Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using data from a 4-year longitudinal ethnography in a multiage classroom, this study followed one “struggling” reader/writer from his first day of kindergarten into first grade in order to explore how time shapes young children’s beliefs about reading and writing as well as constructions of literate identities. Using mediated discourse analysis (MDA) and timescale analysis to unpack the social interactions in this rich case, I consider the social construction of temporality in this classroom and, more specifically, the juxtaposition of diverse productions of time across sites of engagement. Findings suggest that the spatiotemporal matrix grounding classroom literacy interactions is neither static nor predetermined; it is produced within intersecting discourses, historical bodies, and artifacts that children and adults draw on during a moment of interaction. Significantly, rethinking the spatiotemporal matrix in schools offers possibilities for reclaiming the “struggling” child’s literate identities.

Keywords

apprenticeship development identity intervention literacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam

(1995). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Brandt

(1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of readers, writers, and texts. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Brown

Renshaw

(2006). Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 247–259.

Burgess

(2010). Doing time: An exploration of timescapes in literacy learning and research. Language and Education, 24, 353–365.

Burgess

Ivanič

(2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27, 228–255.

Compton-Lilly

(2011). Literacy and schooling in one family across time. Research in the Teaching of English, 45, 224–251.

Compton-Lilly

(2013a). Temporal discourse analysis. In Albers

M. M.

(Ed.), New methods in literacy research (pp. 40–55). New York, NY: Routledge.

Compton-Lilly

(2013b). Temporality, trajectory, and early literacy learning. In Hall

Cremin

Comber

Moll

(Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning, and culture (pp. 83–95). Oxford, Engalnd: Wiley-Blackwell.

Compton-Lilly

Halverson

(Eds.). (2014). Time and space in literacy research. New York, NY: Routledge.

10.

Dyson

A. H.

(2013). The case of the missing childhoods methodological notes for composing children in writing studies. Written Communication, 30, 399–427.

11.

Falchi

Siegel

(2014). Write on time! The role of timescales in defining and disciplining young writers. In Compton-Lilly

Halverson

(Eds.), Time and space in literacy research (pp. 79–92). New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

Ivanič

(2005). The discoursal construction of writer identity. In Beach

Green

Kamil

Shanahan

(Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 391–416). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

13.

James

Jenks

Prout

(1998). Theorizing childhood. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

14.

James

Prout

(Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London, England: Psychology Press.

15.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Lee

(2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Oxford, England: McGraw-Hill International.

17.

Lemke

(2000). Across the scales of time. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7, 273–290.

18.

Lemke

(2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In Kramsch

(Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 68–87). London, England: Continuum.

19.

Middleton

(1987). Collective memory and remembering: Some issues and approaches. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laborato1y Comparative Human Cognition, 9, 2–5.

20.

Paradise

Rogoff

(2009). Side by side: Learning by observing and pitching in. Ethos, 37, 102–138.

21.

Qvortrup

(1991). Childhood as a special phenomenon: An introduction to a series of national reports. Vienna, Austria: European Centre.

22.

Renshaw

Brown

(1997). Learning partnerships: The role of teachers in a community of learners. In Logan

Sachs

(Eds.), Meeting the challenges of primary schools (pp. 200–211). London, England: Routledge.

23.

Roth

W. M.

Lee

Y. J.

(2006). Contradictions in theorizing and implementing communities in education. Educational Research Review, 1, 27–40.

24.

Scollon

(2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London, England: Routledge.

25.

Scollon

S. W.

(2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London, England: Routledge.

26.

Scribner

Cole

(1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

27.

Wohlwend

K. E.

(2009). Dilemmas and discourses of learning to write: Assessment as a contested site. Language Arts, 86, 341–351.

28.

Wortham

(2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 228–246.

Dangling Literate Identities in Imagined Futures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References