This experiential exercise enhances students’ understanding of the circular economy, sustainable packaging practices, and greenwashing. By critically examining common packaging materials and assessing their environmental trade-offs, students develop a deeper appreciation for the complexities of sustainable decision-making within organizations. The exercise addresses the pressing issue of packaging waste and the deceptive practice of greenwashing. Through collaborative analysis, students identify opportunities to reduce waste, promote circularity, and avoid misleading sustainability claims. The article outlines the exercise’s objectives, logistics, and discussion points, highlighting its potential to foster critical thinking, collaboration, and a more sustainable mindset among future business professionals. This in-person exercise is suitable for undergraduate and graduate students in a number of courses such as entrepreneurship, management, marketing, strategy, supply chain, ethics, and environmental business.
AliW.AliH.SouissiS.ZinckP. (2023). Are bioplastics an ecofriendly alternative to fossil fuel plastics?Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(4), 1991–2002.
2.
AzziA.BattiniD.PersonaA.SgarbossaF. (2012). Packaging design: General framework and research agenda. Packaging Technology and Science, 25(8), 435–456.
3.
BakkerC. A.MuggeR.BoksC.OguchiM. (2021). Understanding and managing product lifetimes in support of a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, Article 123764.
4.
BraungartM.McDonoughW. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
5.
CoelhoP. M.CoronaB.ten KloosterR.WorrellE. (2020). Sustainability of reusable packaging–Current situation and trends. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6, Article 100037.
6.
CoronaB.ShenL.ReikeD.CarreónJ. R.WorrellE. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, Article 104498.
7.
DantasT. E. T.de-SouzaE. D.DestroI. R.HammesG.RodriguezC. M. T.SoaresS. R. (2021). How the combination of circular economy and industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 213–227.
8.
De la TorreR.OnggoB. S.CorluC. G.NogalM.JuanA. A. (2021). The role of simulation and serious games in teaching concepts on circular economy and sustainable energy. Energies, 14(4), Article 1138.
GeissdoerferM.SavagetP.BockenN. M. P.HultinkE. J. (2017). The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm?Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.
17.
GoelV.LuthraP.KapurG. S.RamakumarS. S. V. (2021). Biodegradable/bio-plastics: Myths and realities. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 29, 3079–3104.
18.
HuangC. C.MaH. W. (2004). A multidimensional environmental evaluation of packaging materials. Science of the Total Environment, 324(1–3), 161–172.
19.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis—Contribution of working group to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
20.
JedlickaW. (2008). Packaging sustainability: Tools, systems and strategies for innovative package design. John Wiley.
21.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
22.
KonietzkoJ.DasA.BockenN. (2023). Towards regenerative business models: A necessary shift?Sustainable Production and Consumption, 38, 372–388.
23.
LisieckiM.BeléT. G.ÜgdülerS.FiorioR.AstrupT. F.De MeesterS.RagaertK. (2024). Mechanical recycling of printed flexible plastic packaging: The role of binders and pigments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 472, Article 134375.
24.
MorrisT. H. (2020). Experiential learning—A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077.
25.
NadererB.OpreeS. J. (2021). Increasing advertising literacy to unveil disinformation in green advertising. Environmental Communication, 15(7), 923–936.
26.
NazarethM.MarquesM. R.LeiteM. C.CastroÍ. B. (2019). Commercial plastics claiming biodegradable status: Is this also accurate for marine environments?Journal of Hazardous Materials, 366, 714–722.
PieroniM. P.McAlooneT. C.PigossoD. C. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198–216.
29.
Prieto-SandovalV.JacaC.OrmazabalM. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605–615.
30.
RhodesC. J. (2018). Plastic pollution and potential solutions. Science Progress, 101(3), 207–260.
31.
SchroederP.AnggraeniK.WeberU. (2019). The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77–95.
32.
SkillingP.HurdF.Lips-WiersmaM.McGheeP. (2023). Navigating hope and despair in sustainability education: A reflexive roadmap for being with eco-anxiety in the classroom. Management Learning, 54(5), 655–679.
33.
SvanesE.VoldM.MøllerH.PettersenM. K.LarsenH.HanssenO. J. (2010). Sustainable packaging design: A holistic methodology for packaging design. Packaging Technology and Science: An International Journal, 23(3), 161–175.
34.
Tiippana-UsvasaloM.PajunenN.MariaH. (2023). The role of education in promoting circular economy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 16(1), 92–103.
35.
TukkerA. (2015). Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76–91.
YangS.ShenJ.HeT.ChenC.WangJ.TangY. (2022). Flotation de-inking for recycling paper: Contrasting the effects of three mineral oil-free offset printing inks on its efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 89283–89294.
41.
ZhuZ.LiuW.YeS.BatistaL. (2022). Packaging design for the circular economy: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 817–832.
