Drawing on the concept of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals), the study tests assumptions
regarding interdependencies between individuals and organizations in determining work and
employment conditions. I-deals are personalized arrangements individual employees
negotiate with their employer. We suggest that workers use i-deals to make their jobs more
intrinsically and extrinsically rewarding. Ex post negotiation is assumed to have positive
effects on autonomy and distributive justice, which should mediate a positive relationship
between i-deals and job satisfaction. Cross-sectional (N = 373) and longitudinal (N = 74)
survey data support the hypothesized relationships. The potential of i-deals as a means
for individualizing organizations and further research needs are discussed.
AdamsJ.
S. (1963): Toward an
understanding of inequity. In: Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 67,
422–436.
2.
AnandS.VidyarthiP.LidenR. C.RousseauD. M.
(in press): Good citizens in poor quality relationships: Idiosyncratic
deals as a substitute for relationship quality. In: Academy of
Management Journal.
3.
AshfordS. J.BlackJ. S.
(1996): Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of
desire for control. In: Journal of Applied Psychology,
81199–214.
4.
ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M.
(1996): The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a
new organizational era.New York: Oxford University
Press.
5.
BabcockL.LascheverS.
(2003): Women don't ask.Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
6.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A.
(1986): The moderator-mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical
considerations. In: Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 51,
1173–1182.
7.
BergJ. M.WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. E.
(in press): Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at
different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. In:
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31,
158–186.
8.
BondF.BunceD.
(2003): The role of acceptance and job control in mental
health, job satisfaction, and work performance. In: Journal of
Applied Psychology, 88,
1057–1067.
9.
BurkeR.CooperC. L.
(2000): (Eds.): The organisation in crisis. Downsizing,
restructuring, and privatization.Oxford:
Blackwell.
10.
ByrneB.
M. (2001): Structural equation
modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
11.
BravermanH.
(1974): Labor and monopoly capital: The degredation of work in the
twentieth century.New York, NY: Monthly Review
Press.
12.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E.
(2001): The role of justice in organizations: A
meta-analysis. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 86,
278–321.
13.
ColeR. E.
(1979): Work, mobility, and participation: A comparative study of
American and Japanese industry.Berkley, CA: University of California
Press.
14.
CrannyC. J.SmithP. C.StoneE. F.
(1992): Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how
it affects their performance.New York: Lexington
Press.
15.
CrantJ.
M. (2000): Proactive
behavior in organizations. In: Journal of Management,
26, 435–462.
16.
De LangeA. H.TarisT. W.KompierM. A. J.HoutmanI. L. D.BongersP. M.
(2003): The very best of the Millennium: Longitudinal
research and the Demand-Control-(Support) model. In: Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, 8,
282–305.
17.
EsterP.De MoorR.HalmanL,
(eds.) (1993): The individualizing society. Value change in Europe
and North America.Tilburg: Tilburg University
Press.
18.
FolgerR.KonovskyM. A.
(1989): Effects of procedural and distributive justice on
reactions to pay decisions. In: Academy of Management
Journal, 32,
115–130.
19.
FinemanS.2006. On being positive: Concerns and
counterpoints. In: Academy of Management Review,
31, 270–291.
20.
FreseM.GarstH.FayD.
(2007): Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships
between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal
structural equation model. In: Journal of Applied
Psychology, 92,
1084–102.
21.
FriedY.FerrisG. R.
(1987): The validity of the job characteristics model: A
review and meta-analysis. In: Personnel Psychology,
40, 287–322.
22.
GoodmanP. S.FriedmanA.
(1971): An examination of Adam's theory of
inequity. In: Administrative Science Quarterly,
16, 271–288.
23.
GrantA. M.AshfordS. J.
(2008): The dynamics of proactivity at work.
In: Research in Organizational Behavior, 28,
3–34.
24.
GrantA. M.ParkerS.
(2009): Redesigning work design theories: The rise of
relational and proactive perspectives. In: Academy of Management
Annals, 3,
317–375.
25.
GreenbergJ.RobergeM. E.HoV. T.RousseauD.
(2004): Fairness in idiosyncratic work arrangements: Justice
as an i-deal. In: Research in Personnel and Human Resources
Management, 22,
1–34.
26.
GriffinM. A.NealA.ParkerS. K.
(2007): A new model of work role performance: Positive
behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. In: Academy
of Management Journal, 50,
327–347.
27.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R.
(1975): Development of the job diagnostic
survey. In: Journal of Applied Psychology,
60, 159–170.
28.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R.
(1980): Work redesign.Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
29.
HarterJ.SchmidtF.HayesT.
(2002): Business-unit-level relationship between employee
satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A
meta-analysis. In: Journal of Applied Psychology,
87, 268–279.
30.
HiltropJ.M.
(1999): The quest for the best: Human resource practices to
attract and retain talent. In: European Management
Journal, 17,
422–430.
31.
HiltropJ.
M. (1995): The changing
psychological contract: The human resource challenge of the 1990’. In:
European Management Journal, 13,
286–294.
32.
HirschP.
(1987): Pack your own parachute,
Reading:
Addison-Wesley.
33.
HollanderE.
P. (1958): Conformity,
status, and idiosyncrasy credit. In: Psychological
Review65, 117–127.
34.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ.
(2009): Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals:
Antecedents and outcomes of i-deals from a managerial perspective. In:
Journal of Managerial Psychology24, 738–764.
35.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ.
(2008): Creating flexible work arrangements through
idiosyncratic deals. In: Journal of Applied Psychology,
93, 655–664.
36.
HornungS.RousseauD. M.GlaserJ.AngererP.WeiglM.
(2010): Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign:
Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. In: Journal
of Organizational Behavior, 31,
187–215.
37.
HuangG. H.NiuX. Y.LeeC.
(2009): Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships: A
study of the antecedents and consequences of ex-post and developmental i-deals in a
Chinese context. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
Academy of Management, Chicago,
IL.
38.
IliesR.FulmerI. S.SpitzmullerM.JohnsonM. D.
(2009): Personality and citizenship behavior: The mediating
role of job satisfaction. In: Journal of Applied
Psychology, 94,
945–959.
39.
JudgeT.ThoresenC.BonoJ.PattonG.
(2001): The job satisfaction – job performance relationship:
A qualitative and quantitative review. In: Psychological
Bulletin, 127,
376–407.
40.
KlineR.
B. (1998): Principles and
practice of structural equation modeling.New York: Guilford
Press.
41.
KochanT.
A. (2005): Restoring the
American dream: A working families' agenda for America.Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
42.
KoysD.
(2001): The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational
citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level
longitudinal study. In: Personnel Psychology,
54, 101–114.
43.
LaiL.RousseauD. M.ChangK. T. T.
(2008): Coworkers as interested third parties to
idiosyncratic deals. In: Journal of Applied Psychology,
94, 547–556.
44.
LawlerE.
E.IIIFinegoldD.
(2001) Individualizing the organization: Past, present, and
future. In: Organizational Dynamics,
29: 1–15.
45.
LeeM. D.MacDermidS. M.BuckM. L.
(2000): Organizational paradigms of reduced-load work:
Accommodation, elaboration, and transformation. In: Academy of
Management Journal, 43,
1211–1226.
46.
LyonsP.
(2008): The crafting of jobs and individual
differences. In: Journal of Business Psychology,
2, 25–36.
47.
McFarlinD. B.SweeneyP. D.
(1992): Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of
satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. In:
Academy of Management Journal, 35,
626–637.
48.
MinerA.
S. (1987): Idiosyncratic
jobs in formalized organizations. In: Administrative Science
Quarterly, 32,
327–351.
49.
MoormanR.
H. (1991): Relationship
between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness
perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76,
845–855.
50.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV.
(2002): A comparison of methods to test mediation and other
intervening variable effects. In: Psychological
Methods, 7,
83–104.
51.
ParkerS. K.CollinsC. G.
(in press): Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple forms of
proactive behaviour. In: Journal of
Management.
52.
PinkD.
(2002): Free-agent nation: The future of working for
yourself.New York:
Warner.
53.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P.
(2003): Common method bias in behavioral research: A
critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. In:
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88,
879–903.
54.
PongratzH. J.VoßG. G.
(2003): From employee to ‘entreployee’: Towards a
‘self-entrepreneurial’ work force? In: Concepts and
Transformation, 8,
239–254.
55.
RosenC. C.SlaterD. J.KingT.KingA.
(2008): Measuring idiosyncratic work arrangements:
Development and validation of the ex-post i-deals scale. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management,
Anaheim, CA.
56.
RousseauD. M.HoV. T.GreenbergJ.
(2006): I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment
relationships. In: Academy of Management Review,
31, 977–994.
57.
RousseauD. M.HornungS.KimT. G.
(2009): Idiosyncratic deals: Testing propositions on timing,
content, and the employment relationship. In: Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 74,
338–348.
58.
RousseauD. M.KimT. G.
(2006): When workers bargain for themselves: Idiosyncratic
deals and the nature of the employment relationship. Paper
presented at British Academy of Management,
Belfast.
59.
RousseauD.
M. (2006): The shift in
risk from employers to workers in the new employment relationship. In:
LawlerE.
E.IIIO'TooleJ.
(Eds.): America at work: Choices and challenges.New York: Palgrave
Macmillan, 153–172.
60.
RousseauD.
M. (2005): I-deals:
Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves.New York:
Sharpe.
61.
RousseauD.
M. (2001): Schema,
promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological
contract. In: Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 74,
511–541.
62.
RousseauD.
M. (1995): Psychological
contracts in organizations. Understanding written and unwritten agreements.Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
63.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.
(2000): Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. In:
American Psychologist, 55,
68–78.
64.
SeibertS. E.KraimerM. L.CrantJ. M.
(2001): What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model
linking proactive personality and career success. In: Personnel
Psychology, 54,
845–875.
65.
SobelM.
E. (1982): Asymptotic
intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In:
LeinhartS.
(Ed.): Sociological methodology.San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass,
290–312.
66.
SauterS.HurrelJ.CooperC.
(Eds.): (1989): Job control and worker health.Chichester:
Wiley.
67.
SparrowP.
(2000): The new employment contract: Psychological
implications of future work. In: BurkeR.CooperC. L.
(Eds.), The organisation in crisis. Downsizing, restructuring, and
privatization. Oxford:
Blackwell,
165–187.
68.
SpectorP.
E. (1986): Perceived
control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation
at work. In: Human Relations, 39,
1005–1016.
69.
StuhlmacherA.WaltersA.
(1999): Gender differences in negotiation outcomes: A
metaanalysis. In: Personnel Psychology,
52, 653–77.
70.
SchmidtF.
L. (1996): Statistical
significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training
of researchers. In: Psychological Methods,
1, 115–129.
71.
TarisT.
W. (2000): A primer in
longitudinal data analysis.London:
Sage.
72.
Van der DoefM.MaesS.
(1999): The job demand-control (-support) model and
psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research.
In: Work & Stress, 13,
87–14.
73.
WarrP. B.
(2007): Work, happiness, and unhappiness.New York, NY:
Erlbaum.
74.
WeberM.
(1968): Economy and society: An outline of interpretive
sociology.New York, NY: Bedminster
Press.
75.
WeiL. J.CowanC. D.
(1988): Selection bias. In: JohnsonN.
L.KotzS. (Eds.):
Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 8.
New York: Wiley,
332–334.
76.
WeickK.
E. (2001):
Organizational redesign as improvisation. In:
WeickK.
E., Making sense of the
organization. Malden, MA:
Blackwell Press,
57–91.
77.
WilliamsK. Y.O'ReillyC.
A.III, (1998):
Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of
research. In: Research in Organizational Behavior,
20, 77–140.
78.
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. E.
(2001): Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active
crafters of their work. In: Academy of Management
Review, 26,
179–201.
