Systemic sclerosis (SSc) negatively affects quality of life, yet the factors influencing life satisfaction, a key aspect of well-being, remain unclear in this population. Social isolation is common in SSc, potentially linked to decreased life satisfaction, but the underlying mechanisms are unexplored. Resilience, a modifiable psychological resource, may act as a mediator in this relationship among people with SSc. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived social isolation and life satisfaction and to investigate whether resilience mediates this relationship.
Methods:
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Social Isolation Short Form, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale were used to assess perceived social isolation, resilience, and life satisfaction. Linear regressions were conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS.
Results:
Among 163 individuals with SSc who provided complete data at baseline (mean age = 54.7 ± 11.9 years), 47% had diffuse cutaneous SSc, and 57% had an early disease duration. Perceived social isolation was negatively associated with life satisfaction. Resilience partially mediated the association between perceived social isolation and life satisfaction in people with SSc.
Conclusions:
Findings revealed a significant association between perceived social isolation and life satisfaction and the mediating role of resilience in this association among people with SSc. Results suggest resilience may act as a protective mediator, counteracting the negative influence of perceived social isolation on life satisfaction. Findings support the promotion of social connection and resilience to enhance life satisfaction in people with SSc.
ParkEHStrandVOhYJ, et al. Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis compared with other rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther2019; 21: 61.
2.
ElhaiMMeuneCAvouacJ, et al. Trends in mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis over 40 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Rheumatology2012; 51(6): 1017–1026.
YoungANamasRDodgeC, et al. Hand impairment in systemic sclerosis: various manifestations and currently available treatment. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol2016; 2(3): 252–269.
5.
JewettLRHudsonMMalcarneVL, et al. Sociodemographic and disease correlates of body image distress among patients with systemic sclerosis. PLoS ONE2012; 7(3): e33281.
6.
HeyneSHaufeEBeissertS, et al. Determinants of depressive symptoms, quality of life, subjective health status and physical limitation in patients with systemic sclerosis. Acta Derm Venereol2023; 103: 6502.
7.
LescoatAMurphySLChenYT, et al. Symptom experience of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis from the patients’ perspective: a qualitative study. Semin Arthritis Rheum2022; 52: 151926.
8.
SumptonDThakkarVO’NeillS, et al. ‘It’s not me, it’s not really me.’Insights from patients on living with systemic sclerosis: an interview study. Arthritis Care Res2017; 69: 1733–1742.
9.
KhannaDAllanoreYDentonCP, et al. Patient perception of disease burden in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord2020; 5(1): 66–76.
DienerEEmmonsRALarsenRJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess1985; 49: 71–75.
12.
DienerESuhEMLucasRE, et al. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull1999; 125: 276–302.
13.
DienerEPressmanSDHunterJ, et al. If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Appl Psychol Health Well Being2017; 9(2): 133–167.
14.
DienerEChanMY. Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being2011; 3: 1–43.
15.
HawkleyLCCacioppoJT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med2010; 40(2): 218–227.
16.
MurphySLWhibleyDKratzAL, et al. Fatigue predicts future reduced social participation, not reduced physical function or quality of life in people with systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord2021; 6: 187–193.
17.
HahnEADevellisRFBodeRK, et al. Measuring social health in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Qual Life Res2010; 19(7): 1035–1044.
18.
OhHJOzkayaELaRoseR. How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput Hum Behav2014; 30: 69–78.
19.
SouthwickSMBonannoGAMastenAS, et al. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. Eur J Psychotraumatol2014; 5: 25338.
20.
FolkeCCarpenterSRWalkerB, et al. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc2010; 15: 20, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268226 (accessed 20 September 2023).
21.
ShawYBradleyMZhangC, et al. Development of resilience among rheumatoid arthritis patients: a qualitative study. Arthritis Care Res2020; 72(9): 1257–1265.
22.
WrightLJZautraAJGoingS. Adaptation to early knee osteoarthritis: the role of risk, resilience, and disease severity on pain and physical functioning. Ann Behav Med2008; 36(1): 70–80.
23.
AlASAAlqudahA. Examine the role of psychological resilience in predicting social and professional performance in patients with diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatism. Health Psychol Res2023; 11: 73350.
24.
García-CarrascoMMendoza-PintoCLeón-VázquezJ, et al. Associations between resilience and sociodemographic factors and depressive symptoms in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Psychosom Res2019; 122: 39–42.
25.
HoseiniSSTalebiSSMotaghiZ, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life in women with lupus. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. Epub ahead of print 3 April 2022. DOI: 10.18502/ssu.v30i1.9099.
26.
BuikstraERossHKingCA, et al. The components of resilience—perceptions of an Australian rural community. J Community Psychol2010; 38: 975–991.
27.
ZautraAJArewasikpornADavisMC. Resilience: promoting well-being through recovery, sustainability, and growth. Res Hum Dev2010; 7: 221–238.
28.
YıldırımMTanrıverdiFÇ. Social support, resilience and subjective well-being in college students. J Posit Sch Psychol2021; 5: 127–135.
29.
LoefflerSPoehlmannKHornemannB. Finding meaning in suffering?—meaning making and psychological adjustment over the course of a breast cancer disease. Eur J Cancer Care2018; 27(3): e12841.
30.
NoorAMPriyalathaGIsaNJM. Personal growth initiative in relation to life satisfaction among university students. Educ J Soc Sci2020; 6: 42–49.
31.
PejičićMRistićMAnđelkovićV. The mediating effect of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in postwar youth. J Community Psychol2018; 46: 457–472.
32.
LeeJHongJZhouY, et al. The relationships between loneliness, social support, and resilience among Latinx immigrants in the United States. Clin Soc Work J2020; 48(1): 99–109.
33.
ZhaoXZhangDWuM, et al. Loneliness and depression symptoms among the elderly in nursing homes: a moderated mediation model of resilience and social support. Psychiatry Res2018; 268: 143–151.
34.
GerinoERollèLSechiC, et al. Loneliness, resilience, mental health, and quality of life in old age: a structural equation model. Front Psychol2017; 8: 2003, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02003 (accessed 17 October 2023).
35.
ZhangKBurrJAMutchlerJE, et al. Online engagement, resilience, and loneliness among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Soc Sci Med2023; 329: 116026.
36.
NewmarkRAllisonTSmithA, et al. I would be more at a loss without it: technology as a tool for resilience for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Innov Aging2021; 5: 217–218.
37.
MurphySLChenYTAloreM, et al. Effects of a resilience-building energy management program on fatigue and other symptoms in systemic sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res. Epub ahead of print 17 October 2023. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25253.
38.
ChenYTMurphySLFurstDE, et al. Factors associated with life satisfaction in systemic sclerosis: examining the moderating roles of social support and spiritual well-being. J Scleroderma Relat Disord2023; 8(2): 107–112.
HathawayCABloomerAMOswaldLB, et al. Factors associated with self-reported social isolation among patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Psychol2022; 41(4): 311–318.
41.
ConnorKMDavidsonJR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety2003; 18(2): 76–82.
42.
Campbell-SillsLSteinMB. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress2007; 20(6): 1019–1028.
43.
NeyerMAHenryRSCarrierM-E, et al. Validity, reliability, and differential item functioning of English and French versions of the 10-item Connor-Davidson resilience scale in systemic sclerosis: a Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res2023; 75(11): 2369–2378.
44.
CellaDChoiSWCondonDM, et al. PROMIS® adult health profiles: efficient short-form measures of seven health domains. Value Health2019; 22(5): 537–544.
45.
CellaDLaiJSJensenSE, et al. PROMIS fatigue item bank had clinical validity across diverse chronic conditions. J Clin Epidemiol2016; 73: 128–134.
46.
PilkonisPAChoiSWReiseSP, et al. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment2011; 18(3): 263–283.
47.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.
48.
Campbell-SillsLFordeDRSteinMB. Demographic and childhood environmental predictors of resilience in a community sample. J Psychiatr Res2009; 43(12): 1007–1012.
49.
KhannaDFurstDEClementsPJ, et al. Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord2017; 2(1): 11–18.
