The role of motivation in engaging students in reading activities and thus improving their reading achievement has been widely reported for the past decades. However, despite the increasing numbers of English learners (ELs) in the United States, little is known about how teachers perceive their motivation to read. Focus group methodology was used in this study to explore English as a second language teachers’ perceptions of ELs’ reading motivation. Three major themes that emerged from our qualitative analysis were (a) accessible texts, (b) self-concept, and (c) fitting in. The implications for both future research and classroom instruction are provided.
AllingtonR. (2013). What really matters for struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 66, 520–530.
2.
AllingtonR. L.GabrielR. E. (2012). Every child, every day. Educational Leadership, 69, 10–15.
3.
ArzubiagaA.RuedaR.MonzoL. (2002). Family matters related to the reading engagement of Latina/o children (CIERA Report 1-015). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
4.
BakerL.WigfieldA. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–475.
5.
CalderheadJ. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In BerlinerD. C.CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
6.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.
7.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E.ProchnowJ. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 703–708.
8.
ClarkC. M.PetersonP. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
9.
CoddingtonC. S.GuthrieJ. T. (2009). Teacher and student perceptions of boys’ and girls’ reading motivation. Reading Psychology, 30, 225–249.
10.
ConradiK.JangB. G.McKennaM. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 127–164.
11.
EchevarriaJ.VogtM. E.ShortD. J. (2014). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
12.
EdmundsH. (1999). The focus group research handbook. Chicago, IL: NTC Business Books.
13.
GambrellL. B. (1996). Creating classroom cultures that foster reading motivation. The Reading Teacher, 48, 662–673.
14.
GambrellL. B. (2009). Creating opportunities to read more so that students read better. In HiebertE. (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 251–266). New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
GambrellL. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65, 172–178. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01024
16.
GambrellL. B.PalmerB. M.CodlingR. M.MazzoniS. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49, 518–533.
17.
GardnerR. C.LambertW. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
18.
GottliebM. (2016). Assessing English language learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
19.
GuthrieJ. T.KlaudaS. L. (2012). Making textbook reading meaningful. Educational Leadership, 69, 64–68.
20.
GuthrieJ. T.WigfieldA. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrD. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
IveyG.JohnstonP. H. (2013). Engagement with young adult literature: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 255–175. doi:10.1002/rrq.46
22.
KatzirT.LesauxN. K.KimY. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261–276.
23.
KlaudaS. L. (2009). The role of parents in adolescents’ reading motivation and activity. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 325–363. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9112-0
24.
LiamputtongP. (2011). Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
LoeraG.RuedaR.NakamotoJ. (2011). The association between parental involvement in reading and schooling and children’s reading engagement in Latino families. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 133–155. doi:10.1080/19388071003731554
26.
MalloyJ. A.MarinakB. A.GambrellL. B.MazzoniS. A. (2013). Assessing motivation to read: The motivation to read profile—Revised. The Reading Teacher, 67, 273–282.
27.
McKennaM. C.ConradiK.LawrenceC.JangB. G.MeyerJ. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a US survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 283–306.
28.
MorganP. L.FuchsD. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation?Exceptional Children, 73, 165–183.
29.
MucherahW.YoderA. (2008). Motivation for reading and middle school students’ performance on standardized testing in reading. Reading Psychology, 29, 214–235. doi:10.1080/02702710801982159
30.
NeisserU. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In PickA. D. (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
NeugebauerS. R. (2013). A daily diary study of reading motivation inside and outside of school: A dynamic approach to motivation to read. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 152–159.
32.
O’FlahavanJ.GambrellL. B.GuthrieJ.StahlS.BaumannJ.AlvermannD. (1992). Poll results guide activities of research center. Reading Today, 10, 12.
33.
Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ. E. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behaviors in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 478–491.
34.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–333.
35.
ProtacioM. S. (2012). Reading motivation: A focus on English learners. The Reading Teacher, 66, 69–77. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01092
36.
ProtacioM. S. (2013). Investigating the reading engagement of English Language Learners: A case study of four middle school ELLs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). East Lansing: Michigan State University.
37.
QuirkM.UnrauN.RagusaG.RuedaR.LimH.VelascoA.…LoeraG. (2010). Teacher beliefs about reading motivation and their enactment in classrooms: The development of a survey questionnaire. Reading Psychology, 31, 93–120. doi:10.1080/002702710902754051
38.
SaldanaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
SchiefeleU. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257–279.
40.
SchiefeleU.SchaffnerE.MollerJ.WigfieldA. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463. doi:10.1002/RRQ.030
41.
StipekD. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
42.
SturtevantE. G.KimG. S. (2010). Literacy motivation and school/non-school literacies among students enrolled in a middle-school ESOL program. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 68–85. doi:10.1080/19388070802716907
43.
SweetA. P. (1997). Teacher perceptions of student motivation and their relation to literacy learning. In GuthrieJ. T.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 86–101). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
44.
SweetA. P.GuthrieJ. T.NgM. M. (1998). Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210–223.
45.
TaboadaA.BuehlM. M. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions of reading comprehension and motivation to read. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 101–122. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.622559
46.
TaboadaA.McElvanyN. (2009). Between the skill and will of extensive reading: L2 learners as engaged readers. In CirockiA. (Ed.), Extensive reading in English language teaching (pp. 179–202). Warsaw, Poland: Polish Scientific Publishers.
47.
UnrauN.RagusaG.BowersE. (2015). Teachers focus on motivation for reading: “It’s all about knowing the relationship.”Reading Psychology, 36, 105–144. doi:10.1080/02702711.2013.836582
48.
UnrauN.SchlackmanJ. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101.
49.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.
50.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T.PerencevichK. C.TaboadaA.KlaudaS. L.McRaeA.BarbosaP. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating the effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 432–445.
