particular, trustees use techniques of expertise, techniques of legitimacy, and techniques of subjectivity. Second, trusteeship is a contingent phenomenon as a clear line between trustees and subjects is often missing. Many actors, simultaneously trustees and subjects, also carry socio-cultural subjectivities of class, caste and gender, which complicates the conduct of conduct. Some trustees look for benefiting people, some for profits, some to make a political career and, yet others, to support their social groups. By engaging with trusteeship, the paper flags that the governance techniques do not always benefit the ‘beneficiaries’ and are often counterproductive. The article emerges from nine-month ethnographic research done in 2012–13 in five villages in India using participant observations, interviews and group discussion, in addition to analysis of project websites and documentary materials.
AllsobrookCBoisenC, (2017)
Two types of trusteeship in South Africa: From subjugation to separate development. Politikon44(2): 265–285.
2.
BebbingtonA (2010)
Trusteeship, ethnography, and the challenge of critique in/of development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers100(1): 229–232.
3.
BendixD (2016)
The colonial present in international development? The case of German interventions in obstetric care in Tanzania. Progress in Development Studies16(3): 229–243.
4.
BoisenC (2017)
From land dispossession to land restitution: European land rights in South Africa. Settler Colonial Studies7(3): 321–339.
BridgeGBouzarovskiSBradshawM, et al. (2013)
Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy53: 331–340.
7.
BulkeleyHCastán BrotoV (2013)
Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(3): 361–375.
8.
CavanaghCJ (2017)
Anthropos into humanitas: Civilizing violence, scientific forestry, and the ‘dorobo question’ in Eastern Africa. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(4): 694–713.
9.
ChatterjeeP (2004) The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
10.
ComelloSDReichelsteinSJSahooA, et al. (2017)
Enabling mini-grid development in rural India. World Development93: 94–107.
11.
CowenMPShentonRW (1996) Doctrines of Development.
Abingdon, UK:
Taylor & Francis.
da CostaD (2010)
Introduction: Relocating culture in development and development in culture. Third World Quarterly31(4): 501–522.
14.
DaviesG (2018)
Clean energy product markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: Complex market devices and power asymmetries. Energy Research & Social Science42: 80–89.
15.
DeanM (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed.
London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi:
SAGE Publications.
16.
DomoshM (2018)
Race, biopolitics and liberal development from the Jim Crow South to postwar Africa. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43(2): 312–324.
HallS (1990) Cultural identity and diaspora. In: RutherfordJ (ed.) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference.
London:
Lawrence & Wishart, pp.222–237.
19.
HarrisR (2008)
Development and hybridity made concrete in the colonies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space40(1): 15–36.
20.
HartG (2006)
D/developments after the meltdown. Antipode82(7): 282.
21.
JazeelT (2006)
Postcolonial geographies of privilege: Diaspora space, the politics of personhood and the ‘Sri Lankan women’s association in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31(1): 19–33.
22.
JollySRavenRRomijnH (2012)
Upscaling of business model experiments in off-grid PV solar energy in India. Sustainability Science7(2): 199–212.
23.
LeggS (2007) Spaces of Colonialism: Delhi’s Urban Governmentalities. Spaces of Colonialism: Delhi’s Urban Governmentalities.
Malden/Oxford/Victoria:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
24.
LeynseeleYV (2018)
White belonging and brokerage at a South African rural frontier. Ethnos83(5): 868–887.
25.
LiTM (2005)
Beyond ‘the state’ and failed schemes. American Anthropologist107(3): 383–394.
LiTM (2007b)
Practices of assemblage and community Forest management. Economy and Society36(2): 263–293.
28.
LiTM (2007c) The Will to Improve.
Duke/London:
Duke University Press.
29.
McEwanC (2017)
Spatial processes and politics of renewable energy transition: Land, zones and frictions in South Africa. Political Geography56: 1–12.
30.
MitraSK (2005) The Puzzle of India’s Governance: Culture, Context and Comparative Theory.
London/New York:
Routledge.
31.
NaylorL (2017)
Auditing the subjects of fair trade: Coffee, development, and surveillance in highland Chiapas. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(5): 816–835.
