Organizations increasingly expect students to be prepared for an artificial intelligence (AI)–enabled workplace. To address this, we describe a structured approach for students to use AI to enhance and elevate data synthesis and analysis of qualitative interviews in any course. The exercise has four steps: (a) co-develop interview questions; (b) conduct interviews using audio recording and AI to transcribe; (c) leverage AI to synthesize the large quantity of interview material; and (d) critically analyze and discuss the synthesized material for improved performance. AI synthesis and analysis can be implemented using a scaffolded approach across multiple class sessions or in one class. We provide AI prompts and sample results as well as variations for implementation. The exercise is followed by a debrief with questions provided. Preparing for the future workplace requires students to develop AI skills, particularly data synthesis and analysis.
BawdenD.RobinsonL. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781
2.
BurmeisterA.AltermanV.FasbenderU.WangM. (2022). Too much to know? The cognitive demands of daily knowledge seeking and the buffering role of coworker contact quality. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(8), 1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000925
3.
Dell’AcquaF.McFowlandE.IIIMollickE. R.Lifshitz-AssafH.KelloggK.RajendranS.KrayerL.CandelonF.LakhaniK. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality [Harvard Business School Tech. & Oper. Mgt. Working Paper. The Wharton School Research Paper]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321
4.
GerlichM. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
5.
JiaN.LuoX.FangZ.LiaoC. (2024). When and how artificial intelligence augments employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 67(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0426
KasneciE.SeßlerK.KüchemannS.BannertM.DementievaD.FischerF.. . .KasneciG. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
8.
KillianL. J.Monje-CuetoF.HuberM. M.BrandonC. (2021). The ethics interview: Can a single interview exercise help students experience the benefits of professional engagement?Issues in Accounting Education, 37(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-2020-049
9.
LiuW.WangY. (2024). The effects of using AI tools on critical thinking in English literature classes among EFL learners: An intervention study. European Journal of Education, 59(4), Article e12804. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12804
10.
MollickE. R.MollickL. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts [The Wharton School Research Paper]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4475995
11.
MulvaneyM. K. (2003). The information interview: Bridging college and beyond. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(3), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569903066003
12.
ShahS. S.AsadM. M. (2024). Impact of critical thinking approach on learners’ dependence on innovative transformation through artificial intelligence. In The evolution of artificial intelligence in higher education: Challenges, risks, and ethical considerations (pp. 161–182). Emerald Publishing Limited.
13.
ShaoY.HuangC.SongY.WangM.SongY. H.ShaoR. (2024). Using augmentation-based AI tool at work: A daily investigation of learning-based benefit and challenge. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241266503
SwellerJ. (2023). The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2
TellerE. (2017). Teaching the importance of networking by conducting informational interviews. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 18, 417–437.
18.
Van de PolJ.VolmanM.BeishuizenJ. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296.
19.
Van MerrienboerJ. J.SwellerJ. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
