The recent rise in the use of third-party standards and rating systems to evaluate the sustainability or greenness of urban programs and policies includes their explicit incorporation into municipal policy in the case of certified green buildings. In this paper the theoretical framework of performativity is used to explain how multiple forms of city activity interlock through policy to name, repeat, and recount the city as a leader—which, in this particular discursive formation, means being green. By performing greenness to their peers, city staff and elected officials work on the city's identity as an innovator and leader. Furthermore, the internal performance of greenness to residents and businesspeople indicates the appropriate role of local government in relation to private sector activity and protecting citizens, including taking on the risks of new technologies and practices to ease the way for private capital.
AbbotJ AKaspryzkK“Hot air: university climate action plans and disarticulated federalism”. The Professional Geographer201264: 572–585.
2.
AcutoM“Ain't about politics? The wicked power-geometry of Sydney's greening governance”. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research201236: 381–399.
3.
BetsillBBulkeleyH“Transnational networks and global environmental governance”. International Studies Quarterly200448: 471–493.
4.
BialasiewiczLCampbellDEldenSGrahamSJeffreyAWilliamsA“Performing security: the imaginative geographies of current US strategy”. Political Geography200726: 405–422.
5.
BlokA“Clash of the eco-sciences: carbon marketization, environmental NGOs and performativity as politics”. Economy and Society201140: 451–476.
6.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (2006 [1991]) On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Presstranslated by C Porter.
7.
BoyleTMcGuirkP“The decentered firm and the adoption of sustainable office space in Sydney, Australia”. Australian Geographer201243: 39–10.
8.
BulkeleyH“Urban sustainability: learning from best practice? “. Environment and Planning C200638: 1029–1044.
9.
BulkeleyHBetsillM“Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change”. Environmental Politics200514: 42–63.
10.
BulkeleyHSchroederH“Beyond state/non-state divides: global cities and the governing of climate change”. European Journal of International Relations201218: 743–766.
11.
BulkeleyHCastan BrotoVEdwardsG“Bringing climate change to the city: towards low carbon urbanism?”. Local Environment201217: 545–551.
12.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, New York: Routledge.
13.
ButlerJ (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 2nd. New York: Routledge.
14.
CallonM“An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social”. Theory, Culture and Society200724: 139–163.
15.
GregsonNRoseG“Taking Butler elsewhere: performativities, spatialities and subjectivities”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space200018: 433–452.
16.
HysingEOlssonJ“Who greens the northern light? Green inside activists in local environmental governing in Sweden”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy201129: 693–708.
17.
JonasAGibbsDWhileA“The new urban politics as a politics of carbon control”. Urban Studies201148: 2537–2554.
18.
KaiserRNikiforovaE“The performativity of scale: the social construction of scale effects in Narva, Estonia”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space200826: 537–562.
19.
KeskitaloEJuholaSWesterhoffL“Climate change as governmentality: technologies of government for adaptation in three European countries”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management201255: 435–452.
20.
KirwanJ“The interpersonal world of direct marketing: examining conventions of quality at UK farmers' markets”. Journal of Rural Studies200622: 301–312.
21.
KloosterD“Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: the political ecology of a nongovernmental market intervention”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers200696: 541–565.
22.
KouskyCSchneiderS“Global climate policy: will cities lead the way?”. Climate Policy20033: 59–72.
23.
KusnoA“The green governmentality in an Indonesian metropolis”. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography201132: 314–331.
24.
KuusM“Ubiquitous identities and elusive subjects: puzzles from Central Europe”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series200732: 90–101.
25.
LindsethG“The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of local climate policy”. Local Environment20049: 325–336.
26.
LiveseySHartmanCStaffordEShearerM“Performing sustainable development through eco-collaboration: the Ricelands Habitat Partnership”. Journal of Business Communication200946: 423–454.
27.
McCannE“Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research. agenda” Annals of the Association of American Geographers2011101: 107–130.
28.
Millard-BallA“Do city climate plans reduce emissions?”. Journal of Urban Economics2012, pp. 71289–311.
29.
MoserS“In the long shadows of inaction: the quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States”. Global Environmental Politics20077: 124–144.
30.
NashC“Performativity in practice: some recent work in cultural geography”. Progress in Human Geography200024: 653–664.
31.
OelsA“Rendering climate change governable by risk: from probability to contingency”. Geoforum201345: 17–29.
32.
Otto-ZimmermannK“From Rio to Rio + 20: the changing role of local governments in the context of current global governance”. Local Environment201217: 511–516.
33.
PatersonMStrippleJ“My Space: governing individuals' carbon emissions”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space201028: 341–362.
34.
PonteSGibbonP“Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains”. Economy and Society200534: 1–31.
35.
RacoMLinW-I“Urban sustainability, conflict management, and the geographies of postpoliticism: a case study of Taipei”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy201230: 191–208.
36.
RetzlaffR“The use of LEED in planning and development regulation: an exploratory analysis”. Journal of Planning Education and Research200929: 67–77.
37.
RiceJ“Climate, carbon, and territory”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers2010100: 929–937.
38.
RutherfordS“Green governmentality: insights and opportunities in the study of nature's rule”. Progress in Human Geography200731: 291–307.
39.
RutlandTAylettA“The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space200826: 627–646.
40.
SharpEDaleyDLynchM“Understanding local adoption and implementation of climate change mitigation policy”. Urban Affairs Review201147: 433–457.
41.
SmithRWiekA“Achievements and opportunities in initiating governance for urban sustainability”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy201230: 429–447.
42.
SummervilleJAdkinsBKendallG“Community participation, rights, and responsibilities: the governmentality of sustainable development policy in Australia”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy200826: 696–711.
43.
ThévenotLMoodyMLafayeCLamontMThévenotL“Forms of valuing nature: arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes”. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States2000Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–272.
44.
ThriftNClarkGTickellA“Performing finance: the industry, the media and the image”. Review of International Political Economy200411: 289–310.
45.
WhileABulkeleyHBrotoV CHodsonMMarvinS“The carbon calculus and transitions in urban politics and political theory”. Cities and Low Carbon Transitions2010New York: Routledge, pp. 42–53.
46.
WhileAJonasAGibbsD“From sustainable development to carbon control”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series201035: 76–93.
47.
WilkinsonJ“A new paradigm for economic analysis? Recent convergences in French social science and an exploration of the convention theory approach with a consideration of its application to the analysis of the agrofood system”. Economy and Society199726: 305–339.
