How to Get Promoted 101: Hooking Your OB Students Early With a “What’s In It for Me?” Opener

Abstract

Organizational behavior (OB) students often have difficulty understanding how individual-, group-, and organization-level OB concepts interact to influence employee behavior in the workplace. As a result, students may disengage from the class. Yet the simple prompt of asking students “How do you get promoted?” serves as an effective engagement trigger that helps students link course objectives to valued outcomes. The purpose of this article is to describe a highly interactive, in-class exercise and demonstrate how it can increase in-class participation, help students visualize and appreciate what OB represents, and provide students with a conceptual roadmap for the semester. Due to the learning objectives and format of this exercise, it is intended for undergraduate OB students in a traditional, face-to-face classroom.

Keywords

organizational behavior student engagement interactive in-class exercise traditional classroom visual learning discovery learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auster

E. R.

Wylie

K. K.

(2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: A systematic approach. Journal of Management Education, 30, 333-353.

Bain

(2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barrick

M. R.

Mount

M. K.

(1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.

Bonwell

C. C.

Eison

J.A.

(1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.

Borton

(1970). Reach, touch, and teach: Student concerns and process education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Bruner

J. S.

(1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.

Chase

Germundsen

Brownstein

J. C.

Distad

L. S.

(2001). Making the connection between increased student learning and reflective practice. Educational Horizons, 79(3), 143-147.

Clark

R. E.

(2009). How much and what type of guidance is optimal for learning from instruction? In Tobias

Duffy

T. M.

(Eds.), Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 158-183). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Crane

B. D.

(2017). Teacher openness and prosocial motivation: Creating an environment where questions lead to engaged students. Management Teaching Review, 2, 7-16.

10.

Druckman

Ebner

(2018). Discovery learning in management education: Design and case analysis. Journal of Management Education, 42, 347-374.

11.

French

Raven

(1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright

(Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

12.

Klionsky

D. J.

(1998). Tips for using questions in large classes. The Teaching Professor, 13, 1, 3.

13.

Nilson

L. B.

(2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Robson

(2016). Management learning as collaborative visual encounter: Learning lessons from research and practice. Management Teaching Review, 1, 278-286.

15.

Sousa

D. A.

(2011). How the brain learns (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

16.

Vince

Warren

(2012). Participatory visual methods. In Cassell

Symon

(Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 275-295). London, England: Sage.

17.

Whitehead

A. N.

(1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: Free Press.