This article discusses how The Inner Circle, an episode of The Office television series, could be used in the classroom to explain leader-member exchange (LMX) theory and in-group/out-group settings in the workplace. LMX is one of the most important theories in the field of leadership. Its focus on the relationship between leader and followers makes it distinct from many other leadership theories. However, undergraduate students without work experience may struggle to see the practical relevance of this theory, finding it abstract. The Inner Circle episode can help instructors illustrate LMX, in-group/out-group settings, and their associated consequences in the workplace. In this article, we share our experience showing this episode in two management classes and provide a breakdown of scenes for instructors interested in using this episode as a supplementary educational tool in their classes.
AntonakisJ.CiancioloA. T.SternbergR. J. (2018). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In AntonakisJ.DayD. V. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 3–26). Sage.
2.
BanasJ. A.DunbarN.RodriguezD.LiuS. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
3.
BauerT. N.ErdoganB. (2015). The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange. Oxford University Press.
4.
BurkeL. A.MooreJ. E. (2003). A perennial dilemma in OB education: Engaging the traditional student. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.9324016
ChampouxJ. E.BillsberryJ. (2012). Using moving images in management education: Technology, formats, delivery, and copyright. In BillsberryJ.CharlesworthJ.LeonardP. (Eds.), Moving images: Effective teaching with film and television in management (pp. 149–158). Information Age.
7.
ClemensJ.WolffM. (1999). Movies to manage by: Lesson in leadership. Contemporary Books.
8.
CogliserC. C.SchriesheimC. A.ScanduraT. A.GardnerW. L. (2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010
9.
DayD.MiscenkoD. (2015). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): Construct evolution, contributions, and future prospects for advancing ledership theory. In BauerT. N.ErdoganB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange (pp. 9–28). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199326174.013.8
10.
DulebohnJ. H.BommerW. H.LidenR. C.BrouerR. L.FerrisG. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
11.
ErdoganB.BauerT. N. (2014). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory: The relational approach to leadership. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 407–433). Oxford University Press.
12.
ErezA.GrantA. M. (2014). Separating data from intuition: Bringing evidence into the management classroom. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0098
13.
FryL.KrigerM. (2009). Towards a theory of being-centered leadership: Multiple levels of being as context for effective leadership. Human Relations, 62(11), 1667–1696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709346380
14.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
15.
GreenR. J. (2003). Teaching psychology through film, video. APS Observer, 16(7), 23–25.
16.
HolbrookR. L. (2009). OB in a video box: Using Remember the Titans as a microcosm for the organizational behavior course. Journal of Management Education, 33(4), 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562908324142
17.
HolbrookR. L.StonerJ. (2022). Revisiting Dead Poets Society as a tool for studying applications of power. Management Teaching Review, 7(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981211002747
18.
HuczynskiA.BuchananD. (2004). Theory from fiction: A narrative process perspective on the pedagogical use of feature film. Journal of Management Education, 28(6), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903262163
19.
HuffmanB. J.KilianC. M. (2011). The flight of the phoenix: Interpersonal aspects of project management. Journal of Management Education, 36(4), 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911423006
20.
JonesG. H. (2014). Humor to the rescue: How to make introductory economics an appealing social science for non-majors. American Journal of Business Education, 7(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v7i2.8474
21.
KauppilaO. P. (2016). When and how does LMX differentiation influence followers’ work outcomes? The interactive roles of one’s own LMX status and organizational context. Personnel Psychology, 69(2), 357–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12110
LidenR. C.ErdoganB.WayneS. J.SparroweR. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409
25.
LidenR. C.MaslynJ. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400105
26.
LidenR. C.SparroweR. T.WayneS. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In FerrisG. R. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 47–119). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
27.
MaL.QuQ. (2010). Differentiation in leader-member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.004
28.
MartinR.GuillaumeY.ThomasG.LeeA.EpitropakiO.WestB. S.GuillaumeY.WestB. S.EpitropakiO. (2016). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
29.
NishiiL. H.MayerD. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412–1426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017190
30.
NorthouseP. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
Smith SockbesonC. E.HartmanL. R.ShawJ. C. (2023). Lessons from The Office: Mismanaged motivation. Management Teaching Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981231163299
34.
SprinkleT. A.UrickM. J. (2016). Alternatives to the movie sandwich habit: Practical approaches to using movies to teach leadership and power. Management Teaching Review, 1(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298115624944
35.
StrattonM. T.KassD. S.RotenberryP. F. (2011). Affective events theater: Creating teaching moments from film and television to explore emotions in the workplace. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 12(2), 1–27.
36.
Sue-ChanC.AuA. K.HackettR. D. (2012). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader/member behavior and leader-member-exchange quality. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.012
WangD.GanC.WuC. (2016). LMX and employee voice: A moderated mediation model of psychological empowerment and role clarity. Personnel Review, 45(3), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2014-0255
40.
WuK. (2010). The dark side of LMX: Variances among out-group members in growth need and work outcomes [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Alabama.
41.
YeganehpourP. (2017). Ice-breaking as a useful teaching policy for both genders. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(22), 137–142.
42.
ZareM.StaufferJ.AlinejadfarshiM. (2023). Mafia: An experiential learning game for OB topics. Management Teaching Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981231185327
