Technological innovation is a double-edged sword. It can help solve major problems, such as how to treat cancer, and can be an engine of economic growth, but it can also cost jobs, such as when automation replaces people Both aspects raise issues that have major but so far little-recognized policy implications. One such issue is that new technologies are now taking the place not just of routinized jobs but of more complex positions. Another is that many government policies meant to foster needed innovation are based on an outmoded understanding of how innovation occurs and thus are not as effective as they could be. As behavioral scientists who study technology and innovation, we offer insights into addressing both issues.
References
1.
FaunceW. A. (1965). Automation and the division of labor. Social Problems, 13, 147–160.
2.
BarleyS. R. (2017). What is a technological revolution? [Working paper]. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara, Technology Management Program.
3.
BrynjolfssonE., & McAfeeA. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Cambridge, MA: Author.
4.
BrynjolfssonE., & McAfeeA. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: Norton.
OlinskyB., & AyresS. (2013). Training for success: A policy to expand apprenticeships in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
10.
EhrenreichB. (2005). Bait and switch: The (futile) pursuit of the American dream. New York, NY: Holt.
11.
SmithV. (2001). Crossing the great divide: Worker risk and opportunity in the new economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
MitchellT. M. (1997). Machine learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
BishopC. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning.New York, NY: Springer.
14.
SalehB., AbeK., AroraR. S., & ElgammalA. (2014). Toward automated discovery of artistic influence. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.3218.pdf
LehmanC. D., WellmanR. D., BuistD. M., KerlikowskeK., TostesonA. N. A., & MigliorettiD. L. (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 1828–1837
17.
HorowitzS. (2015, September 7). Help for the way we work now. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
18.
U. S. Government Accountability Office (2015, April). Contingent workforce: Size, characteristics, earnings, and benefits (GAO-15-168R). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/669899.pdf
19.
BergerS. (with the MIT Taskforce on Production in the Innovation Economy) (2013). Making in America: From innovation to market. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
20.
NelsonR. N. (1982). Government and technical progress: A cross-industry analysis.New York, NY: Pergamon Press
21.
RosenbergN. (1983). Inside the black box: Technology and economics Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press.
22.
ThirtleC. G., & RuttanV. W. (1986) The role of demand and supply in the generation and diffusion of technical change (Bulletin No. 86–5). Minneapolis University of Minnesota Economic Development Center
23.
DoughertyD. (2016). Taking advantage of emergence: Productively innovating in complex innovation systems. Oxford, United Kingdom Oxford University Press.
24.
Van de VenA. H., & GarudR. (1993) Innovation and industry development The case of cochlear implants. In BurgelmanR. & R. Rosenbloom (Eds.), Research on technological innovation, management, and policy (Vol. 5, pp. 1–46). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25.
UsherA. P. (1954). A history of mechanical invention. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
26.
ConstantE. W. (1980). The origins of the turbojet revolution.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
FreemanC. (1986). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
28.
DosiG. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120–1171
29.
RehnquistJ. (2003). FDA's review process for new drug applications: A management review (OEI-01-01-00590). Retrieved from Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, website https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-01-00590.pdf
30.
ZuckerL., DarbyM., & BrewerM. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.
31.
BushV. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. A report to the president.Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
32.
UtterbackJ. M. (1974, February 15) Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183, 620–626
33.
PelzD. C. (1985). Innovation complexity and the sequence of innovating stages. Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization, 6, 261–291.
Van de VenA. H., PolleyD. E., GarudR., & VenkataramanS. (1999). The innovation journey.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
HargadonA. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Boston, MA Harvard Business School Press.
37.
FountainJ. E. (1998). Social capital Its relationship to innovation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy 25, 103–115.
38.
FountainJ. E., & AtkinsonR. D. (1998) Innovation, social capital, and the new economy: New federal policies to support collaborative researchWashington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
39.
ArthurW. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves.New York, NY: Free Press
40.
GarudR., TuertscherP., & Van de VenA. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 775–819.
41.
BesenS. M., & SalonerG. (1989). The economics of telecommunications standards. In CrandallR. W. & FlammK. (Eds.), Changing the rules: Technological change, international competition, and regulation in communication (pp. 177–220). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
TushmanM., & RosenkopfL. (1992). Organizational determinants of technological evolution: Towards a sociology of technological evolution. In CummingsL. L. & StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 311–347). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
43.
GarudR., & RappaM. (1995). On the persistence of researchers in technology development. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4, 527–550.
44.
TaylorJ. R., & Van EveryE. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
National Science Foundation. (2015). Big data regional innovation hubs (BD hubs): Accelerating the big data innovation ecosystem (Program Solicitation NSF 15–562). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15562/nsf15562.htm
47.
Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program. (2016). The Federal Big Data Research and Development Strategic Plan. Retrieved from https://www.nitrd.gov/PUBS/bigdatardstrategicplan.pdf
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. (2010, October 28). A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature, 467, 1061–1073. doi:10.1038/nature09534
51.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. (2012, November 1). An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature, 491, 56–65. doi:10.1038/nature11632
