An Examination of Dyslexia Research and Instruction With Policy Implications

Hoffman J. V. Hikida M. Sailors M. (2020). Contesting science that silences: Amplifying equity, agency, and design research in literacy teacher preparation. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S255–S266. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.353

Shanahan T. (2020). What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S235–S247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.349

Youman M. Mather N. (2018). Dyslexia laws in the USA: A 2018 update. Perspectives on language and literacy, 44(2), 37–41. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2082576564?accountid=14166

International Dyslexia Association. (2018, July 16). Definition of Dyslexia. https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/

International Dyslexia Association. (2018, October 23). IDA/LDA Whitepaper.

Elliott J. G. (2020). It’s time to be scientific about dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S61–S75. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.333

Department of Education 34 CFR, PART 300—Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities, Part II. (2006). Federal Register, Page 46757, vol.71, no. 156, §300.8, 10, ii. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2006-08-14/pdf/06-6656.pdf

Sleeter C. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53(1), 46–54.

Elliott J. G. Grigorenko E. L. (2014). The end of dyslexia? Psychologist, 27(8), 576–580.

Elliott J. G. Grigorenko E. L. (2014). The dyslexia debate. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Gabrieli J. D. E. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325(5938), 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171999

Fletcher J. M. Lyon G. R. Fuchs L. S. Barnes M. A . (2019). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Siegel L. S. Mazabel S . (2013). Basic cognitive processes and reading disabilities. In Swanson H. L. Harris K. R. Graham S. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 186–213). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Carroll J. M. Solity J. Shapiro L. R. (2016). Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills: The role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 57(6), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12488

Peterson R. L. Pennington B. F. (2015). Developmental dyslexia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112842

Cowen C. D. Sherman G. F. (2015, August 13). Upside of dyslexia? Science scant, but intriguing. International Dyslexia Association. https://dyslexiaida.org/upside-of-dyslexia/

Cowen C. (2017, September 16). Is dyslexia a gift? Infographic. International Dyslexia Association. https://dyslexiaida.org/is-dyslexia-a-gift-infographic/

Signs of dyslexia. The Yale Center for Dyslexia & Creativity. http://dyslexia.yale.edu/dyslexia/signs-of-dyslexia/

Maher P. J. (2015, March 25). SDE releases new “working definition” of dyslexia for special education eligibility. School Law. https://www.ctschoollaw.com/2015/03/sde-releases-new-working-definition-of-dyslexia-for-special-education-eligibility/

Lovett M. W. Wolf M. Frijters J. C. Steinbach K. A. Sevcik R. A. Morris R. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181

Wanzek J. Vaughn S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.

Grigorenko E. L. Compton D. L. Fuchs L. S. Wagner R. K. Willcutt E. G. Fletcher J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452

Mathes P. G. Denton C. A. Fletcher J. M. Anthony J. L. Francis D. J. Schatschneider C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 148–182. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.40.2.2

Scanlon D. M. Vellutino F. R. Small S. G. Fanuele D. P. Sweeney J. M. (2005). Severe reading difficulties, can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13(4), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1304_3

Wanzek J. Vaughn S. Scammacca N. Gatlin B. Walker M. A. Capin P . (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of Tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7

vanDerHeyden A. M. Burns M. K. (2017). Four dyslexia screening myths that cause more harm than good in preventing reading failure and what you can do instead. Communique, 45(7), 25–28.

Gaab N. (2018, July 10). It’s a myth that young children cannot be screened for dyslexia! International Dyslexia Association. https://dyslexiaida.org/its-a-myth-that-young-children-cannot-be-screened-for-dyslexia/

Ritchey K. D. Goeke J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030501

Stevens E. A. Austin C. Moore C. Scammacca N. Boucher A. Vaughn S . (2021). Current state of the evidence: Examining the effects of Orton Gillingham reading interventions for students with or at risk for word-level reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0014402921993406

Torgesen J. Schirm A. Castner L. Vartivarian S. Mansfield W. Myers D. Stancavage F. Durno D. Javorsky R. Haan C. (2007). National assessment of Title I, final report: Volume II: Closing the reading gap, findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers (NCEE 2008-4013). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Silberberg N. Iversen I. Goins J. (1973). Which remedial reading method works best? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 18–27.

Malchow H. (2015, May 9). Structured literacy: A new term to unify us and sell what we do. International Dyslexia Association. https://dyslexiaida.org/structured-literacy/

Bowers J. S. (2020). Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-019-09515-Y

Petscher Y. Cabell S. Q. Catts H. W. Compton D. L. Foorman B. R. Hart S. A. Lonigan C. J. Phillips B. M. Schatschneider C. Steacy L. M. Terry N. P. Wagner R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st‐century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S267–S282. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352

Scammacca N. K. Roberts G. Vaughn S. Stuebing K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4 -12: 1980-2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504995

Stuebing K. K. Barth A. E. Cirino P. T. Francis D. J. Fletcher J. M. (2008). A response to recent reanalyses of the National Reading Panel Report: Effects of systematic phonics instruction are practically significant. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 123–134. https://doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.123

Camilli G. Wolfe M. Smith M. L. (2006). Meta-analysis and reading policy: Perspectives on teaching children to read. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/509525

Shanahan T. Lonigan C. (2010). The National Early Literacy Panel: A summary of the process and the report. Educational Researcher, 39(4), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10369172

Foorman B. Beyler N. Borradaile K. Coyne M. Denton C. A. Dimino J. Furgeson J. Hayes L. Henke J. Justice L. Keating B. Lewis W. Sattar S. Streke A. Wagner R. Wissel S . (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://whatworks.ed.gov

Scanlon D. M. Anderson K. L. (2020). Using context as an assist in word solving: The contributions of 25 years of research on the interactive strategies approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S19–S34. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.335

Ouellette G. Sénéchal M. (2017). Invented spelling in kindergarten as a predictor of reading and spelling in grade 1: A new pathway to literacy, or just the same road, less known? Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000179

Sénéchal M. (2017). Testing a nested skills model of the relations among invented spelling, accurate spelling, and word reading, from kindergarten to grade 1. Early Child Development & Care, 187(3/4), 358–370. https://doi:10.1080/03004430.2016.1205044

Ehri L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4

Share D. L . (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2

Vellutino F. R. Scanlon D. M. (2002). The Interactive Strategies approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00002-4

Gibson E. J. Levin H . (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Venezky R. L . (1999). The American way of spelling: the structure and origins of American English orthography. New York, NY: Guilford.

Tunmer W. E. Chapman J. W. (2012). Does set for variability mediate the influence of vocabulary knowledge on the development of word recognition skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 122–140. https://doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.542527

Rodgers E. D’Agostino J. V. Harmey S. J. Kelly R. H. Brownfield K. (2016). Examining the nature of scaffolding in an early literacy intervention. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.142

Arcidiacono M. B . (2020). Analysis of teacher support of word learning strategies in the ISA-X intervention [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University at Albany.

Anderson K. L. (2009). The effects of professional development on early reading skills: A comparison of two approaches (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT 3365837).

McGee L. M. Kim H. Nelson K. S. Fried M. D. (2015). Change over time in first graders’ strategic use of information at point of difficulty in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 263–291.

Schwartz R. (2019, October 1). The three cueing systems in beginning reading instruction: Good idea or hoax? Reading Recovery Council of North America. https://readingrecovery.org/the-three-cueing-systems-in-beginning-reading-instruction-good-idea-or-hoax/

May H. Sirinides P. Gray A. Goldsworthy H . (2016). Reading recovery: An evaluation of the four-year i3 scale-up. CPRE Research Reports. http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/81

Scanlon D. M. Vellutino F. R. (1996). Prerequisite skills, early instruction and success in first-grade reading: Selected results from a longitudinal study. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 54–63.

Torgesen J. K. Alexander A. W. Wagner R. K. Rashotte C. A. Voeller K. K. S. Conway T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–78.

Wanzek J. Vaughn S. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 126–142.

Price-Mohr R. Price C. (2017). Gender differences in early reading strategies: A comparison of synthetic phonics only with a mixed approach to teaching reading to 4-5 year-old children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(5), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0813-y

Bryk A. S. (2015). 2014 AERA distinguished lecture: Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(December), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15621543

Miciak J. Fletcher J. M. (2020). The critical role of instructional response for identifying dyslexia and other learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 343–353. https://doi:10.1177/0022219420906801

Phillips G. Smith P. (1997). A third chance to learn: The development and evaluation of specialized interventions for young children experiencing difficulty with learning to read (No. 13227). Wellington, New Zealand: National Council for Educational Research.

Dweck C. S . (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Holmqvist M. (2020). Medical diagnosis of dyslexia in a Swedish elite school: A case of “consecrating medicalization”. British Journal of Sociology, 71(2), 366–381. https://doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12737

Hale C. (2015). Legendary LD: Learning disabilities, creativity, and social class. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1). https://doi:10.18061/dsq.v35i1.3806

Vellutino F. R . (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Solari E. J. Patton Terry N. Gaab N. Hogan T. P. Nelson N. J. Pentimonti J. M. Petscher Y. Sayko S. (2020). Translational science: A road map for the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S347–S360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.357

May H. Sirinides P. Gray A. Goldsworthy H . (2016). Reading Recovery: An evaluation of the four-year i3 scale-up. CPRE Research Reports http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/81.

Scanlon D. M. Gelzheiser L. M. Vellutino F. R. Schatschneider C. Sweeney J. M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers versus direct interventions for children. Learning & Individual Differences, 18(3), 346–359. https://doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.002

Vellutino F. R. Scanlon D. M. Sipay E. R. Small S. G. Pratt A. Chen R. Denckla M. B . (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601.

Gabriel R. E. (2020). Converting to privatization: A discourse analysis of dyslexia policy narratives. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219861945

Willingham D. (2008). When and how neuroscience applies to education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(6), 421–423.

Fletcher J. M. Grigorenko E. L. (2017). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: The past and the future. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(9/10), 930–940. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717001084

Gamse B. C. Jacob R. T. Horst M. Boulay B. Unlu F. (2008). Reading first impact study final report (NCEE 2009-4038). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Konstantopoulos S. Sun M. (2012). Is the persistence of teacher effects in early grades larger for lower-performing students? American Journal of Education, 118, 309–339. https://doi.org/10.1086/664772

Nye B. Konstantopolous S. Hedges L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257. https://doi:10.3102/01623737026003237

Tivnan T. Hemphill L. (2005). Comparing four literacy reform models in high-poverty schools: Patterns of first-grade achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 105(5), 419–441. https://doi:10.1086/431885

Zirkel P. A. (2020). Legal developments for students with dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(3), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720931538