This article explores the relationship between different forms of autonomy, categorized into “job control” and “schedule control,” and measures of subjective well-being, using UK panel data from Understanding Society. Levels of autonomy differ considerably among UK employees. Managers report the greatest autonomy. Professionals, especially women, and less skilled occupations report substantially less. Panel probit, analysis of covariance, and change-score analysis evidence not only the positive impact of autonomy but also the differentiated and gendered relationship between autonomy and subjective well-being measures. Job control, including over tasks and pace of work, increases job and leisure satisfaction. Autonomy over work manner increases leisure and life satisfaction, but only among women. Informal schedule control has positive impacts on job (men and women) and life (men only) satisfaction.
Annual Population Survey. (2015). Annual Population Survey 2014: Employment by occupation and gender. Retrieved from http://www.nomisweb.co.uk.
2.
BainP.TaylorP. (2000) Entrapped by the “electronic panopticon”? Worker resistance in the call centre. Technology, Work and Employment New15(1): 2–18.
3.
BartlingB.FehrE.SchmidtK. (2012) Screening, competition, and job design: Economic origins of good jobs. The American Economic Review102(2): 834–864.
4.
BattR.ValcourP. M. (2003) Human resources practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations42(2): 189–220.
5.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2008) Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?Social Science & Medicine66: 1733–1749.
6.
BoxallP.MackyK. (2014) High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, Employment & Society28(6): 963–984.
7.
BrannenJ. (2005) Time and the negotiation of work–family boundaries: Autonomy or illusion?Time & Society14(1): 113–131.
8.
BrownA.CharlwoodA.FordeC.SpencerD. (2007) Job quality and the economics of new labour: A critical appraisal using subjective survey data. Cambridge Journal of Economics31(6): 941–971.
9.
BrownA.CharlwoodA.SpencerD. (2012) Not all that it might seem: Why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor summary measure of job quality. Work Employment & Society26(6): 1007–1018.
10.
ChoiS.LeiterJ.Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (2008) Contingent autonomy technology, bureaucracy, and relative power in the labor process. Work and Occupations35(4): 422–455.
11.
ClearF.DicksonK. (2005) Teleworking practice in small and medium-sized firms: Management style and worker autonomy. New Technology, Work and Employment20(3): 218–233.
12.
CostaG.SartoriS.ÅkerstedtT. (2006) Influence of flexibility and variability of working hours on health and well-being. Chronobiology International23(6): 1125–1137.
13.
Den DulkL.de RuijterJ. (2008) Managing work-life policies: Disruption versus dependency arguments. Explaining managerial attitudes towards employee utilization of work-life policies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management19(7): 1222–1236.
14.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999) Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Review125: 276–302.
15.
DikkersJ.van EngenM.VinkenburgC. (2010) Flexible work: Ambitious parents’ recipe for career success in The Netherlands. Career Development International15(6): 562–582.
16.
DolanP.PeasgoodT.WhiteM. (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Psychology29(1): 94–122.
17.
DoyleJ.ReevesR. (2001) Time out: The case for time sovereignty, London, England: The Industrial Society.
18.
DucharmeL.MartinJ. (2000) Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction: A test of the buffering hypothesis. Work and Occupations27(2): 223–243.
Fagan, C., Lyonette, C., Smith, M., & Saldaña-Tejeda, A. (2012). The influence of working time arrangements on work-life integration or ‘balance’: A review of the international evidence (Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 32). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
21.
FeldsteadA.JewsonN.PhizackleaA.WalterS. (2002) Opportunities to work at home in the context of work–life balance. Human Resource Management Journal12(1): 54–76.
22.
FelsteadA.JewsonN.WaltersS. (2005) Changing places of work, London, England: Palgrave.
23.
FieldingS. L. (1990) Physician reactions to malpractice suits and cost containment in Massachusetts. Work and Occupations17(3): 302–319.
24.
FigartD. (2001) Wage-setting under Fordism: The rise of job evaluation and the ideology of equal pay. Review of Political Economy13(4): 405–425.
25.
FindlayP.FindlayJ.StewartR. (2009) The consequences of caring: Skills, regulation and reward among early years workers. Work, Employment and Society23(3): 422–441.
26.
FindlayP.WarhurstC.KeepE.LloydC. (2017) Opportunity knocks? The possibilities and levers for improving job quality. Work and Occupations44(1): 3–22.
27.
GalinskyE.SakaiK.WigtonT. (2011) Workplace flexibility: From research to action. Work and Family21(2): 141–161.
28.
GallettaM.PortogheseI.BattistelliA. (2011) Intrinsic motivation, job autonomy and turnover intention in the Italian healthcare: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Management Research3(2): 1–19.
29.
GallieD. (2007) Employment regimes and the quality of work, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
GarciaI.MolinaA.NavarroM. (2007) How satisfied are spouses with their leisure time? Evidence from Europe. Journal of Family and Economic Issues28: 546–565.
31.
GlassJ. (2004) Blessing or curse: Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations31(3): 367–394.
32.
GlavinP. (2013) The impact of job insecurity and job degradation on the sense of personal control. Work and Occupations40(2): 115–142.
33.
GlavinP.SchiemanS. (2012) Work–family role blurring and work–family conflict: The moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work and Occupations39(1): 71–98.
34.
GoldenL. (2009) Flexible daily work schedules in U.S. jobs: Formal introductions needed?Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society48(1): 27–54.
35.
GreenF. (2004) Work intensification, discretion, and the decline in well-being at work. Eastern Economic Journal30(4): 615–625.
36.
GreenF. (2006) Demanding work. The paradox of job quality in the affluent society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
GregoryA.MilnerS. (2009) Trade unions and work-life balance: Changing times in France and the UK?British Journal of Industrial Relations47(1): 122–146.
38.
GrönlundA. (2007) More control, less conflict? Job demand-control, gender and work–family conflict. Gender, Work and Organization14(5): 476–497.
39.
HallL.AtkinsonC. (2006) Improving working lives: Flexible working and the role of employee control. Employee Relations28(4): 374–386.
40.
HardillI. (2002) Gender, migration and the dual career household. International studies of women and place series, London, England: Routledge.
41.
HolmanD. (2013) Job types and job quality in Europe. Human Relations66(4): 475–502.
42.
HoulihanM. (2002) Tensions and variations in call centre management strategies. Human Resource Management Journal12(4): 67–85.
43.
HumphreyS. E.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 1332–1356.
44.
JangJ. S.ParkR.ZippayA. (2011) The interaction effects of scheduling control and work–life balance programs on job satisfaction and mental health. International Journal of Social Welfare20: 135–143.
45.
JenkinsS.DelbridgeR.RobertsA. (2010) Emotional management in a mass customised call centre: Examining skill and knowledgeability in interactive service work. Work, Employment & Society24(3): 546–564.
46.
JorgensenB.JamiesonR.MartinF. (2010) Income, sense of community and subjective well-being: Combining economic and psychological variables. Journal of Economic Psychology31(4): 612–623.
47.
KallebergA. (2012) Job quality and precarious work: Clarifications, controversies, and challenges. Work and Occupations39(4): 427–448.
48.
KallebergA. L.NesheimT.OlsenK. M. (2009) Is participation good or bad for workers?Acta Sociologica52(2): 99–116.
49.
KarasekR. (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24(2): 285–306.
50.
KarasekR. A.TheorellT. (1990) Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life, New York, NY: Basic Books.
51.
KellyE. L.MoenP.TranbyE. (2011) Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review76(2): 265–290.
52.
KellyG. M. (2000) Employment and concepts of work in the new global economy. International Labour Review139(1): 5–32.
53.
KnudsenH.BusckO.LindJ. (2011) Work environment quality: The role of workplace participation and democracy. Work, Employment & Society25(3): 379–396.
54.
LeeY. H.LinH. (2011) ‘Gaming is my work’: Identity work in internet-hobbyist game workers. Work, Employment & Society25(3): 451–467.
55.
LewisJ.CampbellM. (2008) What’s in a name? ‘Work and family’ or ‘work and life’ balance policies in the UK since 1997 and the implications for the pursuit of gender equality. Social Policy and Administration42(5): 524–541.
56.
LimC.PutnamR. (2010) Religion, social networks and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review75(6): 914–933.
57.
LucasR. (2007) Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology92(4): 717–730.
58.
LynessK.GornickJ.StoneP.GrottoA. (2012) It’s all about control: Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review20(10): 1–27.
59.
MarglinS. (1974) What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics6(2): 60–112.
60.
McCarthyA.DarcyC.GradyG. (2010) Work-life balance policy and practice: Understanding line manager attitudes and behaviors. Human Resource Management Review20(2): 158–167.
61.
MessengerJ. C. (2011) Working time trends and developments in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics35(2): 295–316.
62.
OgbonnaE.HarrisL. C. (2004) Work intensification and emotional labour among UK university lecturers: An exploratory study. Organization Studies25(7): 1185–1203.
63.
OsnowitzD.HensonK. (2016) Leveraging limits for contract professionals: Boundary work and control of working time. Work and Occupations43(3): 326–360.
64.
PadavicI.ReskinB. (2002) Women and men at work, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
65.
RaessD.BurgoonB. (2015) Flexible work and immigration in Europe. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(1): 94–111.
66.
SallazJ. (2002) The House Rules: Autonomy and interests among service workers in the contemporary casino industry. Work and Occupations29(4): 394–427.
67.
SallazJ. (2015) Permanent pedagogy: How post-Fordist firms generate effort but not consent. Work and Occupations42(1): 3–34.
TeasdaleN. (2013) Fragmented sisters? The implications of flexible working policies for professional women’s workplace relationships. Gender, Work and Organization20(4): 397–412.
73.
ThompsonC.ProttasD. (2006) Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology10(4): 100–118.
74.
University of Essex. Institute for Social and Economic Research and NatCen Social Research. (2014). Understanding Society: Waves 1–5, 2009–2014 [computer file]. 7th Edition. Colchester, England: UK Data Archive [distributor], November 2015. SN: 6614, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6614-7.
75.
van MierloH.RutteC. G.VermuntJ. K. (2006) Individual autonomy in work teams: The role of team autonomy, self-efficacy, and social support. European Journal of Work and Occupational Psychology15(3): 281–299.
76.
van PraagB. M.FrijtersP.Ferrer-i-CarbonellA. (2003) The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization51(1): 29–49.
77.
VidalM. (2013) Low-autonomy work and bad jobs in postfordist capitalism. Human Relations66(4): 587–612.
78.
WheatleyD. (2012a) Work-life balance, travel-to-work, and the dual career household. Personnel Review41(6): 813–831.
79.
WheatleyD. (2012b) Good to be home? Time-use and satisfaction levels among home-based teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment27(3): 224–241.
80.
WheatleyD.HardillI.PhilpB. (2011) “Managing” reductions in working hours: A study of work time and leisure preferences in UK industry. Review of Political Economy23(3): 409–420.
81.
WheatleyD.WuZ. (2014) Dual careers, time-use, and satisfaction levels: Evidence from the British household panel survey. Industrial Relations Journal45(5): 443–464.
82.
WhiteM.HillS.McGovernP.MillsC.SmeatonD. (2003) High performance management practices, working hours and work-life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations41(2): 175–195.
83.
WightV.RaleyS. (2009) When home becomes work: Work and family time among workers at home. Social Indicators Research93(1): 197–202.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
