Multimedia expands the opportunity for graduate teachers to develop a community of learners in an online reading clinic as they reflect and collaborate on a variety of reading and writing experiences during an online lesson study of a comprehensive corrective reading lesson. This qualitative method study explores (a) the pedagogical shifts of teachers in an online reading clinic lesson study of their own self-selected literacy teaching. The findings reveal that the pedagogical shifts made by graduate teachers in an online lesson study resulted in changes in 1) knowledge of assessment and diagnosis as evident in metacognitive reflection and progressive of understandings; 2) teachers instructional differentiation and intervention skills refined by examination of practice as evident in their analytical reasoning; and 3) increased commitment to providing corrective reading instruction based on formal and informal data—driven decisions.
AghaeiS.NematbakhshM. A.FarsaniH. K. (2012). Evolution of the World Wide Web: From Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Web and Semantic Technology, 3, 1–10. doi:10.5121/ijwest.2012.3101
AndersonG. L.HerrK. (2011). Scaling up “evidence-based” practices for teachers is a profitable but discredited paradigm. Educational Researcher, 40, 287–289. doi:10.3102/0013189x11417619
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech games and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BeachR. (2012). Research and policy: Can online learning communities foster professional development?Language Arts, 89, 256–262.
6.
BlitzC. L. (2013). Can online learning communities achieve the goals of transitional professional learning communities? What the literature says (REL 2013-003). Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved fromhttp://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
7.
BroadleyT. (2010). Digital revolution or digital divide: Will rural teachers get a piece of the professional development pie?Education in Rural Australia, 20, 63–76.
8.
CadyJ.ReardenK. (2009). Delivering online professional development in mathematics to rural educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 281–298.
9.
ChesbroP.BoxlerN. (2010). Weaving the fabric of professional development in the 21st century using technology. Journal of Staff Development, 31, 48–53.
10.
ChristT.AryaP.Ming ChiuM. (2012). Collaborative peer video analysis: Insights about literacy assessment and instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 171–199. doi:10.1177/1086296x12440429
11.
ClarkeL. W.Watts-TaffeS. (2013). Educating literacy teachers online: Tools, techniques, and transformations. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
CloonanA. (2008). Multimodality pedagogies: A multiliteracies approach. The International Journal of Learning, 15, 159–168.
13.
CoiroJ.KnobelM.LankshearC.LeuD. J. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In CoiroJ.KnobelM.LankshearC.LeuD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
ColeM.WertschJ. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39, 250–256. doi:10.1159/000278475
15.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Darling-HammondL.HammernessK.GrossmanP.RustF.ShulmanL. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In Darling-HammondL.BranfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
DuFourR. (2004). What is a professional learning community?Educational Leadership, 61, 6–11.
18.
DuFourR.EakerR.DuFourR. (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
19.
Duncan-HowellJ. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 324–340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953
Fahser-HerroD.SteinkuehlerC. (2009). Web 2.0 literacy and secondary teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26, 55–62.
22.
GeeJ. P. (2012). Social linguistics, and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
GruebaumE. A. (2010). Creating online professional learning communities: And how to translate practices to the virtual classroom. eLearn Magazine. Retrieved fromhttp://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1806336
24.
KalantzisM.CopeB.CloonanA. (2010). A multiliteracies perspective on the new literacies. In BakerA. E. (Ed.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 61–87). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
25.
KozulinA. (Ed.). (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
LankshearC.KnobelM. (2007). Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In KnobelM.LankshearC. (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
27.
LiebermanJ. (2009). Reinventing teacher professional norms and identities: The role of lesson study and learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 35, 83–99. doi:10.1080/13674580802264688
28.
LitowitzB. E. (1993). Deconstruction in the zone of proximal development. In FormanE. A.MinickN.StoneC. A. (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 184–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
MackeyJ.EvansT. (2011). Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 1–18.
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). London, England: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203804889
32.
OhlerJ. (2009). Orchestrating the media collage. In SchererM. (Ed.), Challenging the whole child: Reflections on best practices in learning, teaching, and leadership (p. 161). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
ParisS.WinogradP. (2010). The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation (Commissioned Paper for the U.S. Department of Education). Retrieved fromhttp://www.ciera.org/library/archive/2001-04/0104parwin.htm
35.
ReadingC. (2010). Using ICT to increase professional connectedness for teachers in remote Australia. Australian Educational Computing, 25, 3–6.
UkpokoduO. N. (2010). Bracing to teach online in teacher education. In MukerjiS.TripathiP. (Eds.), Cases on transnational learning and technologically enabled environments (pp. 245–265). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-749-7
