This article decries the normative projection of education as a means of only securing livelihood for the poor. Applying Honneth’s idea on the struggle for recognition, it develops an understanding of whether and in what way education contributes to the intersubjective recognition of the abilities and achievements of the poor. The premise is that the notion of the self is constitutive of the interaction with others. Drawing upon interviews with the poor and ethnographic fieldnotes, it shows that the poor associate education with intersubjective recognition, that is, with a sense of being recognised, of being counted as an asset in society. It establishes that education inspires self-respect as also the potential and boldness to relate oneself as an equal participant in the exchange of opinions and discussions regarding public affairs.
AndersonJ. (1995). Translator’s introduction. In HonnethA. (Ed.), The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
2.
AppleM. W. (2007). Social movements and political practice in education. Theory and Research in Education, 5(2), 161–171.
3.
AssariS. (2018). Parental education better helps white than black families escape poverty: National survey of children’s health. Economies, 6(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020030
4.
BallS. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatizing education policy, privatizing educational research: Network governance and the competition state. Journal of Educational Policy, 42(1), 83–99.
5.
BatraP. (2014). Quality of education and the poor. In Working Papers of the Max Weber Foundation’s Transnational Research Group India Poverty Reduction and Policy for the Poor between the State and Private Actors: Education Policy in India since the Nineteenth Century.
6.
BeckerG. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1976). The school as a conservative force. In DaleR., EslandG., & MacdonaldM. (Eds.), Schooling and capitalism. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8.
BourdieuP., & PasseronJ.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage Publications.
9.
ChienC.-L., MontjouridèsP., & van der PolH. (2017). Global trends of access to equity in postsecondary education. In Mountford-ZimdersA. & HarrisonN. (Eds.), Access to higher education. Routledge.
10.
ColemanJ. S., CampbellE. Q., HobsonC. J., McPartlandJ., MoodA., WeinfeldF. D., & YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Government Printing Office.
11.
DaviesB., & HentschkeG. (2005). Public/private partnerships in education: Grounds for optimism?Management in Education, 19(1), 6–7.
12.
DumènilG., & LevyD. (2013). The crisis of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.
13.
GoldinC., & KatzL. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press.
14.
HasleyA. H., HeathA. F., & RidgeJ. M. (1980). Origins and destinations: Family, class and education in modern Britain. Clarendon Press.
15.
HavemanR., & SmeedingT. (2006). The role of higher education in social mobility. The Future of Children, 16(2), 125–150.
16.
HeidegrenC.-G. (2004). Recognition and social theory. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(4), 365–373.
17.
HonnethA. (1992). Integrity and disrespect: Principles of a conception of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187–201.
18.
HonnethA. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
19.
HopkinsL., & SriprakashA. (2016). Unsettling the global child: Rethinking child subjectivity in education and international development. In HopkinsL. & SriprakashA. (Eds.), The ‘poor child’: The cultural politics of education, development and childhood. Routledge.
JainP., & DholakiaR. (2009). Feasibility of implementation of Right to Education Act. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(25), 38–43.
22.
JainM., & SaxenaS. (2010). Politics of low cost schooling and low teacher salary. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(18), 79–80.
23.
KingdonG. G. (2000). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(10), 1795–1817.
24.
KumarR. (2016). Introduction. In KumarR. (Ed.), Neoliberalism, critical pedagogy and education. Routledge.
25.
LipmanP. (1998). Race, class, and power in school restructuring. State University of New York Press.
26.
LynchK. (1995). Equality and resistance in higher education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5(1), 93–111.
27.
LynchK. (1999). Equality studies, the academy and the role of research in emancipatory social change. The Economic and Social Review, 30(1), 41–69.
28.
McCowanT. (2011). Human rights, capabilities and the normative basis of ‘Education for All’. Theory and Research in Education, 9(3), 283–298.
29.
MoonV. (1979). Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and speeches. Education Department, Government of Maharashtra.
30.
NambissanG. B. (2002). Educational deprivation and primary school provision—A study of providers in the city of Calcutta(IDS Working Paper 187). Brighton Institute of Development Studies.
31.
NambissanG. B. (2012). Private schools for the poor: Business as usual?Economic & Political Weekly, 47(41), 51–58.
32.
NambissanG. B. (2021). The changing urban and education in Delhi: Privilege and exclusion in a megacity. Education and the urban in India(Working Paper Series 2021/9). Max Weber Stiftung.
33.
NambissanG. B., & BallS. J. (2010). Advocacy networks, choice and private schooling of the poor in India. Global Networks, 10(3), 324–343.
34.
NarayanD. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us?Oxford University Press.
35.
OrtnerS. (2005). Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory, 5(1), 32–52.
36.
RainaJ. (2020). Introduction. In RainaJ. (Ed.), Elementary education in India: Policy shifts, issues and challenges. Routledge.
37.
SarangpaniP. (2009). Quality, feasibility and desirability of low cost private schooling. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(43), 67–69.
SarangpaniP. (2018). Hyderabad’s education market. In JainM., MehendaleA., MukhopadhyayR., SarangpaniP., & WinchC. (Eds.), School education in India: Market state and quality. Routledge.
40.
SenA. (1983a). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153–169.
41.
SenA. (1983b). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlements and deprivation. Clarendon Press.
42.
SenA. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
43.
SharmaG. (2021). Schooling and aspirations in the urban margins: Ethnography of education in the Indian context. Routledge.
44.
SlaughterS., & RhoadesG. (2004). Academic capitalism in the new economy. John Hopkins University Press.
45.
The World Bank. (2018). World Development Report: Learning to realize education’s promise. http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018
46.
TilakJ. B. G. (2003). Higher education and development in Asia. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, XVII(2), 151–173.
47.
TooleyJ. (2007). Educating amaretch: Private schools for the poor and the new frontier for investors. Economic Affairs, 27(2), 37–43.
48.
TooleyJ. (2009). The beautiful tree: A personal journey into how the world’s poorest people are educating themselves. Penguin.
49.
VaidD. (2016). Patterns of social mobility and the role of education in India. Contemporary South Asia, 24(3), 285–312.
50.
VelaskarP. (2010). Quality and inequality in Indian education: Some critical policy concerns. Education Dialogue Concerns, 7(1), 58–93.
WoessmannL. (2015). The economic case for education. Education Economics, 24(1), 3–32. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09645292.2015.1059801?journalCode=cede20
53.
YunusR. (2022). Labour class’ children in Indian classrooms: Theorizing urban poverty and schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(1), 104–119.
