Land acquisition for commercial purposes in India is mainly a top-down approach that employs instrumental means like fair market valuations. Market forces play a major role in the land transfer process. On many instances, these have led to sustainability challenges, poor stakeholder management, sustainability challenges and subpar business performance. Land since time immemorial has spiritual bearings in India. There have been numerous occasions in the past when land-related sustainability challenges were resolved through spiritual means—most notably the Bhoodān movement. This article is an attempt to offer a bottom-up and socioculturally aligned spiritual means to facilitate land acquisition based on voluntary land transfers. In particular, we conceptualize Bhoodān-based land acquisition (BhaLĀi) which can facilitate voluntary land transfer, creating stakeholder bhalai (well-being in Hindi), spiritually. Implications for research and practice in this regard have been discussed.
AhmedS., & VarshneyA. (2012). Battles half won: Political economy of India’s growth and economic policy since independence. In GhateC. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Indian economy (pp. 56–102). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BalagangadharaS. N. (1994). The heathen in his blindness…: Asia, the West and the dynamic of religion. Leiden, the Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
3.
BardhanP. (2011). Industrialization and the land acquisition conundrum. Development Outreach, 13(1), 54–57.
4.
BhaveA. V. (2005). Bhoodanyagna. In DesaiA. R. (Ed.), Rural sociology in India (pp. 629–632). Mumbai: Popular Prakashan.
5.
BouckaertL., & ZsolnaiL. (2011). Spirituality and business. In BouckaertL. & ZsolnaiL. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of spirituality and business (pp. 3–8). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BrassP. R. (1994). The politics of India since independence (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CarrollJ. E. (2004). Sustainability and spirituality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
8.
ChakravortyS. (2016). Land acquisition in India: The political-economy of changing the law. Area Development and Policy, 1(1), 48–62.
9.
ChakravortyS. (2013). The price of land: acquisition, conflict, consequence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
10.
CollierD. (1995). Translating quantitative methods for qualitative researchers: The case of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 89, 461–466.
11.
CrabtreeS. (2010, 10August. Religiosity highest in world’s poorest nations. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspx
12.
DavisK., & BlomstromR. L. (1971). Business, society and environment: Social power and social response (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
de RooverJ., & BalagangadharaS. N. (2008). John Locke, Christian liberty, and the predicament of liberal toleration. Political Theory, 36(4), 523–549.
14.
Edelman (2019). 2019Edelman trust barometer: Global report. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2019-02/2019_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report.pdf, accessed on 21Jun2019.
15.
ElsterJ. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FernandesW. (2004). Rehabilitation policy for the displaced. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(12), 1191–1193.
17.
FigueroaM. (1997). Bhave, Vinoba (1895–1982). In PowersR. S. & VogeleW. B. (Eds.), Protest, power, and change: An encyclopedia of nonviolent action from ACT-UP to women’s suffrage (pp. 43–44). London: Taylor & Francis.
18.
FoaU. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345–351.
19.
FreemanR. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
20.
GandhiM. K. (2009) Hind Swaraj and other writings, Centenary ed. (ParelA. J., Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GhatakM., & GhoshP. (2011). The land acquisition bill: A critique and a proposal. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(41), 65–72.
22.
HinderyR. (1978). Comparative ethics in Hindu and Buddhist traditions. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
23.
HofstedeG. (1994). The business of international business is culture. International Business Review, 3(1), 1–14.
24.
HowellM. C., & PrevenierW. (2002). From reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
JonesT. M., FelpsW., & BigleyG. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.
26.
KaneP. V. (1941). History of dharmaśāstra: Ancient and medieval religious and civil law (Vol. 2). Poona, India: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
27.
LevienM. (2018). Dispossession without development: Land grabs in neoliberal India. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
LohiaR. (1965). Fragments of a world mind. Calcutta, India: Maitrāyanī.
29.
LuciaA. J. (2014). ‘Give me Sevā overtime’: Selfless service and humanitarianism in Mata Amritanandamayi’s transnational Guru movement. History of Religions, 54, 188–207.
30.
MackeyJ., & SisodiaR. (2013). Conscious capitalism: Liberating the heroic spirit of business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
31.
MariottiC. (2016). ‘Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue’: A critical evaluation of the newest Indian Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Act (2013). In PriceS. & SingerJ. (Eds.), Global implications of development, disasters and climate change: Responses to displacement from Asia Pacific (pp. 74–87). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
McAdamD., McCarthyJ. D., & ZaldM. N. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes: Toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In McAdamD., McCarthyJ. D., & ZaldM. N. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MelkoteS. R., & SteevesH. L. (2001). Communication for development in the third world: Theory and practice for empowerment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
34.
MichaelA., & BaumannM. M. (2016). India and the dialectics of domestic and international ‘land grabbing’: Historical perspectives, current debates, and the case of Ethiopia. India Review, 15(1), 112–135.
35.
MingersJ., & StandingC. (2017). Why things happen: Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms. Information and Organization, 27(1), 171–189.
36.
MishraA. D., & NarayanasamyS. (2009). World crisis and the Gandhian way (Vol. 32). New Delhi: Concept Publishing.
37.
MitchellR. K., AgleB. R., & WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
38.
MunshiD., & KurianP. (2007). The case of the subaltern public: A postcolonial investigation of corporation social responsibility’s (o)missions. In MayS., CheneyG., & RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 438–447). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
NarainV. (2009). Growing city, shrinking hinterland: Land acquisition, transition and conflict in peri-urban Gurgaon, India. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 501–512.
40.
NarayananV. (2005). Hinduism. In TaylorB. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of religion and nature (Vol. 1: A–J, pp. 762–777). New York, NY: Continuum.
41.
NarayanasamyS. (2003). The Sarvodaya movement: Gandhian approach to peace and non-violence. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
42.
NCAS (2005). Advocacy update on land rights, issue 18. New Delhi: National Centre for Advocacy Studies.
43.
NedumparaJ. J. (2004). Political economy and class contradictions: A study. New Delhi: Anmol Publications.
44.
NielsenK. B. (2015). Between peasant utopia and neoliberal dreams: Industrialisation and its discontents in emerging India. In HansenA. & WethalU. (Eds.), Emerging economies and challenges to sustainability: Theories, strategies, local realities (pp. 79–91). New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
PandeB. N. (1996). Aurangzeb and Tipu Sultan: Evaluation of their religious policies. New Delhi: Institute of Objective Studies.
46.
PavaM. L. (2003). Searching for spirituality in all the wrong places. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 393–400.
47.
Planning Commission of India (2014). Data-book compiled for use of Planning Commission. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.nic.in/data/datatable/data_2312/comp_data2312.pdf
48.
PocovnicuA., & VasilacheS. (2012). An interview based assessment of the influence of ethnocentrism in business. Review of International Comparative Management, 13(3), 478–492.
49.
PorterM. E., & KramerM. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
50.
PorwalV., & SinghS. (2011). Land acquisition and determination of land price: A critical appraisal of the existing and proposed normative framework as applied in Singrauli district, Madhya Pradesh. In SomayajiS. & TalwarS. (Eds.), Development-induced displacement, rehabilitation and resettlement in India: Current issues and challenges (pp. 61–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
RambachanA. (2006). The Advaita worldview: God, world, and humanity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
52.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
53.
ReddyS. S., RamP. R., SastryT. V. N., & DeviI. B. (2004). Agricultural economics. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing.
54.
RhodesC. (2010). Invoking Lakshmi: The goddess of wealth in song and ceremony. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
55.
S. K (1958). The land gift movement in India: Vinoba Bhave and his achievement. The World Today, 14(11), 487–495.
56.
SethiS. P. (2002). Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: Challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations. Business and Society Review, 107(1), 20–40.
57.
ShahS., & RamamoorthyV. E. (2014). Soulful corporations: A values-based perspective on corporate social responsibility. New Delhi: Springer Science & Business Media.
58.
SharmaR. S. (1996). Aspects of political ideas and institutions in ancient India. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
59.
SinghK., JainA., & SinghD. (2013). Satsang: A culture specific effective practice for well-being. In MarujoH. Á. & NetoL. M. (Eds.), Positive nations and communities (pp. 79–100). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
60.
SinghR. P. B., & AktorM. (2015). Hinduism and globalization. In BrunnS. D. (Ed.), The changing world religion map: Sacred places, identities, practices and politics (Vol. 3, pp. 1917–1932). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
61.
SoiferD. A. (1991). The myths of Narasimha and Vamana: Two avatars in cosmological perspective. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
62.
StahlG. K., & TungR. L. (2015). Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4), 391–414.
63.
TennysonH. (1955). India’s walking saint: The story of Vinoba Bhave. New York, NY: Doubleday.
64.
Time (1953). A man on foot. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,935318,00.html
65.
Time (1958). Bhoodan & Gramdan. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,894041,00.html
66.
UNESCO (2010). Culture & religion for a sustainable future. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/docs/module_10.doc
67.
WahiN. (2016). Property. In ChoudhryS., KhoslaM., & MehtaP. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the Indian constitution (pp. 943–963). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
68.
WeberT. (2004). Gandhi as disciple and mentor. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WebleyS., & MoreE. (2003). Does business ethics pay?London: Institute of Business Ethics.
70.
WilsonB. H. (1986). Vinoba Bhave’s talks on Gita. In MinorR. N. (Ed.), Modern Indian interpreters of the Bhagavad Gita (pp. 110–130). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
71.
WolpertS. (2001). Gandhi’s passion: The life and legacy of Mahatma Gandhi. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
72.
ZadekS. (2007). The civil corporation (revised ed.). New York, NY: Earthscan.
