The space of the municipal library is changing. Libraries are no longer the traditional haven for quiet contemplation. In many cities across North America and the UK, municipal libraries have become a central social hub, a social service provider and a place of shelter for the marginal. In combination with technological advances and the hovering threat of budget cuts, the space of the library and the multiple publics it serves has becoming increasingly debated. We argue that the library and its changing mandate can be usefully understood through a property lens. The library is not only public space, we argue, but also public property. The manner in which the library, as public property, is enacted, is complicated most immediately by the competing conceptions of the ‘public’ that the library is to serve, but also by the ambivalent relationship between the ‘public’ and the ‘private’, and by the spatiality of the library itself. We demonstrate these complications in the context of changes to the sleeping policy in the Edmonton Public Library in Alberta, Canada (2014–2015).
AaboSAudunsonR (2012)
Use of library space and the library as place.Library & Information Science Research34(2): 138–149.
2.
AlexanderGPeñalverE (2012) An Introduction to Property Theory.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
3.
AlstadCCurryA (2003)
Public space, public discourse, and public libraries.Libres: Library and Information Society Research e-Journal13(1): 20p.
4.
AudunsonR (2005)
The public library as a meeting-place in a multicultural and digital context: The necessity of low-intensive meeting-places.Journal of Documentation61(3): 429–441.
5.
BlomleyN (2011a) Rights of Passage: Sidewalks and the Regulation of Public Flow.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
6.
BlomleyN (2011b)
Cuts, flows, and the geographies of property.Law, Culture, and the Humanities7(2): 203–216.
7.
BlomleyN (2013)
Performing property, making the world.Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence27(1): 23–48.
8.
BlomleyN (2016) The right not to be excluded: Common property and the right to stay put. In: AminAHowellP (eds) Releasing the Commons.
Abingdon:
Routledge, pp. 89–106.
9.
BougheyACooperM (2010)
Public libraries: Political vision versus public demand?Perspectives62(2): 175–201.
10.
BrewsterL (2014)
The public library as therapeutic landscape: A qualitative case study.Health & Place2: 94–99.
11.
Canadian Broadcast Corporation (2016) Edmonton Public Library targets homeless, bans sleeping in the stacks, 15 April 2015. Available at: www.cbc.ca/radio (accessed 30 April, 2015)
12.
ClarkM (2012)
Becoming public: Library design and the creation of public space.Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management8: 2–13.
13.
DainP (1996)
American public libraries and the third sector: Historical reflections and implications.Libraries & Culture31(1): 56–84.
14.
Edmonton Public Library (EPL) (2015) Community-led service philosophy toolkit. Edmonton Public Library, 7 December. EPL.ca.
15.
EvjenSAudunsonR (2009)
The complex library: Do the public’s attitudes represent a barrier to institutional change in public libraries?New Library World110(3/4): 161–174.
16.
FrederiksenL (2015)
“Our public library”: Social reproduction and urban public space in Toronto. Women’s Studies International Forum48: 141–153.
17.
GehnerJ (2010)
Libraries, low-income people, and social exclusion.Public Library Quarterly29(1): 39–47.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
20.
HassT (2004)
The public sphere as a sphere of publics: Rethinking Habermas’s theory of the public sphere.Journal of Communication54(1): 178–184.
21.
HodgettsDStolteOChamberlainKet al. (2008)
A trip to the library: Homelessness and social inclusion.Social & Cultural Geography9(8): 933–953.
22.
HodkinsonS (2010)
The new urban enclosures.City16(5): 500–518.
23.
HolleyRP (2014)
Library planning and budgeting: A few underappreciated principles.Journal of Library Administration54(8): 720–729.
24.
IrwinB (2012)
The value of a communitarian approach to public library board governance: Rejecting current neoliberal practice.The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science36(1): 1–15.
25.
JeffreyA (2013) The Improvised State: Sovereignty, Performance and Agency in Dayton Bosnia.
Oxford:
Royal Geographical Society Book Series Wiley-Blackwell.
26.
KellyBHamasuCJonesB (2012)
Applying return on investment (ROI) in libraries.Journal of Library Administration52(8): 656–671.
27.
KoizumiM (2014)
Transitions in public library management: From the international perspective of strategy, organizational structure, and operations.Journal of Library Administration54(8): 659–690.
28.
KrpicT (2007)
Libraries: Creating public service and public space for the future, Javnost – the public.Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture14(4): 89–101.
29.
LayardA (2010)
Shopping in the public realm: A law of place.Journal of Law and Society 17(3): 412–441.
30.
LayardA (2016)
Public space: Property, lines, interruptions.Journal of Law, Property and Society2(1): 1–47.
31.
LeckieG (2004)
Three perspectives on libraries as public space. Feliciter50(6): 233–236.
32.
LeckieGJHopkinsJ (2002)
The public place of central libraries: Findings from Toronto and Vancouver.The Library Quarterly72(3): 326–372.
33.
LeesL (1997)
Ageographia, heterotopia, and Vancouver’s new public library.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15(3): 321–347.
34.
Libraries Act (2007) Province of Alberta. Revised Statues of Alberta 2000. Chapter L-11 (1.0–1.12, Municipal Libraries), 4 October.
35.
Macpherhson CB (1987) Property, Mainstream and Critical Perspectives. University of Toronto; Toronto.
McGuiganGS (2011)
Crisis of professionalism in public services: Addressing challenges to librarianship from a public administration perspective.Library Review60(7): 560–574.
38.
MayF (2011)
Methods for studying the use of public spaces in libraries.Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science35(4): 354–366.
39.
MayFBlackF (2010)
The life of the space: Evidence from Nova Scotia public libraries.Evidence Based Library and Information Practice5(2): 5–34.
40.
MitchellT (1991)
The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics.American Political Science Review85(1): 77–96.
NoordegraafM (2007)
From ‘pure’ to ‘hybrid’ professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains.Administration & Society39(6): 761–785.
43.
PainterJ (2006)
Prosaic geographies of stateness.Political Geography25(7): 752–774.
44.
PatemanJVincentJ (2010) Public Libraries and Social Justice.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
45.
PowellA (2012)
Navigating the new norm: Vendor, publisher, and librarian strategies to cope with the changing information industry.Journal of Library Administration52(5): 370–395.
46.
PyatiAKKamalAM (2012)
Rethinking community and public space from the margins: A study of community libraries in Bangalore’s slums.Area44(3): 336–343.
47.
RoseC (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership.
Boulder, CO;
Westview Press.
48.
RudzionieneJDvorakJ (2014)
Public administration approach: What do libraries need for consistent information services evaluation.Library Management35(6/7): 495–507.
49.
StaeheliLMitchellAD (2008) The People’s Property: Power, Politics and the Public.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
WaldronJ (1988) The Right to Private Property.
Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
53.
WeintraubJ (1997) The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In: WeintraubJKumanK (eds) Public and Private in Thought and Practice: perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
54.
WillinghamT (2008)
Libraries as civic agents.Public Library Quarterly27(2): 97–110.
55.
WilsonV (2008)
Public libraries in Canada: An overview.Library Management29(6/7): 556–570.
56.
WorthmanB (2012)
What are they doing and what do they want: The library spaces customer survey at Edmonton Public Library.The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research7(2): 1–22.
