This article invites a conversation about how critical participatory research transforms the production of knowledge, enables a complex chronicling of counter stories, and nurtures the contestation of dominant narratives with the very people who have been misrepresented as Others. Through a series of research stories fomented in prison, courtrooms, and social movements, I hope to incite a provocative imagination for critical research “to be of use” in a moment of neoliberal gentrification of educational studies.
AhmedS. (2014). Willful subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
AndersonJ. (2014, April). A long shadow. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association Annual Lecture.
3.
AndersonS. (2016). (Dis)entangling gender and sexuality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY.
4.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.
5.
AppaduraiA. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4, 167–177. doi:10.1080/14767720600750696
6.
ArendtH. (1973). Origins of totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Jovanovich. (Originally published on 1951)
7.
BrodkinK. (1998). How Jews became White folks and what that says about race in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
ChmielewskiJ.BelmonteK.StoudtB.FineM. (2016). Intersectional inque(e)ries: Participatory research on discipline disparities at the race/sexuality/gender nexus. In SkibaR.MedirattaK.RauschK. (Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities. London, England: Palgrave.
9.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
10.
DiamondL. (2009). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
11.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1903). The souls of black folks. Chicago, IL: McClurg.
12.
FabricantM.FineM. (2012). Charter schools and the corporate makeover of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College.
13.
FineM. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing the self and other in qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70–82). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
FineM. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance. A textbook for critical research methods. Social Justice Research, 19, 83–108.
15.
FineM.GreeneA. C.SanchezS. (in press). Neoliberal blues and prec(ar)ious knowledge. Urban Review.
FineM.TorreM. E.BoudinK.BowenI.ClarkJ.HyltonD.…UpeguiD. (2003b). Participatory action research: Within and beyond bars. In CamicP.RhodesJ. E.YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 173–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
19.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. New York, NY: Touchstone.
20.
GreeneB. (2008). African American lesbians and gay men. In NevilleH. (Ed.), The psychology of African Americans: A handbook (pp. 311–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
IrvineA. (2010). “We’ve had three of them”: Addressing the invisibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual and gender non-conforming youth in the juvenile justice system. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 19, 675–701.
22.
KleinN. (2008). Shock doctrine. New York, NY: Picador.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
Martin-BaroI. (1996). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
26.
MayoC. (1982). Training for positive marginality. In BickmanL. (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (pp. 57–73). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
PrattM. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33–40.
28.
PiercyM. (1982) To be of use. New York, NY: Doubleday.
29.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 55–169.
30.
RogersJ.MirraN. (2014) It’s about time. Learning time and educational opportunity in California high schools. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles’ Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. Retrieved fromhttp://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/projects/its-about-time
31.
RussellS.ToomeyR. B.RyanC.DiazR. (2014). Being out at school: The implications for school victimization and young adult adjustment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 635–643.
32.
Savin-WilliamsR. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
33.
TateC. C.PearsonM. D. (2016). Toward an inclusive model of lesbian identity development: Outlining a common and nuanced model for cis and trans women. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 20, 97–115.
34.
TeoT. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical-hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory and Psychology, 18, 47–67.
WeisL.FineM. (2012). Critical bifocality and circuits of privilege: Expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 173–201.
