This epilogue provides a ‘last word’ to this rich collection of papers engaging in lively dialogue with Wittfogel’s ghost. It suggests that although his writing has been criticised as deterministic and generalising, with hindsight, Wittfogel is best appreciated as a scholar thinking within a particular historical and intellectual context. Part of the abiding appeal of his perspective comes from the clear and strong lines it draws connecting water, infrastructure and power.
Féaux de la CroixJ (2012) Moving metaphors we live by: Water and flow in the social sciences and around hydroelectric dams in Kyrgyzstan. In: ReevesM (ed) Movement, Power and Place in Central Asia and Beyond: Contested Trajectories.
Thirdworlds. London:
Routledge, pp.129–144.
8.
GellA (1992) The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In: CooteJSheltonA (eds) Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics.
Oxford:
Clarendon Press, pp.40–63.
9.
GuptaA (2012) Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
10.
HarveyPBruun JensenCMoritaA (eds) (2017) Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion.
London:
Routledge.
11.
HarveyPKnoxH (2010) Abstraction, materiality and the ‘science of the concrete’ in engineering practice. In: BennettTJoyceP (eds) Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn.
London:
Routledge, pp.124–141.
12.
Harvey P and Knox H (2012) The enchantments of infrastructure. Mobilities 7(4): 521–536.
13.
HocartAM (1970 [1936]) Kings and Councillors: An Essay in the Comparative Anatomy of Human Society.
Chicago, IL and London:
University of Chicago Press.
14.
KopninaHWashingtonW (eds) (2020) People and Parks: Integrating Social and Ecological Justice.
New York and London:
Springer.
15.
KrauseF (2018)
Water power, anthropologically speaking.Social Anthropology26(3): 414–420.
16.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
17.
MorphyH (2013) Art as action: The Yolngu. In: ShoreCTrnkaS (eds) Up Close and Personal: On Peripheral Perspectives and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge.
New York:
Berghahn, pp.125–139.
18.
PolanyiK (1957) The Great Transformation.
Boston, MA:
Beacon Press.
19.
StrangV (2011) Fluid forms: Owning water in Australia. In: StrangVBusseM (eds) Ownership and Appropriation. ASA monograph.
Oxford and New York:
Berg, pp.171–195.
20.
StrangV (2014)
Fluid consistencies: Meaning and materiality in human engagements with water.Archaeological Dialogues21(2): 133–150.
21.
StrangV (2016)
Infrastructural relations: Water, political power and the rise of a new ‘despotic regime. Water Alternatives, Special Issue. Water, Infrastructure and Political Rule9(2): 292–318.
22.
TsingA (2004) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connections.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
23.
WittfogelK (1967 [1957]) Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. 6th ed.
New Haven, CT and London:
Yale University Press.
