What Makes Creative Teams Tick? Cohesion,Engagement,and Performance Across Creativity Tasks: A Three-Wave Study

Abstract

The present study examines the mediational role of collective engagement in the relationship between team cohesion and team creative performance. A reciprocal process was expected to unfold across creativity task episodes: (a) team cohesion leads to collective task engagement, which in turn has a positive effect on team creative performance (perceived team performance and independently rated creativity), and (b) perceived team creative performance predicts the development of future team cohesion. The study relied on a longitudinal three-wave research design through an organizational simulation exercise, in which 118 project teams (605 individuals) were charged with three creativity tasks. This study advances collective task engagement as an important mediational process explaining team performance in creative activities.

Keywords

team cohesion collective task engagement team creative performance reciprocal processes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike

(1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.

Amabile

T. M.

(1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Staw

B. M.

Cummings

L. L.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 187-209). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Amabile

T. M.

(1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Amabile

T. M.

Conti

Coon

Laznby

Herron

(1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.

Anderson

Potocnik

Zhou

(2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review and prospective commentary. Journal of Management, 40, 1297-1333.

Baer

Leenders

R. T. A. J.

Oldham

G. R.

Vadera

A. K.

(2010). Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 827-845.

Baer

Oldham

G. R.

(2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970.

Bakker

A. B.

Demerouti

(2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

10.

Bandura

(2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78.

11.

Beal

D. J.

Cohen

R. R.

Burke

M. J.

McLendon

C. L.

(2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.

12.

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

13.

Bliese

P. D.

(1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 355-373.

14.

Bliese

P. D.

(2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

15.

Catmull

(2008, September). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard Business Review, 86, 64-72.

16.

Chan

(1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.

17.

Choi

J. N.

Sung

S. Y.

Lee

Cho

D.-S.

(2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward the innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 107-124.

18.

Christian

M. S.

Garza

A. S.

Slaughter

J. E.

(2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136.

19.

Chun

J. S.

Shin

Choi

J. N.

Kim

M. S.

(2013). How does corporate ethics contribute to firm financial performance? The role of collective organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 39, 853-877.

20.

Costa

P. L.

Passos

A. M.

Bakker

A. B.

(2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 87, 414-436.

21.

Crawford

E. R.

LePine

J. A.

Rich

B. L.

(2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834-848.

22.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.

23.

Demerouti

Bakker

A. B.

Nachreiner

Schaufeli

W. B.

(2001). The Job Demands-Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512.

24.

Eisenbeiss

S. A.

Van Knippenberg

Boerner

(2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1438-1446.

25.

Ensley

M. D.

Pearson

A. W.

Amason

A. C.

(2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 365-386.

26.

Evans

C. R.

Dion

K. L.

(1991). Group cohesion and performance a meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.

27.

Gagné

Deci

(2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.

28.

George

J. M.

(1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.

29.

Gersick

C. J. G.

(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.

30.

Goodman

S. A.

Svyantek

D. J.

(1999). Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254-275.

31.

Grant

Berry

(2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96.

32.

Greer

L. L.

(2012). Group cohesion: Then and now. Small Group Research, 43, 655-661.

33.

Gully

S. M.

Incalcaterra

K. A.

Joshi

Beaubien

J. M.

(2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.

34.

Hackman

J. R.

(2012). From causes to conditions in group research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 428-444.

35.

Harter

J. K.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hayes

T. L.

(2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.

36.

Hatfield

Cacioppo

Rapson

R. L.

(1994). Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Hirschfeld

R. R.

Bernerth

J. B.

(2008). Mental efficacy and physical efficacy at the team level: Inputs and outcomes among newly formed action teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1429-1437.

38.

Hobfoll

S. E.

(2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337-421.

39.

Randel

A. E.

(2014). Knowledge sharing in teams: Social capital, extrinsic incentives, and team innovation. Group & Organization Management, 39, 213-243.

40.

Hülsheger

U. R.

Anderson

Salgado

J. F.

(2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.

41.

Ilgen

D. R.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Johnson

Jundt

(2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.

42.

James

L. R.

Demaree

R. G.

Wolf

(1993). rwg: An Assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.

43.

Jia

Shaw

J. D.

Tsui

A. S.

Park

T.-Y.

(2014). A social-structural perspective on employee–organization relationships and team creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 869-891.

44.

Joo

B. K. B.

Song

J. H.

Lim

D. H.

Yoon

S. W.

(2012). Team creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, developmental feedback and team cohesion. International Journal of Training and Development, 16, 77-91.

45.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Ilgen

D. R.

(2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.

46.

LeBreton

J. M.

Senter

J. L.

(2007). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815-852.

47.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.

48.

Marsh

H. W.

Balla

J. R.

Hau

K. T.

(1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In Marcoulides

G. A.

Schumacker

R. E.

(Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

49.

Mathieu

J. E.

Button

S. B.

(1992). An examination of the relative impact of normative information and self-efficacy on personal goals and performance over time. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1758-1775.

50.

Mathieu

J. E.

Kukenberger

M. R.

D’Innocenzo

Reilly

(2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 713-734.

51.

Mueller

Melwani

Goncalo

(2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13-17.

52.

Mullen

Copper

(1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.

53.

Nakata

(2010). Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: A group effectiveness perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 554-571.

54.

Nijstad

B. A.

De Dreu

C. K. W.

(2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 87-111.

55.

Chung

M.-H.

Labianca

(2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860-875.

56.

Ostroff

Kinicki

A. J.

Clark

M. A.

(2002). Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 355-368.

57.

Paskevich

Estabrooks

Brawley

Carron

(2001). Group cohesion in sport and exercise. In Singer

Hausenblas

Janelle

(Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 472-494). New York, NY: John Wiley.

58.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. M.

Lee

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.

59.

Price

J. L.

Mueller

C. W.

(1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

60.

Price

R. H.

Choi

Vinokur

A. D.

(2002). Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: How financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 302-312.

61.

Salanova

Agut

Peiró

J. M.

(2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.

62.

Salanova

Llorens

Cifre

Martínez

I. M.

Schaufeli

W. B.

(2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Research, 34, 43-73.

63.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Bakker

A. B.

(2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.

64.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Bakker

A. B.

Salanova

(2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716.

65.

Seers

Petty

M. M.

Cashman

J. F.

(1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management- a naturally-occurring quasi experiment. Group & Organization Management, 20, 18-38.

66.

Shalley

C. E.

(1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179-185.

67.

Shin

S. J.

Zhou

(2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709-1721.

68.

Somech

Drach-Zahavy

(2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684-708.

69.

Sung

S. Y.

Choi

J. N.

(2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 4-13.

70.

Taggar

(2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315-330.

71.

Tekleab

A. G.

Quigley

N. R.

Tesluk

P. E.

(2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34, 170-205.

72.

West

M. A.

Farr

J. L.

(1990). Innovation at work. In West

M. A.

Farr

J. L.

(Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 3-13). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

73.

Xanthopoulou

Bakker

A. B.

Demerouti

Schaufeli

(2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183-200.

74.

Zaccaro

S. J.

Rittman

A. L.

Marks

M. A.

(2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451-483.

75.

Zhou

(1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261-276.

76.

Ziessler

Nattkemper

(2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595-613.