The author contends in this article that work-based learning is the most advantageous method to prepare people to assume mutual responsibility for leadership and management. The reason is that leadership in the current knowledge era is less frequently produced from a single individual; rather, the author claims that it now occurs more often as a dynamic practice that is distributed across a range of individuals. Compared to traditional classroom learning often delivered in off-site settings, work-based learning summons participants to live engagements during which they can reflect on their experience so as to expand and create knowledge while at the same time improve their practice. Accordingly, they develop particular habits and attitudes that give rise to an adoption and appreciation of leadership as a collective practice.
AndersonL.GoldJ.StewartJ.ThorpeR. (Eds.). (2015). A guide to professional doctorates in business and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (McGeeV. W., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
BalesR. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257-263.
4.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
CarrollB.SimpsonB. (2012). Capturing sociality in the movement between frames: An illustration from leadership development. Human Relations, 65, 1283-1309.
6.
ChiaR.HoltR. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27, 635-655.
7.
CrevaniL.LindgrenM.PackendorfJ. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 77-86.
8.
CunliffeA. L.EriksenM. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425-1449.
9.
CunliffeA.ForrayJ.KnightsD. (2002). Considering management education: Insights from critical management studies. Journal of Management Education, 26, 489-495.
10.
DenisJ.-L.LangleyA.RouleauL. (2010). The practice of leadership in the messy world of organizations. Leadership, 6(1), 67-88.
11.
DickensonM.BurgoyneJ.PedlerM. (2010). Virtual action learning: Practices and challenges. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7(1), 59-72.
12.
FenwickT. J. (2004). Toward a critical HRD theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 54, 193-209.
13.
FournierV.GreyC. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53, 7-32.
14.
GoldsteinJ. A.HazyJ. K.LichtensteinB. (2010). Complexity and the nexus of leadership: Leveraging nonlinear science to create ecologies of innovation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
16.
HabermasJ. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (ShaprioJ., Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
17.
HazyJ. K.Uhl-BienM. (2014). Changing the rules: The implications of complexity science for leadership research and practice. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 709-732). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.
LewisA.MarshM. (1987). Action learning: The development of field managers in the Prudential Assurance Company. Journal of Management Development, 6(2), 45-56.
19.
LunenburgF. C. (2011). Leadership versus management: A key distinction—at least in theory. International Journal of Management, Business and Administration, 14(1), 1-4.
20.
MarsickV. J. (1990). Action learning and reflection in the workplace. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 23-46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
McGiverD.Lengnick-HallC. A.Lengnick-HallM. L.RamachandranI. (2013). Understanding work and knowledge management from a knowledge-in-practice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38, 597-620.
22.
NemireR. E.MeyerS. M. (2006). Educating students for practice: Educational outcomes and community experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(1), 1-6.
23.
NicoliniD.GherardiS.YanowD. (2003). Introduction in knowing in organizations. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
24.
RaelinJ. A. (2008a). Emancipatory discourse and liberation. Management Learning, 39, 519-540.
25.
RaelinJ. A. (2008b). Work-based learning: Bridging knowledge and action in the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
RaelinJ. A. (2009). The practice turn-away: Forty years of spoon-feeding in management education. Management Learning, 40, 401-410.
27.
RaelinJ. A. (2013). The manager as facilitator of dialogue. Organization, 20, 818-839.
28.
RaelinJ. A. (2014). Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1742715014558076
29.
ReasonP. (1994). Participation in human inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
SchatzkiT. R.CetinaK. K.von SavignyE. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, England: Routledge.
31.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.
33.
WeinsteinK. (1995). Action learning: A journey in discovery and development. London, England: HarperCollins.
34.
ZaleznikA. (1977). Managers and leaders: Are they different?Harvard Business Review, 55, 67-78.
