Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing on multiple case study methods, this article examines how two elementary teachers in differing classroom contexts (English as a second language and English medium) enacted and adapted literacy instruction for their multilingual learner (ML) students. We analyze their practice in relation to approaches to teaching reading informed by the science of reading (SoR) movement. Specifically, we ask: (1) What literacy instructional practices did teachers enact and/or adapt to support their MLs? and (2) How did those practices align or not align with current approaches to literacy instruction informed by SoR discourse? To examine these cases, we adopt a social literacies perspective that allows us to consider how autonomous and ideological conceptions of literacy are negotiated through reading instruction. Our findings show that in negotiating these approaches teachers made curricular adaptations with autonomy and flexibility. Collectively, the experiences of these teachers demonstrated their (1) stance toward MLs, (2) expertise to adapt the curricula, and (3) agency to adapt curricula allowed them to enact ML-centered pedagogy. We discuss implications for literacy stakeholders working with MLs (teachers, literacy coaches, school and district administration), arguing for institutional change that supports the design and adaption of literacy instruction in ways that center MLs’ assets, needs, and experiences.

Keywords

literacy bilingualism multilingual learners science of reading

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ascenzi-Moreno

(2018). Translanguaging and responsive assessment adaptations: Emergent bilingual readers through the lens of possibility. Language Arts, 95(6), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201829683

Ascenzi-Moreno

(2025). Beyond the science of reading: How bilingual teachers mediate foundational reading pedagogies. Language Arts, 102(26).

(2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815614916

Aukerman

Chambers Schuldt

(2021). What matters most? Toward a robust and socially just science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(51), S85–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.406

Aydarova

(2024). What you see is not what you get: Science of reading reforms as a guise for standardization, centralization, and privatization. American Journal of Education, 130(4), 653–685. https://doi.org/10.1086/730991

Baker-Bell

(2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.

Bishop

R. S.

(1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6(3), ix–xi.

Bloome, D. & Beauchemin, F. (2018). Classroom ethnography. International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1–10.

Calkins

(2018). Units of study. Heinemann.

10.

Charity Hudley

A. H.

Mallinson

(2010). Understanding English language variation in U. S. schools. Teachers College Press.

11.

Clemens

N. H.

Solari

Kearns

D. M.

Fien

Nelson

N. J.

Stelega

Hoeft

(2021). They say you can do phonemic awareness instruction “in the dark”, but should you? A critical evaluation of the trend toward advanced phonemic awareness training. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ajxbv

12.

Cochran-Smith

Lytle

S. L.

(2015). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.

13.

Compton-Lilly

Spence

L. K.

Thomas

P. L.

Decker

S. L.

(2023). Stories grounded in decades of research: What we truly know about the teaching of reading. The Reading Teacher, 77(3), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2258

14.

Daffodil Hill Press. (n.d.). Little books with big heart: Making decodable texts and instructional resources that are good for teachers, good for kids and good for our world. Retrieved July 10, 2025, from https://daffodilhillpress.com/

15.

Diaz

(2021). Paletero man. Harper Collins.

16.

Duke

N. K.

Cartwright

K. B.

(2021). The Science of Reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(51), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

17.

Duke

N. K.

Lindsey

J. B.

Wise

C. N.

(2023). Feeding two birds with one hand: Instructional simultaneity in foundational Reading instruction. In Cabell

Neuman

S. B.

Terry

S. P.

(Eds.), Handbook on the science of early literacy (pp. 186–195).

18.

Duke

N. K.

Mesmer

H. A. E.

(2018–2019, Winter). Phonics faux pas: Avoiding instructional missteps in teaching letter–sound relationships. American Educator, 42(4), 12–16. https://www.aft.org/ae/winter2018-2019/duke_mesmer

19.

Elson

Pennell

Jordan

R. P.

Nash

K. T.

Trathen

(2024). Incorporating decodable books into an early grades literacy curriculum: Tensions and new learnings from one teacher. The Reading Teacher, 77(6), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2293

20.

Emerson

R. M.

Fretz

R. I.

Shaw

L. L.

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.

21.

Enfield

N. J.

Kockelman

(Eds.). (2017). Distributed agency. Oxford University Press.

22.

Escamilla

Hopewell

Butvilofsky

Sparrow

Soltero-Gonzales

Ruiz-Figueroa

Escamilla

(2014). Biliteracy from the start: Literacy squared in action. Brookes.

23.

Espinosa

C. M.

Ascenzi-Moreno

(2021). Rooted in strength: Using translanguaging to grow multilingual readers and writers. Scholastic.

24.

Gabriel

López

(2024). The role of asset-based pedagogy in an interactive view of reading. Educational Psychologist, 59(4), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2024.2394031

25.

García

Johnson

S. I.

Seltzer

(2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Caslon.

26.

García

Kleifgen

J. A.

(2020). Translanguaging and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.286

27.

Gough

P. B.

Tunmer

W. E.

(1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

28.

Grote-Garcia

Ortlieb

Cardona

S. L.

(2025). What’s hot in literacy: Misguided trends in a divided field. Literacy Research and Instruction, 64(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2024.2409130

29.

Handsfield

L. J.

Crumpler

T. P.

Dean

T. R.

(2010). Tactical negotiations and creative adaptations: The discursive production of literacy curriculum and teacher identities across space-times. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.3

30.

HarperKids. (2021, June 17). How to make paletas: Paletero man by Lucky Diaz [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyXN5DCXVE0

31.

Heath

S. B.

(1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

32.

Heath

S. B.

Street

B. V.

(2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.

33.

Herrera

de Jong

(2023). English literacy for multilingual learners: Voices from the field. Language Magazine. https://www.languagemagazine.com/2023/05/22/english-literacy-for-multilingual-learners-voices-from-the-field/

34.

Herrera

Perez

Escamilla

(2014). Teaching reading to English language learners (2nd ed.). Pearson.

35.

Larson

Duret

Rees

Anderson

(2021). Challenging the autonomous wall: Literacy work in an urban high school. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(2), 174–195.

36.

Larson

Marsh

(2015). Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching. Sage.

37.

Lawson

(2024). “We can draw and think about it ourselves”: Putting culture and race in phonics reading research. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.524

38.

Leider

C. M.

Proctor

C. P.

(2024). Toward a dynamic idiolect: Multilingual perspectives on the “science of reading”. Educational Psychologist, 59(4), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2024.2394026

39.

Marek

M. C.

Godfrey

(2024). Elementary preservice teachers’ experiences at the intersection of culturally sustaining and historically responsive pedagogy, early literacy, and the science of Reading. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 73(1), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381337724128583

40.

Mesmer

(2020, September 24). Fear not the decodable: Why? When? How? Heinemann Blogpost. https://blog.heinemann.com/fear-not-the-decodable-why-when-how

41.

Mesmer

H. A.

Kambach

(2022). Beyond labels and agendas: Research teachers need to know about phonics and phonological awareness. The Reading Teacher, 76(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2102

42.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

43.

Milner

(2020). Disrupting racism and whiteness in researching a science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S249–S253. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.347

44.

Moll

L. C.

Amanti

Neff

Gonzales

(1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

45.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). English learners in public schools. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved July 10, 2025, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgf

46.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). National Reading Panel. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook

47.

Noguerón-Liu

(2020). Expanding the knowledge base in literacy instruction and assessment: Biliteracy and translanguaging perspectives from families, communities, and classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S307–S318. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.354

48.

Nuñez

(2021). “Because we have to speak English at school”: Transfronterizx children translanguaging identity to cross the academic border. Research in the Teaching of English, 56(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131341

49.

O’Connor

M. C.

Michaels

(1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1993.24.4.04x0063k

50.

Orange County Department of Education (OCDE). (n.d.). Project GLAD® Guided Language Acquisition Design. https://ocde.us/NTCProjectGLAD/Pages/default.aspx

51.

Paris

Alim

H. S.

(2017). What is culturally sustaining pedagogy and why does it matter? In Paris

Alim

H. S.

(Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 1–24). Teachers College Press.

52.

Razfar

Rumenapp

J. C.

(2014). Applying linguistics in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.

53.

The Reading League & the National Committee for Effective Literacy. (2023). Understanding the difference: The science of reading and implementation for English Learners/Emergent Bilinguals (ELs/EBs). [Joint statement]. https://www.thereadingleague.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Joint-Statement-on-the-Science-of-Reading-and-English-Learners_Emergent-Bilinguals-20.pdf

54.

Saldaña

Aydarova

(2025). NEPC talks education: An interview with Elena Aydarova about reading instruction. National Educational Policy Center. [Audio Podcast] https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/podcast-saldana-aydarova

55.

Scholastic. (2005). Our stories decodables: It’s never too early to read about someone like you. https://education.scholastic.com/education/programs/our-stories-decodables.html

56.

D. L.

(2021). Is the science of reading just the science of reading English? Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S391–S402. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.401

57.

Snow

(2023). To weather the “literacy crisis,” do what works. Harvard Graduate School of Education. [Audio Podcast] https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/edcast/23/03/weather-literacy-crisis-do-what-works

58.

Souto-Manning

Ghim

Madu

N. K.

(2021). Toward early literacy as a site of belonging. The Reading Teacher, 74(5), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1992

59.

Street

B. V.

(1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. Routledge.

60.

Street

B. V.

(1999). The meanings of literacy. In Wagner

D. A.

Venezky

R. L.

Street

B. V.

(Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook. Westview Press.

61.

Taffola

(2009). What can you do with a paleta? Tricycle Press.

62.

Taylor

L. A.

(2019). Negotiating discourses of curriculum and time: Tensions of humanizing and dehumanizing discourses in an urban elementary school. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(2–3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1656564

63.

Tierney

R. J.

Pearson

P. D.

(2024). Fact-checking the science of reading: Opening up the conversation. Literacy Research Commons. https://literacyresearchcommons.org

64.

Washington

J. A.

Seidenberg

M. S.

(2021, Summer). Teaching reading to African American children: When home and school language differ. American Educator, 45(2), 26–33. https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2021/washington_seidenberg

65.

Whitley

M. S.

(2002). Spanish/English contrasts: A course in Spanish linguistics. Georgetown University Press.

66.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Negotiating Current Approaches to Literacy Instruction and Policies with Multilingual Learners: A Comparative Case Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References