Germany has twice decided to abandon nuclear energy. The first time, it set somewhat dynamic shutdown dates for plants before changing course. The second time, it set fixed shutdown dates. Game theory holds that awareness of shutdown dates may lead to endgame behavior, in which people at all levels of the industry behave more self-interestedly, thus potentially jeopardizing public safety, as the end dates approach. We examine whether such behavior is occurring in Germany by drawing on three sources of evidence: the public record, the frequencies of reportable safety-related events, and experimental data. The findings are inconclusive but suggest that the concerns merit consideration by policymakers in Germany or wherever policies need to be designed for the phaseout of dying industries. Counterintuitively, a policy designed to increase public safety may inadvertently create novel risks if it does not attend closely enough to the behavioral factors involved in its implementation.
von NeumannJ., & MorgensternO. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
FudenbergD., & TiroleJ. (1991). Game theory.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
5.
AumanR. J., & MaschlerR. (1995) Repeated games with incomplete information.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
6.
SeltenR., & StoeckerR. (1986) End behaviour in sequences of finite prisoner's dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 7, 47–70. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(86)90021-1
7.
RothA. E., & MurnighanJ. K. (1978) Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 17, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(78)90030-5
8.
AndreoniJ. (1988). Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6
9.
FehrE., & GächterS. (2002, January 10). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140. doi:10.1038/415137a
10.
RasmussenJ. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: A modeling problem. Safety Science, 27, 183–213. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00052-0
11.
LevesonN. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systemsSafety Science, 42, 237–270. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00047-x
12.
LevesonN. (2011). Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events. Safety Science, 49, 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.021
Reactor Safety Commission. (2012, July 12). Drohende Gefährdung der kerntechnischen Sicherheit durch Know-How- und Motivationsverlust [Potential threats to nuclear safety through loss of know-how and motivation; memorandum]. Retrieved from http://www.rskonline.de/sites/default/files/reports/epanlagersk449hp.pdf
21.
Reactor Safety Commission. (2016, November 3). Monitoring von Know-how- und Motivationsverlust und geeignete Maßnahmen zur Stärkung von Motivation und Know-how-Erhalt in der deutschen Kernenergiebranche [Monitoring of loss of know-how and motivation and suitable measures for strengthening motivation and preserving know-how in German nuclear power industries; statement] Retrieved from http://www.rskonline.de/sites/default/files/reports/epanlage1rsk488hp_0.pdf
ProbstT. M., & BrubakerT. L. (2001). The effects of job insecurity on employee safety outcomes: Cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 139–159. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.2.139
28.
ProbstT. M. (2004). Safety and insecurity: Exploring the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 3–10. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.3
29.
SuttonR. I. (1987). The process of organizational death: Disbanding and reconnecting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 542–569. doi:10.2307/2392883
30.
WeickK., & SutcliffeK. (2001) Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
International Nuclear Advisory Group (1991). Safety culture (Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-4). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency
Wiwen-NilssonT. (2006). Phasing-out of nuclear power in Sweden. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 24, 355–361. doi:10.1080/02646811.2006.11433441
35.
HanssonM., & WigbladR. (2006) Pyrrhic victories–Anticipating the closedown effect. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 938–958. doi:10.1080/09585190600641255
36.
CarrollJ. S. (1998). Organizational learning activities in high-hazard industries: The logics underlying self-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 699–717. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00116
37.
PlottC. R., & SmithV. L. (2008) Handbook of experimental economics results (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
38.
BinmoreK., & KlempererP. (2002) The biggest auction ever: The sale of the British 3G telecom licenses. The Economic Journal, 112(478), C74–C96. doi:10.1111/1468-029700020
39.
SlovicP. (1987, April 17). Perceptionof risk. Science, 236, 280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
FolgerR. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In MurnighanJ. K. (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 161–183). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2003). Managing the early termination of operation of nuclear power plants (Safety Reports Series No. 31). Vienna, Austria: Author.
