The Musahar community in Bihar experienced a series of identity constructions in the last couple of centuries. The lingering impact of the identity constructions is deeply rooted in society as the upper castes stigmatised the entire community in Bihar. The critical engagement with the colonial archives put forward various strands of their identity constructions, such as ‘rat eating’, ‘timid’, ‘semi-Hinduised’, ‘servile caste’ and many more. In this backdrop, the article examines the way in which the Musahar identity was constructed and reinforced during the colonial period. It further comprehends the relationships between the Musahar identity and their material conditions in Bihar. The prevalence of labour servitude in Bihar and its association with Musahars reflects a socio-economic reality where the community was forced to survive as a ‘rat eater’ in a caste-ridden society. With help from the content analysis, the archival records like survey reports, census reports, monographs, ethnographic accounts, along with a few other relevant documents, are critically assessed to understand the magnitude of the Musahar identity and their socioeconomic conditions in colonial Bihar.
AmbedkarB. R.2014. ‘The Hindu Social Order: Its Essential Principles’. In NarakeH. (Ed.), Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches (vol. 3, 2nd edition), 106–7. Dr. Ambedkar Foundation.
2.
AppaduraiA.1993. ‘Number in Colonial Imagination’. In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia, edited by BreckenridgeCarol A. and van der VeerPeter, 314–40. University of Pennsylvania University Press.
3.
AzizS.2017. ‘National Archive of India: The Colonisation of Knowledge and Politics of Preservation’. Economic & Political WeeklyLII(50): 34–36.
4.
BeverleyH.1872. Report on the Census of Bengal. The Bengal Secretariat Press.
5.
BeverleyH.1874. ‘The Census of Bengal’. The Journal of Statistical Society of London, 37(1): 83–84.
6.
BhattacharjeeJ. B.2005–2006. ‘The First Partition of Bengal’. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 66: 1022–9.
7.
BuchananH.1928. An Account of the District of Purnea in 1809–10. The Bihar and Orissa Research Society.
8.
Census of India. 1901. The Lower Provinces of Bengal and their Feudatories: Part I Report (vol. VI). Bengal Secretariat Press.
9.
Census of India. 1911. Part 1 Report (vol. 1). Superintendent Government Printing.
10.
ChoudharyP. K., and Shrikant. 2015. Swarg Per Dhawa: Bihar me Dalit Andolan 1912–2000. Vani Prakashan.
11.
CohnB. S.1996. Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton University Press.
12.
CohnB. S.1998. An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays. Oxford University Press.
13.
DasguptaS.2019. ‘The “Tribe” in Colonial and Post-independence India’. Politeja, 2(59): 107–21.
14.
DirksN. B.2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Permanent Black.
15.
DirksN. B.2015. Autobiography of an Archive: A Scholar Passage to India. Columbia University Press.
16.
GhaiR., MishraA. K., and KumarS.. 2020. ‘Introduction’. In The Marginalised Self: The Tales of Resistance of a Community, edited by GhaiRahul, MishraArvind Kumar, and KumarSanjay, 1–28. Primus Books.
17.
GriersonG. A.1885. ‚Selected Specimens of the Bihari Language’. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 39(4): 617–73.
18.
HassanS.2014. From Misery to Hope? Musahars, Power and the State in India. Centre for Equity Studies: Working Paper Series. New Delhi.
19.
HoultonJ.1948. Bihar: The Heart of India. Orient Longman.
20.
JacksonV. H.1925. Journal of Francis Buchanan (Afterwards Hamilton): Kept During the Survey of the Districts of Patna and Gaya in 1811–12. Superintendent Government Printing, Bihar and Orissa.
21.
KunnathG.2013. ‘Compliance and Defiance? The Case of Dalits and Mahadalits’. URL, consulted November10, 2023, https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/anthro/documents/media/jaso5_1_2013_36_59.pdf
22.
LaceyW. G. (1933). The Census of India. 1931. Bihar and Orissa, Part 1 Report (vol. VII). Superintendent Government Printing.
23.
LockwoodE.1878. Natural History, Sport, and Travel. William H. Allen and Co.
24.
NarayanB.2008. ‘Demarginalisation and History: Dalit Re-invention of the Past’. South Asia Research, 28(2): 168–84.
25.
NesfieldJ. C.1888. ‘The Musheras in Central and Upper India’. The Calcutta ReviewCLXXI (171) (January): 1–53.
26.
O’MalleyL. S. S.1909. Bengal District Gazetteers: Monghyr. The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot.
27.
O’MalleyL. S. S.1932. Indian Caste Customs. Cambridge University Press.
28.
PandeyG.1995. ‘Voices from the Edge: The Struggle to Write Subaltern Histories’. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 60(3): 223–42.
29.
PrakashG.2007. Bonded Histories: Genealogy of the Labour Servitude in Colonial India (South Asia edition). Cambridge University Press.
30.
PunekarS. D., and VarickayiR.. 1989. Labour Movement in India (vol. I). Popular Prakashan.
31.
RawatR. S., and SatyanarayanaK.. 2017. ‘Dalit Studies: New Perspective on Indian History and Society’. In Dalit Studies, edited by RawatRamnarayan Singh and SatyanarayanaKusuma, 18. Permanent Black.
32.
Reports from the Indian Law Commissioners Relating to Slavery in the East Indies. 1841. Consulted the Archive.Org. [URL]. https://ia601503.us.archive.org/22/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.94510/2015.94510.Report-From-The-Indian-Law-Commissioners-Relating-To-Slavery-In-The-East-Indies.pdf
33.
RisleyH. H.1892a. The Tribes and Castes of Bengal: Ethnographic Glossary (vol. I). Bengal Secretariat Press.
34.
RisleyH. H.1892b. The Tribes and Castes of Bengal: Ethnographic Glossary (vol. II). Bengal Secretariat Press.
35.
RisleyH. H.1915. The People of India. Thacker Spink & Co.
36.
RouseW. H. D.1922. The Talking Thrush and Other Tales from India. Collected by CrookeW. and Retold by RouseW. H. D.. G. M. Dent and Sons. Ltd.
37.
SahayG.2019. ‘Substantially Present but Invisible, Excluded and Marginalised: A Study on Musahars in Bihar’. Sociological Bulletin, 68(1): 25–43.
38.
SamarendraP.2011. ‘Census in Colonial India and the Birth of Caste’. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(33): 51–58.
39.
SaraswatiS.2005. ‘The Kamiyas and Usury as Loot’. In Swami Sahajanand and the Peasants of Jharkhand: A View From 1941, edited by HuaserWalter, 134–35. Manohar Publishers and Distributors.
40.
SentillesR. M.2005. ‘Toiling in the Archives of Cyberspace’. In Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions and the Writing of History, edited by BurtonAntoinette, 136–56. Duke University Press.
41.
SinghK. S.2002. ‘Musahar Community, Context, and Equality’. In Asserting Voices: Changing Culture, Identity, and Livelihood of the Musahars in the Gangetic Plains, edited by JoshiHamant and KumarSanjay, 133–5. Deshkal Publication.
