Abstract
Background
Nurses frequently suffer from workplace violence, but the public is often not fully aware of the situation because many events are not widely reported.
Methods
This study is an attempt to describe public perceptions of and reactions to reports of incidents of violence against nurses in online newspapers. Articles about such violence in Vietnamese online newspapers published from January to December 2019 as well as readers’ comments on those articles were collected for thematic analysis.
Results
Nine assaults were reported in 152 articles, and 367 comments were left in the threads. The analysis found four themes: 1) proposing punishment, 2) showing sympathy, 3) being skeptical, and 4) taking gender into account. In particular, the audience called for stricter punishment of the assaulters and showed sympathy for the nurses. However, commenters’ prior experiences with poor nursing services sometimes made them skeptical about the motivations of the attackers. Additionally, commenters saw the violence as a conflict between a man (assaulter) and a woman (assaultee) rather than between a client and a professional nurse.
Conclusions
In general, the public showed support to nurses. Nurses should take advantage of this support to advocate improved policies and measures to protect themselves from violence at work.
Workplace violence is described as any threat or physical assault that a worker experiences in association with a job (Schmidt et al., 2019). Among workers in healthcare sectors, nurses are at the highest risk of being victims of such violence (Liu et al., 2019; Phillips, 2016). Studies worldwide indicate that between 59.2% and 94.6% of interviewed nurses have suffered from certain forms of workplace violence. The forms of violence are varied, ranging from verbal aggression or physical assaults to sexual harassment. The most common perpetrators are patients and relatives (ALBashtawy & Aljezawi, 2016; Speroni et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2018; Zainal et al., 2018).
Workplace violence negatively impacts nurses. A systematic review reports that patient aggression has biological effects (fear, anxiety, and even posttraumatic stress disorder), cognitive effects (feeling disrespected, unappreciated, or threatened), emotional effects (anger, insecurity at work), and social effects (reduced willingness to engage with clients, increased skepticism about self-professional competency) on nurses (Needham et al., 2005; Speroni et al., 2014). Experience with workplace violence is also associated with reduced job motivation and satisfaction, increased burnout, lower patient safety, and more adverse incidents (Liu et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2018).
Sadly, nurses are not always willing to report violence (Martinez, 2016). A study by ALBashtawy and Aljezawi (2016) indicates that only 16.6% of victimized nurses actually reported the associated incidents. This points to the risk that the scale and impact of workplace violence might not be appropriately acknowledged by the public. Public awareness and support are important for preventing workplace violence against nurses (Ramacciati et al., 2018). First, the public can advocate for policy and other measures to prevent and manage such violence. In addition, understanding and empathy from the public can be a source of support for nurses to deal with negative experiences. More importantly, if violence against nurses and healthcare workers is seen as unacceptable, such social norms may, to some extent, shape proper behavior among people using healthcare services. Nevertheless, despite the importance of this topic, studies mapping the current views of society on workplace violence among nurses are still in their infancy (Hoyle et al., 2018; Teoh et al., 2019).
The current era is one of social media and online newspapers – channels that provide constant and endless streams of news and events. They also allow the audience to immediately share their reactions to the reported stories. Taking advantage of online media, this study attempts to describe the audience’s ideas on and reactions to news about workplace violence against nurses in online newspapers.
Methods
The objects of this qualitative study were readers’ comments on news articles about workplace violence against nurses in Vietnamese online newspapers. Currently, to enhance interaction, many online newspapers allow readers to leave their comments below the threads. All news articles about incidents of violence were retrieved, and audiences’ comments on the stories were then collected for thematic analysis.
Google was used as the search engine alongside Vietnamese dictionaries to find the terms that could be used interchangeably with violence (bạo hành) in Vietnamese. Two other words were identified, which were “đánh” and “tấn công”. Both mean “assault” or “attack”. To specify the subjects of the search, “nurse” (điều dưỡng) was used as an additional keyword. Hence, three sets of keywords were input separately into Google: (“bạo hành” AND “điều dưỡng”’), (“đánh” AND “điều dưỡng”), and (“tấn công” AND “điều dưỡng”).
The search covered articles published from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019; the two researchers then screened all the resulting news articles found by the search engine together. Any events that specified the victims as nurses but that were related to the nurses’ personal lives were excluded. All reader comments on the articles were retrieved for the analysis.
The search engine found ten discrete incidents of violence against nurses, but one event was excluded because it was a personal conflict, not an incident of workplace violence. In total, there were 122 articles about the nine events and 26 other articles that were discussions about workplace violence against nurses in general (Table 1). Among these articles, 31 had comments from readers. In total, 367 comments were retrieved. The description of each violent incident was developed by two researchers (NHL, LTT) and cross-checked by two others (NTMC, TTA).
Incidents of Workplace Violence Reported in Online Newspapers (From January to December 2020).
Thematic analysis was used to identify the patterns of meaning in the data. The analysis was performed in six steps as proposed by Braun and Clarke (2006; Nowell et al., 2017). Each individual researcher first read all the descriptions of the violent incidents along with the relevant comments and then examined all comments as a whole to become familiar with the data. Comments from all individual events were then aggregated for the researchers to develop their own codes from the data, using inductive approach. All the researchers then worked in groups to collate all the initial codes, based on which they identified, reviewed, and defined themes and prepared the report.
Results
Three hundred sixty-seven comments are found. Commonly, comments are short, with two to five sentences. The comments usually aim to narrate readers’ feelings and thoughts about the news they have read. Very few comments are in form of interactive conversations between readers. The analysis finds four themes: 1) proposing punishment, 2) showing sympathy, 3) being skeptical, and 4) taking gender into account.
Proposing Punishment
Commenters advocate for punishment of those who assault nurses. They proposed different forms of punishments. One of the most common ideas is to imprison the attackers. “I request that the government officers bring him (the assaulter) to court…because he destroyed public property, created chaos in public, and harmed others’ health…. He should also pay money to compensate for what he has done.” “The assaulter should be put in prison plus given a monetary fine. His portrait, name, and address should also be exposed to everyone to create public pressure on such bad behavior.” “If any patient attacks healthcare providers, either verbally or physically, the Ministry of Health should prohibit them from using medical services for a year.” “If someone behaves like that on an airplane, the aviation authority has the right to refuse him in the future. Why can’t they (assaulters) be banned from using medical services when something similar happens in healthcare? It is unfair.” “If these persons are not disciplined properly, one day, doctors and nurses will not dare to work in hospitals.” “If the authorities give a light punishment to people who assault healthcare staff, the problem will not end. Indeed, it will get worse. I recommend that the government properly discipline this criminal so that healthcare providers feel safe at work.” “The healthcare profession should be treated as a special job…. People are using alcohol as an excuse to attack those who are saving others’ lives. The law should be revised to prevent this kind of crime.”
Showing Sympathy
Commenters also express sympathy, appreciation and encouragement toward nurses and healthcare workers. They understand the workload and pressures that nurses have to handle in their daily work. Interestingly, they feel sorry for nurses, who earn a low income but have to face danger. “The emergency department is the place to save severely ill patients’ lives…. Any violence should be strictly punished. People should know that the salaries of nurses are very low. Poor them for being assaulted.” “Hospital [name not disclosed here; the location of one violent incident] is extremely overloaded because patients from surrounding areas also come there. I took my kids to the outpatient department several times and saw that the nurses and doctors were gracious. In the hospital, children are crying out loud, and there is lots of pressure. I myself got a headache, but they have to work there every day.” “I hope all nurses are loved and try their best to complete their missions. There is always hope somewhere. Keep thinking that way to motivates yourselves.”
Being Skeptical
Some commenters are skeptical about the causes of violence. They assume that there must be provocations for the violent behavior. Many of them use their previous experiences in hospitals as a basis for their interpretation. Notably, such experiences lead to negative viewpoints about healthcare providers' attitudes and communication. Some refer explicitly to nurses, some mention doctors, and some mention both nurses and doctors. “I believe that there must be a reason. Everyone who goes to hospitals has witnessed the attitudes of nurses and doctors. Not all of them are enthusiastic and kind. Previously, my daughter had a fever of 42 degrees Celsius. She screamed, and I took her to the emergency department. The doctor told me to take her to the pediatric ward, but the pediatric ward asked me to take her back to the emergency department. I went back there, and the doctor told me, ‘Can’t you see another patient just had an accident? Put her here. Don’t worry, she will not die’”. “Attacking others is wrong, but everything has a reason. No one gets mad voluntarily. Let’s wait for the results of the police investigation”. “All hospital staff should learn communication skills to behave appropriately with patients’ emotions. I see many cold-hearted and bossy mannerisms among such staff when patients are upset.” “Honestly, many hospital staff, especially nurses, communicate with patients and their families very impolitely. Of course, I do not support the father [who slapped the nurse], but I have a feeling [that his behavior might have been motivated by such impoliteness].”
Taking Gender Into Account
Many commenters not only judge violence through the lens of the professional relationship between healthcare providers and patients. They also think of such violence as inappropriate behavior of males toward females for the simple reason that a man should not attack a woman. Notably, this kind of comment is not specific to any individual incident. It is quite common across all events. “He is only good at bullying a woman who is saving his friend’s life. So raffish. He is an embarrassment of a man.” “What a bad guy. He had to be hospitalized because he fought with others and then he attacks the FEMALE nurse” [capitals in original]. “He looks like a tiger, but he assaults a weak woman.” “It is unacceptable that a big, tall guy assaulted a woman. She is just a weak woman. I feel so angry seeing the video. He should be punished.”
Discussion
Nurses suffer from severe violence at work, and it has been reported that staff nurses in emergency departments and in mental health institutions are at higher risk (Phillips, 2016). The present study also found that the majority of the incidents occurred in such settings (Table 1). All the reported incidents were physical attacks, so it is evident that there is an urgent need to protect nurses in their workplaces.
Sadly, most of the victims were attacked because the perpetrators were drunk and were not able to control their behavior, which seems to be a convenient excuse for the assaulters (Ramacciati et al., 2017). It should also be noted that currently in Vietnam, if an attack does not cause severe injury to the victim or lead to damage to hospital property, the perpetrators are simply fined a small amount of money. However, this study finds that the public often demands stricter punishments. Even though some of the proposed punishments, such as prohibiting assaulters from using healthcare services in the future, would not be applicable, it is encouraging that the public sees a need for better measures to prevent violence in healthcare environments. This sentiment could offer strong support for any future policies.
It should be noted that commenters expressed their sympathy toward the nurses but at the same time were curious about why the assaulters were provoked. There is a saying in Vietnamese, “No fire, no smoke”, which implies that nothing happens without a cause. The perpetrators often expressed their experiences with poor nursing and healthcare services as a catalyst for their violent behavior; however, such arguments are dangerous because they can lead to a perception that the victims deserved to be attacked, which normalizes the view that nurses can be assaulted if they underperform. Nurses, for their part, are accustomed to workplace violence and consider it part of their job (ALBashtawy & Aljezawi, 2016; Schmidt et al., 2019). The implications of these two perceptions undermine efforts to protect nurses from violence at work. Hence, improving nursing services, enhancing understanding of the nursing profession among patients, and encouraging nurses to stand up for their own safety seem to be equally important approaches to protecting nurses (Ramacciati et al., 2018).
It was found that commenters considered attacking nurses, as professional healthcare workers, unacceptable. However, they also believed that assaulting nurses cannot be tolerated because nurses are women. In other words, commenters not only saw a patient attacking a nurse but also perceived a man hurting a woman. This is to an extent understandable because nursing has traditionally been considered a feminine occupation (Hoeve et al., 2014). However, if commenters have this perception, they are considering violence in terms of a personal rather than professional relationship between patient and nurse, which might not be the appropriate perception. Any violence at work should be seen as a professional, not personal, issue. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to further explore this viewpoint of the public.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study reveals that the public expressed great sympathy toward the nurses who had been assaulted and believed that more aggressive penalties should be imposed on perpetrators. Additionally, experiences with poor nursing services made some commenters express skepticism about what may have provoked the behavior of the perpetrators. The violence was also viewed as a conflict between a man (assaulter) and a woman (assaultee) rather than between a client and a nurse. In general, commenters showed support for nurses. Nurses should take advantage of this support to advocate improved policies and measures to protect themselves from violence at work.
Study Limitations
The findings of this study relied on violent incidents that were exclusively reported in Vietnamese online newspapers. Despite the differing forms of violence that occurred in the incidents, all the news items retrieved in this study were about physical attacks. Therefore, the findings may better reflect public reactions to assaults rather than workplace violence in general. In addition, it appears that not all readers left comments on what they read, so a range of different ideas and voices have not been heard and integrated into the findings. More importantly, the nature of this study does not allow direct verification of the findings or control of the sample selection. These issues may lead to limited confirmability of the findings.
Footnotes
Ethical Approval
Since this study did not involve human subjects, no ethical approval was required.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
