Crafting imaginative stories can be transformative, offering an alternate view of oneself. When university students wrote alter-ego origin superhero stories and mentored elementary students, they engaged in a range of reflective and authoring practices. These vulnerable acts of being open allowed them to agentively explore their past, present, and imagine a different future. In this qualitative case study, we asked, “What is the nature of vulnerability, agency, and imagination as evidenced in a service-learning composition course?” Undergraduate education majors acted as mentors and wrote alongside fifth graders in an after-school writing club. Rather than tutoring, the mentors focused on recognizing and amplifying the fifth graders’ confidence and talents as writers. During three pre-Writing Club class meetings, three instructors furthered the mentors’ understanding of bias, privilege, and systemic oppression. The instructors’ interactions with university students aligned with a humanist Pedagogy of Vulnerability. Students can continue to learn about systemic inequities through self-reflective and agentive university literacy experiences, including having sustained time and spaces for discussion.
AukermanM.JohnsonE. M.SchuldtL. C. (2017). Reciprocity of student and teacher discourse practices in monologically and dialogically organized text discussion. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 13(2), 1–52.
2.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Dismantling anti-black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist black language pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 59(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665415
BenjaminR. (2024). Imagination: A manifesto. W.W. Norton & Company.
5.
BrantmeierE. (2013). Pedagogy of vulnerability: Definitions, assumptions, and applications. In LinJ.OxfordR.BrantmeierE. (Eds.), Re-envisioning higher education: Embodied pathways to wisdom and transformation (pp. 95–106). Information Age Publishing.
6.
ButlerJ.GambettiZ.SabsayL. (2016). Vulnerability in resistance. Duke University Press.
7.
Cervantes-SoonC. (2024). Building new futurities from the margins: Reading and writing a reimagined world. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 23(3), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2024.2324278
8.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. Minton, Balch & Company.
9.
DutroE. (2019). The vulnerable heart of literacy: Centering trauma as powerful pedagogy. Teachers College Press.
10.
EncisoP. (2017). Stories lost and found: Mobilizing imagination in literacy research and practice. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917718813
11.
EncisoP.KroneB.SolangeG. (2023). Re-imagining community and school through youth and artists’ critical superhero storytelling. Social Sciences, 12(6), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12060363
12.
Faulstich OrellanaM. (2016). Immigrant children in transcultural space. Routledge.
13.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
14.
GallagherK.AllenA. A.BaltC. (2024). Harnessing speculative fiction to reimagine and rewrite our relationships to the climate crisis and the future of our local environments. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 29(2), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2024.2312193
15.
GoiaE.HoffmanJ. V.ModestoH.NgomaneJ.SailorsM.SitoeA. (2019). Re-imagining primary teacher preparation in Moçambique: Introducing literacy mentoring as a transformative practice in Institutos de Formação de Professores. Global Education Review, 6(2), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18129.58723
16.
GoldblattE. (2017). Don’t call it expressivism: Legacies of a “tacit tradition.”. College Composition & Communication, 68(3), 438–465. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201728962
17.
GreeneM. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey Bass Publishers.
18.
HoffmanJ. V.Mosley WetzelM.DeJulioS. (2018). Multiple literacy tutoring experiences across a teacher preparation program: How can practice in hybrid spaces challenge the “practice makes practice” dilemma?Action in Teacher Education, 40(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1424660
19.
HoffmanJ. V.SvrcekN.LammertC.Daly-LeschA.SteinitzE.GreeterE.DeJulioS. (2019). A research review of literacy tutoring and mentoring in initial teacher preparation: Toward practices that can transform teaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/10862
20.
hooksB. (1994). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
LangleyS.MacGillivrayL. (2024, April 11–14). Service-learning and an undergraduate’s agency and vulnerability in an afterschool writing club with fifth graders. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Philadelphia.
Luce-KaplerR. (2004). Writing with, through, and beyond the text: An ecology of language. Routledge.
26.
MacGillivrayL.WalkerB.LangleyS.Owens-PearsonK.SeraphinW.WorthenJ. (2025). “Like a slap in the face, but a good one”: A service-learning project and a student’s agency, and vulnerability in an after-school fifth-grade writing club. Journal of Service-Learning in Higher Education, 20, 52–72.
27.
MapalingC.HoelsonC. N. (2022). Humanising pedagogy within higher education: A ten-year scoping literature review. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 6(3), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v6i3
28.
McKennaM. K.BrantmeierE. J. (Eds.) (2020). Pedagogy of vulnerability. Information Age Publishing.
29.
MilesM.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Sage.
30.
MitchellT. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 14(2), 50–65. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ831374.pdf
31.
MuhammadG. (2014). Focus on middle school: Black girls write!: Literary benefits of a summer writing collaborative grounded in history. Childhood Education, 90(4), 323–326. httpsss://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.937321
32.
OllerenshawJ.CreswellJ. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004008003008
33.
PelapratE.ColeM. (2011). “Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integrated Psychological Behavior, 45, 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9176-5
34.
PinterR. C. (2017). The transformative practice of writing and teaching writing. The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, 22, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.7290/jaepl22m7rg
35.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publishers.
SullivanF. J.LyonA.LebofskyD.WellsS.GoldblattE. (1997). Student needs and strong composition: The dialectics of writing program reform. College Composition & Communication, 48(3), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc19973155
38.
SumaraD. (2002). Why reading literature in school still matters: Imagination, interpretation, insight. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39.
TaylorL. A. (2019). Negotiating discourses of curriculum and time: Tensions of humanizing and dehumanizing discourses in an urban elementary school. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(2-3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1656564
ToliverS. R. (2020). Can I get a witness? Speculative fiction as testimony and counterstory. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20966362
42.
ToliverS. R. (2021). Freedom dreaming in a broken world: The Black radical imagination in Black girls’ science fiction stories. Research in the Teaching of English, 56(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131344
43.
VetterA. (2010). Positioning students as readers and writers through talk in a high school English classroom. English Education, 43(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee201011787
44.
WhiteM.EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. W.W. Norton & Co.
