This article explores the possible relationships between geography, literacy, pedagogy, and poverty. It characterizes poverty as a wicked problem, which sees economic inequality escalating in a number of neoliberal democracies. Key insights from theorists of economic inequality are summarized. The enduring nature of poverty in particular places is noted, and the associated risks of “fickle literacies” are considered. A case study of one child growing up and attending school in a location with intergenerational unemployment is discussed as an example of the risks associated with literacy policy and pedagogy in an era of global educational reform. Drawing on the work of Foucault and Massey, it is argued that despite the discourses of standardization, teachers can continue to educate culturally diverse young people in ways that help them to negotiate and imagine positive and productive ways of learning together. The possibilities for working against deficit views of people in poverty are explored through three classroom examples of place-conscious pedagogies which position young people as critically literate cosmopolitan citizens. The article concludes by advocating the need for translocal research alliances to work explicitly for social justice through place-conscious pedagogies and critical literacy education.
Australian Council of Social Services. (2015). Inequality in Australia 2015. Strawberry Hills, Australia: Author.
2.
BrandtD. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BurnettC.MerchantG. (2016). Boxes of poison: Baroque technique as antidote to simple views of literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 258–279.
4.
ClarkM. M. (2014). Learning to be literate: Insights from research for policy and practice. Birmingham, England: Glendale Education.
5.
CollinsD.ColemanT. (2008). Social geographies of education: Looking within, and beyond, school boundaries. Geography Compass, 2, 281–299. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00081.x
6.
ComberB. (2016a). Literacy, place and pedagogies of possibility. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
ComberB. (2016b). Poverty, place and pedagogy in education: Research stories from front-line workers. Australian Educational Researcher, 43, 393–417. doi:10.1007/s13384-016-0212-9
8.
ComberB.KerkhamL. (2016). Gus: I cannot write anything. In DysonA. H. (Ed.), Child cultures, schooling and literacy: Global perspectives on children composing their lives (pp. 53–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
ComberB.ThomsonP.WellsM. (2001). Critical literacy finds a “place”: Writing and social action in a neighborhood school. Elementary School Journal, 101, 451–464.
10.
ComberB.WoodsA. (2016). Literacy teacher research in high poverty schools: Why it matters. In LampertJ.BurnettB. (Eds.), Teacher education for high poverty schools (pp. 193–210). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
ComberB.WoodsA.GrantH. (2017). Literacy and imagination: Finding space in a crowded curriculum. The Reading Teacher.
12.
Compton-LillyC. (2011). Literacy and schooling in one family across time. Research in the Teaching of English, 45, 224–251.
13.
DorlingD. (2014). Inequality and the 1%. London, England: Verso.
14.
DorlingD. (2016). A better politics: How government can make us happier. London, England: Publishing Partnership.
15.
ForbesJ.SimeD. (2016). Relations between child poverty and new migrant child status, academic attainment and social participation: Insights using social capital theory. Education Sciences, 6, 24–38. doi:10.3390/educsci6030024
16.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
17.
FoucaultM. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault (R. Martin, Interviewer). In MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A seminar with Michael Foucault (pp. 9–15). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
18.
GriffithA.SmithD. (2014). Under new public management: Institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
19.
GruenewaldD. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–12.
20.
GutiérrezK. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the Third Space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.
21.
HabermanM. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290–294.
22.
HayesD.HattamR.ComberB.KerkhamL.LuptonR.ThomsonP. (2017). Literacy, leading and learning: Beyond pedagogies of poverty. London, England: Routledge.
23.
HullG.StornaiuoloA. (2014). Cosmopolitan literacies, social networks, and “proper distance”: Striving to understand in a global world. Curriculum Inquiry, 44, 15–44.
24.
JanksH. (2010). Literacy and power. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
JanksH.ComberB. (2006). Critical literacy across continents. In PahlK.RowsellJ. (Eds.), Travel notes from the New Literacy Studies: Instances of practice (pp. 95–117). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
26.
JonesS.Johnson ThielJ.DávilaD.PittardE.WoglomJ. F.ZhouX.…SnowM. (2016). Childhood geographies and spatial justice: Making sense of place and space-making as political acts in education. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1126–1158. doi:10.3102/0002831216655221
27.
KostogrizA.TsolidisG. (2008). Transcultural literacy: Between the global and the local. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16, 125–136.
28.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, England: Routledge.
29.
LawsonH. (2016). Categories, boundaries, and bridges: The social geography of schooling and the need for new institutional designs. Education Sciences, 6, 32–45. doi:10.3390/educsci6030032
30.
LeanderK. M.SheehyM. (Eds.). (2004) Spatializing literacy research and practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
31.
LefebvreH. (1974). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., trans.). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
32.
LukeA. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48.
33.
LukeA.ComberB.GrantH. (2003). Critical literacies and cultural studies. In BullG.AnsteyM. (Eds.), The literacy lexicon (2nd ed., pp. 15–36). Melbourne, Australia: Prentice Hall.
34.
MarshJ. (2016). Gareth: The reluctant writer. In DysonA. H. (Ed.), Child cultures, schooling and literacy: Global perspectives on children composing their lives (pp. 53–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. London, England: Sage.
36.
NixonH.ComberB.GrantH.WellsM. (2012). Collaborative inquiries into literacy, place and identity in changing policy contexts: Implications for teacher development. In DayC. (Ed.), International handbook on teacher and school development (pp. 175–184). London, England: Routledge.
37.
NuthallG. (2007). The hidden lives of learners. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research Press.
38.
OakleyD.FraserJ. (2016). U.S. public-housing transformations and the housing publics lost in transition. City & Community, 15, 349–366.
39.
PayneR. (2012). A framework for understanding poverty workbook: 10 actions to educate students. Highlands, TX: Aha Process.
40.
Pe SymacoL. (2016). Geographies of social exclusion: Education access in the Philippines. In Pe SymacoL.BrockC. (Eds.), Space, place and scale in the study of education (pp. 93–106). London, England: Routledge.
41.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (GoldhammerA., trans.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
42.
RappaportJ. (2000). Community narratives: Tales of terror and joy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 1–24.
43.
RobertsonS. (2016). Piketty, capital and education: A solution to, or problem in, rising social inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37, 823–835.
44.
RogersR.WetzelM. M. (2013). Studying agency in literacy teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse analysis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10, 62–92.
45.
RoyA. (2014). Capitalism: A ghost story. London, England: Verso.
46.
SmithD. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
47.
WorthamS. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
VinsonT.RawsthorneM.BeavisA.EricsonM. (2015). Dropping off the edge, 2015: Persistent communal disadvantage. Victoria, Australia: Jesuit Social Services/Catholic Social Services Australia. Retrieved fromhttps://dote.org.au
