This paper is an outcome of a household survey conducted in Rajarhat, a place in West Bengal that witnessed the largest dispossession of farmers from their land in the last three decades for the establishment of business hubs, industrial technology (IT) parks, and dwelling units. The study substantiates that large-scale acquisition of agricultural land has transformed the rural livelihood structure of the workforce of dispossessed households in three ways. First, the share of non-farm workers has increased dramatically; second, the majority of these workers have established a foothold in various self-employment and nonfarm economic activities; and third, a small proportion remains unemployed in the post-acquisition stage. The temporary work opportunities created by the government for dispossessed households are not inclusive, and dispossessed households that are well-linked with the local governance have gained more in securing these opportunities.
BalagopalK. (2007). Land unrest in Andhra Pradesh-III: Illegal acquisition in tribal areas. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(40), 4029–4034.
2.
BanerjeeA.BardhanP.BasuK.ChaudhuryM. D.GhatakM.…GuhaA. S. (2007). Beyond Nandigram: Industrialization in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(17), 1487–1489.
3.
BanerjeeP. S.RoyD. (2007). Behind the present peasant unrest in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(22), 2048–2051.
4.
BardhanP.LucaM.MookherjeeD.PinoF. (2011). Evolution of land distribution in West Bengal 1967–2004: Role of land reform and demographic changes. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2012/11/dp217.pdf
5.
BasoleA.BasuD. (2011). Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India: Part I – Agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(14), 41–58.
6.
BhattachariyaM. (2007). Nandigram and the question of development. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(21), 1895–1899.
7.
CerneaM. M. (2000). Risks, safeguards and reconstruction: A model for population displacement and resettlement. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(41), 3659–3678.
8.
ChandraN. K. (2008). Tata Motors in Singur: A step towards industrialisation and pauperisation?Economic and Political Weekly, 43(50), 36, 41–51.
9.
Comptroller and Audit General of India. (2007). Audit report (commercial) on West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited. New Delhi: CAG, GOI.
10.
Council for Social Development. (2008). Indian social development report, 2008: Development and displacement. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
11.
De WetC. (2001). Economic development and population displacement: Can everybody win?Economic & Political Weekly, 36(50), 4637–4646.
12.
FernandesW. (1998). Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 1998: Rights of project-affected people ignored. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(42–43), 2703–2706.
13.
FernandesW. (2005). Rehabilitation as a right: Where is the policy?Social Action, 55(2), 123–137.
14.
FernandesW. (2007). Singur and the displacement scenario. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(3), 203–205.
15.
FernandesW. (2009). India’s half century search for a resettlement policy and the right to livelihood. In ModiR. (Ed.), Beyond relocation: The imperative of sustainable resettlement (pp. 102–126). New Delhi: Sage.
16.
GhatakM.MitraS.MukherjeeD.NathA. (2013). Land acquisition and compensation: What really happened in Singur?Economic and Political Weekly, 48(21), 32–44.
17.
MahapatraL. K. (1999). Resettlement, impoverishment and reconstruction in India: Development for the deprived. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
18.
MohantyM. (2007). Political economy of agrarian transformation: Another view of Singur. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(9), 737–741.
19.
NarainV. (2009). Growing city, shrinking hinterland: Land acquisition, transition and conflict in peri-urban Gurgaon, India. Environment and Urbanisation, 21(2), 501–512.
20.
PenzP.DrydykJ.BoseP. S. (2011). Displacement by development: Ethics, rights and responsibilities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
RoyA. (2014a). Household survey. Conducted in eight revenue villages in Rajarhat C.D. Block during September to December 2014. Unpublished interview data.
22.
RoyA. (2014b). In pursuit of development: Land acquisition and dilution of legal provisions. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 2(2), 149–170.
23.
SarkarA. (2007). Development and displacement: Land acquisition in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(16), 1435–1442.
24.
SauR. (2008). A ballad of Singur: Progress with human dignity. Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 10–13.
25.
SampatP. (2013). Limits to absolute power: Eminent domain and the right to land in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(19), 40–52.
26.
SharmaR. N. (2010). Changing facets of involuntary displacement and resettlement in India. Social Change, 40(1), 503–524.
27.
West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation. (2011/2014). Land acquired for Rajarhat Newtown Project. Kolkata: Author.
28.
World Bank. (2004). Involuntary resettlement sourcebook: Planning and implementation of development projects. Washington, DC: Author.
