This article reviews the implications of special economic zones (SEZs) in the Indian context at both conceptual and empirical levels. It tries to draw attention toward detrimental modification in laws and actual implementation in the backdrop of judicial and executive practice. Implications in terms of socio-economic–legal–environmental taken together raise a question on the overall idea of SEZs. As evidences suggest, there are detrimental effects of SEZ operations in various forms.
AggarwalA. (2008). SEZs and industrial diversification: Analysis of Indian experience Paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Development: Challenge before Asian Studies, Punjabi University, Patiala.
2.
AlbassamB. A. (2014). Foreign direct investments, economic growth, and employment: A global perspective. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 39(3), 269–289.
3.
BoyengeJ.-P. S. (2007). ILO database on export processing zones[Working Paper No. 251]. International Labour Organization.
4.
Comptroller and Auditor General of India. (2015). CAG performance audit report on special economic zones. http://www.saiindia.gov.in/english/home/Our_Products/Audit_Report/Government_Wise/union_audit/recent_reports/union_performance/2014/INDT/Report_21/Chap_3.pdf
5.
Department of Commerce. (2015). Annual Report, 2014–15, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, New Delhi.
6.
Department of Commerce. (2017). Annual Report, 2016–17, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, New Delhi.
7.
Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics. (2015). Contribution of SEZ exports to overall country’s exports & employment generated in SEZs. DGCI&S, Department of Commerce, Government of India. http://www.ibef.org/IndiaNowMagazine_eVersions/IndiaNow_Volume1_Issue2_English/files/assets/downloads/page0022.pdf
8.
GhatakM.MookherjeeD. (2011). Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers[WIDER Working Paper]. International Growth Centre.
9.
HertantiR.Ceresna-ChaturvediL. (2012). Working and living conditions in special economic zones. A comparative study between India and Indonesia. http://cividep.org/backdoor/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Working-and-LivingConditions-in-SEZs.pdf
10.
KokkoA.ZejanM.TansiniR. (2001). Trade regimes and spillover effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 137, 124–149.
11.
LevienM. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 454–483.
12.
NielsenK. B. (2010). Contesting India’s development? Industrialisation, land acquisition and protest in West Bengal. Forum for Development Studies, 37(2), 145–170.
13.
ParwezS. (2015). Modified labour welfare measure for special economic zone and implications. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(3), 386–396.
14.
ParwezS. (2016a). Labour and labour welfare in special economic zones in India with special reference to Gujarat. South Asian Survey, 23(2), 1–23.
15.
ParwezS. (2016b). A study on special economic zone implicated land acquisition and utilisation. International Journal of Development and Conflict, 6(2),136–153.
16.
RamachandranH.BiswasD. (2007). Locating land for special economic zones: A methodology. Man & Development, 26(4), 51–64.
17.
ShahA.NandaniD.JoshiH. (2012). Marginalisation or mainstreaming? Evidence from special economic zones in Gujarat[Working Paper No. 210]. Gujarat Institute of Development Research.
18.
SwaminathanP. (2005). The trauma of “wage employment” and the “burden of work” for women in India. In KannabiranK. (Ed.), The violence of normal times: Essays on women’s lived realities. Women Unlimited.
