This study examines the effect of corporate governance on working capital policy; Aggressive and Conservative of 103 firms listed on Nigeria and Ghana Stock Exchange from 2012 to 2016. This study used a panel data of nonfinancial companies listed on Nigeria and Ghana stock exchange for the period 2012–2016. Data extracted from the annual financial report. Companies with missing data were dropped given a total of 103 companies from both countries (Nigeria and Ghana) with total observation of 510. We discovered that corporate governance on implemented aggressive/conservative working capital policy by firms produced a mixed result. Aggressive working capital policy implementation calls for strict control mechanism to ensure less investment in current assets. Therefore, there is strong corporate governance influence on working capital management of firms that operate aggressive working policy than firms which have implemented conservative working capital policy.
AchchuthanS.KajananthanR. others (2013). Corporate governance practices and working capital management efficiency: Special reference to listed manufacturing companies in SriLanka. Information and Knowledge Management, 3(2), 216–226. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31072674/kaja_send.pdf
2.
AkramH. M. I.AamerS.ImtiazA. (2018). The impact of corporate governance on the efficiency of working capital management of manufacturing firms listed on amman stock exchange. The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 24(4): 339–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00447.x
3.
AldamenH.DuncanK.KellyS. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. 9th International Conference on Corporate Governance, 52, 971–1000.
4.
ArellanoM.BondS. (1991). Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
5.
BebchukL. A.WeisbachM. S. (2009). The state of corporate governance research. Working Paper No. 15537. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, November. https://www.nber.org/papers/w15537.pdf
6.
CaramanisC.LennoxC. (2008). Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 116–138. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.05.00.
7.
CornettM. M.MarcusA. J.SaundersA.TehranianH. (2003). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Working Paper. Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, 7 November. doi:org/10.2139/ssrn.46880.
8.
DetthamrongU.ChancharatN.VithessonthiC. (2017). Research in international business and finance corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance : Evidence from Thailand. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 689–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.011
9.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. doi: 10.1086/467037
10.
GillA.BigerN.MandH. S.ShahC. (2012). Corporate governance and capital structure of small business service firms in India. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(8), 83–92.
11.
GillA. S.BigerN. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on working capital management efficiency of American manufacturing firms. Managerial Finance, 39(2), 116–132. doi: 10.1108/03074351311293981
12.
HarrisM.RavivA. (2006). A theory of board control and size by a theory of board control and size. Review of Financial Studies, 21(773), 1797–1832. doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl030
13.
JacklingB.JohlS. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.
14.
JensenM. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow , corporate finance , and takeovers agency. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
15.
KamauS. M.BaswetiK. A. (2013). The relationship between corporate governance and working capital management efficiency of firms listed at the nairobi securities exchange. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(19), 2222–2847.
16.
Kyereboah-colemanA.AdjasiC. K. D.AborJ. (2007). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from ghanaian listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2), 123–132.
17.
MuniandyB.HillierJ. (2015). Board independence , investment opportunity set and performance of South African fi rms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.11.003
18.
NazirM. S.AfzaT. (2009). A panel data analysis of working capital management policies. Business Review, 4(1), 143–157.
19.
PaniaguaJ.RivellesR.SapenaJ. (2018). Corporate governance and fi nancial performance : The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89, 229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.060
20.
RoseC. (2016). Firm performance and comply or explain disclosure in corporate governance. European Management Journal, 1(21). doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.03.00.
21.
SanjaiB.BoltonB. (2007). Corporate governance and firm performance. Working Paper. Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado, Colorado, April. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2369/873de26bfc2fcee4c4264cb842db877688b7.pdf
