This study explored the mediating effects of team processes and team engagement on the relationship between empowering leadership and team innovation using a time-lagged research design and two-source data, where the supervisors’ team innovation rating was measured after a 3-month lag. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses. The findings showed that (1) team processes fully mediated the positive relationship between empowering leadership and team innovation, (2) team engagement fully mediated the positive relationship between empowering leadership and team innovation, and (3) the positive covariance of both team processes and team engagement contributed to stimulating the positive effect of empowering leadership on team innovation. Theoretical implications, practical implications, and directions for future research were also discussed.
AdeelABatoolSAliR (2018) Empowering leadership and team creativity: Understanding the direct-indirect path. Business: Theory and Practice19(1): 242–254.
2.
AhearneMMathieuJRappA (2005) To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology90(5): 945–955.
3.
AmabileTM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(2): 357–376.
4.
AmabileTM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior10: 123–167.
5.
AmundsenSMartinsenØL (2014) Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly25(3): 487–511.
6.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
7.
ArnoldJAAradSRhoadesJA, et al. (2000) The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior21(3): 249–269.
8.
AxtellCMHolmanDJUnsworthKL, et al. (2000) Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology73(3): 265–285.
9.
BakkerABDemeroutiEEuwemaMC (2005) Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology10(2): 170–180.
10.
BakkerABEmmerikHVEuwemaMC (2006) Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work and Occupations33(4): 464–489.
11.
BakkerABSchaufeliWB (2008) Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior29(2): 147–154.
12.
BeckerTE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods8(3): 274–289.
13.
BiemannTKearneyEMarggrafK (2015) Empowering leadership and managers' career perceptions: Examining effects at both the individual and the team level. The Leadership Quarterly26(5): 775–789.
14.
BlieseP J (2000) Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Within-Group Agreement, Non-independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp.349–381.
15.
BrislinRW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisHCBerryJW (eds) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp.389–444.
16.
BurkeCSStaglKCSalasE, et al. (2006) Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology91(6): 1189–1207.
17.
BurpittWJBigonessWJ (1997) Leadership and innovation among teams: The impact of empowerment. Small Group Research28(3): 414–423.
18.
CarmeliASchaubroeckJTishlerA (2011) How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly22(2): 399–411.
19.
ChanD (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology83(2): 234–246.
20.
ChangHTHsuHMLiouJW, et al. (2013) Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: A moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology43(10): 2120–2135.
21.
CheongMSpainSMYammarinoFJ, et al. (2016) Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly27(4): 602–616.
22.
CheongMYammarinoFJDionneSD, et al. (2019) A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. The Leadership Quarterly30(1): 34–58.
23.
ChiNWHuangYMLinSC (2009) A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: The moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group & Organization Management34(6): 698–726.
24.
CohenSGBaileyDE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management23(3): 239–290.
25.
CostaPMargarida PassosABakkerA (2014b) Empirical validation of the team work engagement construct. Journal of Personnel Psychology13(1): 34–45.
26.
CostaPLPassosAMBakkerAB (2014a) Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology87(2): 414–436.
27.
CraigESilverstoneY (2010) Tapping the power of collective engagement. Strategic HR Review9(3): 5–10.
28.
De BonoSJonesS (2008) Communications in teams. In: De BonoSJonesSVan der HeijdenB (eds) Managing Cultural Diversity. Maidenhead: Meyer, pp.48–71.
29.
De DreuCKWestMA (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology86(6): 1191–1201.
30.
Drach-ZahavyASomechA (2001) Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice5(2): 111–123.
31.
EdwardsJR (2008) To prosper, organizational psychology should . . . overcome methodological barriers to progress. Journal of Organizational Behavior29(4): 469–491.
32.
EisenbeissSABoernerS (2010) Transformational leadership and R&D innovation: Taking a curvilinear approach. Creativity and Innovation Management19(4): 364–372.
33.
EisenbeissSAvan KnippenbergDBoernerS (2008) Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology93(6): 1438–1446.
34.
FayDBorrillCAmirZ, et al. (2006) Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology79(4): 553–567.
35.
FrischerJ (1993) Empowering management in new product development units. Journal of Product Innovation Management10(5): 393–402.
36.
GeorgeJM (1990) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology75(2): 107–116.
37.
GuchaitP (2016) The mediating effect of team engagement between team cognitions and team outcomes in service-management teams. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research40(2): 139–161.
38.
HaasAAbonneauDBorzilloS, et al. (2021) Afraid of engagement? Towards an understanding of engagement in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice19(2): 169–180.
39.
HaoPHeWLongLR (2018) Why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance: The pivotal roles of passion for work and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies25(1): 85–100.
40.
HillNSBartolKM (2016) Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology69(1): 159–198.
41.
HofstedeG (1994) Management scientists are human. Management Science40(1): 4–13.
42.
HofstedeGBondMH (1988) The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics16(4): 5–21.
43.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
44.
HülshegerURAndersonNSalgadoJF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology94(5): 1128–1145.
45.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology69(1): 85–98.
46.
JanssenOVan YperenNW (2004) Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal47(3): 368–384.
47.
JiangYChenCC (2018) Integrating knowledge activities for team innovation: Effects of transformational leadership. Journal of Management44(5): 1819–1847.
48.
JöreskogKGSörbomD(2004) Lisrel 8.71. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
49.
KahnWA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal33(4): 692–724.
50.
KozlowskiSWJBellBS (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. In: BormanWIllgenDKlimoskiR (eds) Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley, pp.333–375.
51.
KutnerMHNachtsheimC JNeterJ, et al. (2005) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5th edn.Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
52.
Le BlancPMGonzález-RomáVWangH (2021) Correction to: Charismatic leadership and work team innovative behavior: The role of team task interdependence and team potency. Journal of Business and Psychology36: 347–414.
53.
LeeAWillisSTianAW (2018) Empowering leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(3): 306–325.
54.
LeeGXiaW (2010) Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Quarterly34(1): 87–114.
55.
LePineJAPiccoloRFJacksonCL, et al. (2008) A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology61(2): 273–307.
56.
MarksMAMathieuJEZaccaroSJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review26(3): 356–376.
57.
MartinaityteIUnsworthKLSacramentoCA (2020) Is the project ‘mine’ or ‘ours’? A multilevel investigation of the effects of individual and collective psychological ownership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology93(2): 302–327.
58.
MartinSLLiaoHCampbellEM (2013) Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal56(5): 1372–1395.
59.
MarupingLMVenkateshVThatcherSMB, et al. (2015) Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal58(5): 1313–1333.
60.
MathieuJEGilsonLLRuddyTM (2006) Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology91(1): 97–108.
61.
MathieuJEMaynardMTTaylorSR, et al. (2007) An examination of the effects of organizational district and team contexts on team processes and performance: A meso-mediational model. Journal of Organizational Behavior28(7): 891–910.
62.
MathieuJESchulzeW (2006) The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal49(3): 605–619.
63.
McDonoughEF (2000) Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management17(3): 221–235.
64.
McDowellJHuangYKCazaA (2018) Does identity matter? An investigation of the effects of authentic leadership on student-athletes’ psychological capital and engagement. Journal of Sport Management32(3): 227–242.
65.
MohammedSAngellLC (2004) Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior25(8): 1015–1039.
66.
MorgesonFPDeRueDSKaramEP (2010) Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management36(1): 5–39.
67.
MumfordTVVan IddekingeCHMorgesonFP, et al. (2008) The team role test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology93(2): 250–267.
68.
PescosolidoAT (2002) Emergent leaders as managers of group emotion. The Leadership Quarterly13(5): 583–599.
69.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
70.
RaudenbushSBrykACongdonR (2009) HLM for Windows (Version 6.08). [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
71.
RichBLLepineJACrawfordER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal53(3): 617–635.
72.
SalanovaMAgutSPeiróJM (2005) Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology90(6): 1217–1227.
73.
SchaufeliWB (2012) Work engagement. What do we know and where do we go?Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology14(1): 3–10.
74.
SchaufeliWBBakkerAB (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior25: 293–315.
75.
SeibertSESilverSRRandolphWA (2004) Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal47(3): 332–349.
76.
ShalleyCEZhouJOldhamGR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management30(6): 933–958.
77.
SharmaPNKirkmanBL (2015) Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management40(2): 193–237.
78.
SomechA (2006) The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management32(1): 132–157.
79.
SrivastavaABartolKMLockeEA (2006) Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal49(6): 1239–1251.
80.
StokerJILooiseJCFisscherOAM, et al. (2001) Leadership and innovation: Relations between leadership, individual characteristics and the functioning of R&D teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management12(7): 1141–1151.
81.
TangGChenYKnippenbergD, et al. (2020) Antecedents and consequences of empowering leadership: Leader power distance, leader perception of team capability, and team innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior41(6): 551–566.
82.
ThayerALPetruzzelliAMcClurgCE (2018) Addressing the paradox of the team innovation process: A review and practical considerations. American Psychologist73(4): 363–375.
83.
TjosvoldDTangMMLWestM (2004) Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group & Organization Management29(5): 540–559.
84.
TorrentePSalanovaMLlorensS, et al. (2012) Teams make it work: How team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema24(1): 106–112.
85.
TuckeyMRBakkerABDollardMF (2012) Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology17(1): 15–27.
86.
van KnippenbergD (2017) Team innovation. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4: 211–233.
87.
VecchioRPJustinJEPearceCL (2010) Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly21(3): 530–542.
88.
WestMA (2002) Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and Innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review51(3): 355–387.
89.
WestMAAndersonNR (1996) Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology81(6): 680–693.
90.
WestMABorrillCSDawsonJF, et al. (2003) Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care. The Leadership Quarterly14(4–5): 393–410.
91.
ZhuYQChenHG (2016) Empowering leadership in R&D teams: A closer look at its components, process, and outcomes. R&D Management46(4): 726–735.
