Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

There is documented evidence pointing to the fact that there are numerous challenges with postoperative pain (POP) management globally. However, these challenges with POP management are more profound in developing countries.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the knowledge, attitude, and practices of nurses concerning POP management in four selected district hospitals in Ghana.

Methodology

A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was employed to evaluate nurse's knowledge, attitude, and practices pertaining to POP management. Multistaged sampling was used to draw the respondents. An adapted version of the Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain instrument was used to test the knowledge, attitude, and practices of nurses and midwives. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data in order to present quantitative descriptions of variables in this study.

Results

This study showed that nurses in the four district hospitals had knowledge deficits regarding POP management. Eighty-one representing 48% of nurses had low knowledge on POP management. An overwhelming majority of nurses (97.6%) relied on routinely rendered basic nursing skills to relieve POP and a few used pharmacological interventions. However, nurses had good attitudes toward POP management.

Conclusions

POP is ineffectively managed by nurses in district hospitals in Ghana. Nurses and midwives in Ghana need to adhere to best practices in POP management by increasing their theoretical and practical knowledge, so that there will be tangible positive change in POP management in Ghana.

Recommendations

Nurses must be empowered through continuous development programs to keep abreast with changing trends that pertain to POP management.

Keywords

cross-sectional studies hospital nursing pain management

Background

Although the aim of the International Association for the Study of Pain (2018) is to translate the study of pain management into improved pain relief worldwide, postoperative pain (POP) continues to be an issue of concern in modern day surgical practice. Despite the availability of many preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions and management strategies for reducing and managing POP, most surgical patients still experience acute POP, of which less than half report adequate POP relief (Chou et al., 2016). POP has costly implications as it is associated with legal and ethical ramifications (Francis & Fitzpatrick, 2013). There is also documented evidence pointing to the fact that there are numerous challenges with POP management that is more profound in developing countries as a result of inadequate resource allocations for pain management (Kizza, Muliira, Kohi, & Nabirye, 2016; Murray & Retief, 2015; Woldehaimanot, Eshetie, & Kerie, 2014). Half the number of postoperative patients still report inadequate pain management despite efforts from worldwide authorities in creating awareness on the effects of inadequate POP management (Admassu, Hailekiros, & Abdissa, 2016; Albrecht et al., 2013; Chou et al., 2016; Fletcher et al., 2015; Kolvekar, Pilegaard, Ashley, Simon, & Grant, 2016; Lorentzen, Hermansen, & Botti, 2012). Inadequate assessment and documentation is attributed to the high incidence of acute pain experienced by patients. A study by Eder, Sloan, and Todd (2003) showed that documentation of pain subsequent to therapy was noted on only 39% of charts evaluated, and a pain scale was used only 19% of the time.

Empirical evidence has shown that there is need to relieve POP within a reasonable time frame because of its negative effects on clinical outcomes (Bruckenthal & Simpson, 2016; Francis & Fitzpatrick, 2013). Inadequately controlled pain negatively affects quality of life, function, and functional recovery (Kehlet, Jensen, & Woolf, 2006). Inadequately controlled pain can also lead to postsurgical complications and persistent postsurgical pain (Kehlet et al., 2006). Acute pain can lead to the development of chronic pain syndromes (Kehlet et al., 2006). Although it is common to expect some pain after surgery as part of the inflammatory process, POP must be minimized by the health-care team to ensure patient satisfaction and comfort (Meissner et al., 2015).

Literature Review

As cited in literature, ineffective or inappropriate POP management may affect the health system especially in these modern times when healthcare is a business and patient satisfaction is a key to sustaining the business (Glowacki, 2015; Macrae, 2008). Often, POP management is particularly challenging to assess and manage. This is because, accurate assessment of pain depends on patients' ability to describe or verbalize pain. Patients may not be able to describe their pain as they recover from the effects of anesthesia. It is also difficult to diagnose other discomforts that occur with surgical procedures such as having an intravenous line in situ (Pasero, 2009; Turk & Melzack, 2011). However, there are several effective assessment tools and therapeutic approaches for POP management that nurses can utilize (Aziato, Dedey, Marfo, Asamani, & Clegg-Lamptey, 2015; Chou et al., 2016; Hawker, Mian, Kendzerska, & French, 2011). These therapeutic approaches include increasing analgesic doses or adding other analgesics if behaviors indicating pain persist or increase, or if additional painful pathology or procedures occur (Pasero, 2009). In patients who are unresponsive, no change in behavior will be evident; therefore, the optimized analgesic doses should be continued (Pasero, 2009). Recent studies also suggest the use of an interdisciplinary pain team and multimodal regimens in many situations (Glowacki, 2015; McDaid et al., 2010). Thus, no surgical patient deserves to suffer unnecessarily.

Nurses play a vital role in POP management and therefore require thorough knowledge and skill in managing POP (Chatchumni, Namvongprom, Eriksson, & Mazaheri, 2016). In most health-care settings, nurses constitute the biggest population of the health workforce and have 24-hour direct contact with patients (World Health Organization, 2016). Consequently, nurses are well placed to manage pain in the postoperative setting and must ensure that their interventions are tailored to suit individual preferences and comfort. However, some previous studies in POP management identified suboptimal pain management practices among nurses which were attributed to nurses' professional culture, ward culture, inadequate requisite theoretical knowledge, lack of priority toward pain management, and lack of clarity on the evidence base for different pain management interventions (Eccleston, 2011; Twycross, 2007).

Successful pain management must be developed by nurses working in postoperative units (World Health Organization, 2016). Some previous studies have also indicated that POP management should involve caring, commitment, therapeutic communication, appropriate assessment, good knowledge, and use of evidence-based multimodal approaches as well as proper evaluation of interventions in the presence of other variables such as cultural factors (Abdalrahim, Majali, Stomberg, & Bergbom, 2011; Elshamy & Ramzy, 2011; Yüceer, 2011).

Interestingly, there are reports of lack of patient assessment, negative perceptions, poor documentation, and inappropriate use of analgesics as challenges to pain management by nurses worldwide (Masigati & Chilonga, 2014; White & Kehlet, 2010). Some authors have attributed increased nursing workloads, communication gaps, lack of knowledge on POP management, and organizational change issues as the possible barriers to effective POP management (Glowacki, 2015; Meissner et al., 2015; Subramanian, Allcock, James, & Lathlean, 2012). For effective and appropriate pain management after surgery, patients require a combination of treatment modalities. It has been shown that nurses rely on and use sparingly singular strategies to manage pain (McDonald, LaPorta, & Meadows-Oliver, 2007).

Pain management by nurses is widely researched in developed countries (Francis & Fitzpatrick, 2013; Schreiber et al., 2014; Wang & Tsai, 2010). However, in developing countries like Ghana, this phenomenon is not well understood due to dearth of research on the subject of POP management. Recently, Aziato and Adejumo (2013) conducted a qualitative study in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra and discovered that there were major challenges affecting POP management in Ghana. These authors suggested that quantitative studies on POP management are urgently needed to give a complete understanding of the phenomenon. To the best of our knowledge, existing Ghanaian studies have been qualitative in nature, focused on other health professionals, and have explored pain in the larger teaching hospitals. This study examined the knowledge, attitude, and practices of nurses regarding POP nursing management in four selected district hospitals in Ghana.

Methods

Research Design

A descriptive, cross-sectional approach was used to evaluate nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practices pertaining to POP management. Multistaged sampling was used to draw the respondents. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data.

Study Setting

The study involved 4 district hospitals selected from 78 health-care facilities in the Ashanti region of Ghana. The choice of the hospitals was based on predetermined criteria to ensure they had similar characteristics. All the hospitals fell under the Ministry of Health/Christian Health Association of Ghana categorization tier C (District hospitals). In addition, they all performed surgeries and had a higher population of nurses from which to draw the sample. Study Site 1 had a total population of 45 nurses. Site 2 had a total population of 95 nurses. Site 3 had a population of 88 nurses. Site 4 had a total population of 146 nurses (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Number of Nurses by Hospital.

Hospitals	Number of staff nurses
Site 1	45
Site 2	95
Site 3	88
Site 4	146
Total	374

Sample Size and Sampling Technique

Israel's (1992) method of determining sample size for small population was applied to arrive at a sample size of 194 nurses from a total population of 374 (at ±5% precision level with 95% confidence level and a p value of .05). In the first stage, stratified sampling was done.

The sample size for each of the hospitals (stratum) was then calculated using Israel's (1992) formula: f = n/N, where n is the sample size, N is the size of population, and f is the constant proportion.

Therefore, f = 194/375 = 0.52.

Site 1 = 45 × 0.52 = 23.40 = 23 nurses and midwives

Site 2 = 95 × 0.52 = 49.4 = 49 nurses and midwives

Site 3 = 88 × 0.52 = 45.76 = 46 nurses and midwives

Site 4 = 146 × 0.52 = 75.92 = 76 nurses and midwives.

After determining the sample size for each facility (stratum), simple random selection was used to select respondents using the lottery method, to ensure equal chance of selection. Of the 194 surveys sent out, 168 respondents answered and returned questionnaire, and 26 questionnaires were not returned.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Nurses and midwives with a minimum qualification of a certificate from the Nursing and Midwifery Council of Ghana, who have practiced or nursed a surgical patient for at least 6 months or more and work in the selected hospitals were eligible to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria included staff otherwise referred to as “nurse” in the Ghanaian context, yet without the minimum qualification and not licensed to administer strong analgesia.

Instrument for Data Collection

An adapted version of the Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (NKASRP; Ferrell & McCaffery, 2012) instrument was used to test the knowledge, attitude, and practices of nurses and midwives. The modified final instrument consisted of four parts. Part 1 sought Demographic Information. Part 2 was the Knowledge Scale and made up of 13 questions about pain management. Part 3 (Attitude Scale) was made up of a 3-point Likert Scale and consisted of 14 questions that asked respondents opinion on attitudinal statements. Part 4 (Practice Scale) was also made up of a 4-point Likert Scale and consisted of 27 items that asked respondents opinion on how often they utilized pain assessment tools (8) and other practice interventions (19). Multiple choice questions within original NKASRP instrument was modified into true or false questions to make it easier for respondents to complete. Some questions that were found in literature to be important in an African setting were added to the original NKASRP instrument. Case studies with subsequent questions in original instrument were also modified into a Likert scale for easy response. Cronbach's coefficient alpha was calculated for the various scales. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .869 which indicated that the instrument had an adequate internal consistency.

Data Collection Procedure

Institutional review board (IRB) approval was granted by the University of Cape Coast (UCC). Introductory letters from the UCC were sent to the institutions where the study was to be carried out. After determining the sample size for each facility (stratum), simple random selection was used to select respondents using the lottery method. Written consent was obtained from nurses who agreed to participate in the study. Respondents were met in a group and informed about the purpose of the study and its procedures. Data collection spanned 2 months from December 2013 to January 2014. Respondents who agreed to partake in the study were assured of confidentiality as they were required not to provide any form of identification on the questionnaire. Each of the questionnaires had an informed consent form attached for respondents to fill out before participation. Approximately, 45 minutes were spent on completing the questionnaire.

Data Analysis

Data were cleaned, coded, and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Data collected with modified NKASRP were entered into SPSS. Descriptive statistics of various variables within the questionnaire was run to arrive at frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. These statistics are presented in Table 2. Nurses' level of knowledge was assessed as either adequate or inadequate based on the percentage of respondents who scored more than half of the 13-point scale assessment of knowledge. Sixty percent of respondents were expected to score more than half of the 13-point scale assessment of knowledge to have adequate knowledge.

Table 2.

Demographic Data of Respondents (n = 168).

Variables	Frequency	Percent
Gender
Males	34	20.2
Females	134	79.8
Age (in years)
20–30	115	68.5
31–40	31	18.5
41–50	6	3.6
51–60	12	7.1
>60	4	2.3
Level of education
Certificate	10	6.0
Diploma	125	74.4
Degree	32	19.0
Postgraduate degree	1	0.6
Nursing grade
Staff nurse	84	50.0
Staff midwife	29	17.3
Nursing officer	34	20.2
Senior nursing officer	5	3.0
Principal nursing officer	15	8.9
Deputy director of nursing services	1	0.6
Years of surgical experience (in years)
Less than a year	69	41.1
1–5	74	44.0
6–10	13	7.7
11–15	7	4.2
16–20	2	1.2
>20	3	1.8

Ethical Considerations

IRB approval was granted by the UCC. Introductory letters from the UCC were sent to the institutions where the study was to be carried out. IRB approval was obtained from only the UCC because the study sites had no IRBs. Research assistants signed consent for confidentiality and were trained to ensure protection of confidentiality of subject's information. Written consent was obtained from participants before the start of data collection. The questionnaire used to collect the data contained numbers and no names were used to identify participants.

Results

Demographic Data of Respondents

There were 79.8% respondents being females and 20.2% being males. The results revealed that 115 (68.5%) of respondents were aged 20 to 30 years. The results indicated cultural and ethnic diversity among the respondents. Majority of the respondents had diploma and certificate qualifications in nursing with a few respondents being degree holders. Majority (67.3%) were staff nurses and midwives while the remaining were nursing officers, principal nursing, and senior nursing officers. Most nurses had below 5 years surgical nursing experience (Table 2).

Knowledge of Nurses and Midwives on POP Management

Respondents who scored 7 or less out of a total score of 13 were classified as having inadequate knowledge and a score of 8 or above were otherwise considered as having adequate knowledge on POP management. The results revealed that 81 representing 48% nurses had inadequate knowledge on POP management. Seven questions (Questions 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12) were most frequently answered correctly. Five questions (Questions 2, 3, 4, 11, and 13) were most frequently answered incorrectly (Table 3).

Table 3.

Knowledge of POP Management (n = 168).

Knowledge about POP management	True		False		Correct answer
Knowledge about POP management	No.	%	No.	%	T/F
Q1. Pain is what the patient says it is.	146	86.9	22	13.1	T
Q2. Acute pain lasts for 20 to 30 days.	22	13.1	146	86.9	T
Q3. The most accurate judge of the intensity of the patient's pain is the patient's primary nurse.	98	58.3	70	41.7	F
Q4. Vital signs are always reliable indicators of the intensity of a patient's pain.	105	62.5	63	37.5	F
Q5. Pain assessment includes onset, duration, variability, location, and intensity of pain.	165	98.2	3	1.8	T
Q6. Glasgow Coma Scale is a pain assessment tool.	95	56.5	73	43.5	F
Q7. When using the WHO pain ladder to treat acute pain, treatment should go from bottom to top.	116	69.0	52	31.0	T
Q8. Using pain management assessment tool is not integral in POP management.	35	20.8	133	79.2	F
Q9. Untreated POP delays recovery.	147	87.5	21	12.5	T
Q10. Effective analgesia is an essential part of POP management.	163	97.0	5	3.0	T
Q11. The recommended route of administration of opioid analgesics with brief, severe pain of sudden onset such as POP is intramuscular.	123	73.2	45	26.8	F
Q12. Analgesics for POP should initially be given around the clock on a fixed schedule.	109	64.9	59	35.1	T
Q13. Naloxone antagonizes (reverses) all opiates, but its effect quickly wears off.	112	66.7	56	33.3	F

Note. POP = postoperative pain; WHO = World Health Organization; T = true; F = false.

Attitudes of Respondents Toward POP Management

Table 4 shows that with a mean value of 2.88 and variation of 0.992, majority (92.2%) of the nurses agreed that effective analgesia was an essential part of postoperative management. Similarly, 141 (83.9%) reported that lack of pain expression did not mean lack of pain. With regard to whether their visual assessment of the patient reporting pain influenced their responses and treatment of POP, 127 (75.6%) responded they agreed while the remaining either disagreed or were indifferent. Another issue that respondents claimed to have influenced them was the type of surgery done. Here, 120 (71.4%) of the nurses said that they responded to pain depending on the type of surgery performed. Again, respondents most often believed the following factors influenced the degree to which they cared for patients: pain anticipation in all surgical procedures before assessing and treating pain, the use of measurement instruments, patient's spiritual beliefs, analgesic opioids should not be administered to patients with a history of substance abuse, and patient's right to expect total POP relief as a consequence of treatment.

Table 4.

Attitudes of Respondents Toward POP Management (n = 168).

Interventions/measures	Agree		Don't know		Disagree
Interventions/measures	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%	Mean	SD
Your cultural background affects your nursing care of a patient's report of pain.	45	26.8	6	3.6	117	69.6	1.57	0.542
Your patient should experience discomfort prior to giving the next dose of pain medications.	31	18.5	9	5.4	128	76.1	1.42	0.639
Your visual assessment of the patient reporting pain influences your response and treatment of POP.	127	75.6	2	1.2	39	23.2	2.52	0.883
The patient who frequently requests pain medication influences your response time to analgesic administration.	74	44.0	2	1.2	92	54.8	1.89	0.500
You anticipate pain in all surgical procedures before you assess and treat pain in a patient.	142	84.5	4	2.4	22	13.1	2.71	0.882
Using pain measurement instruments is integral in postoperative pain management.	138	82.2	15	8.9	15	8.9	2.73	0.351
Patients should be encouraged to endure as much pain as possible before using an opioid.	56	33.3	10	6.0	102	60.7	1.73	0.456
A patient's spiritual beliefs may lead them to think pain and suffering are necessary.	81	48.2	22	13.1	65	38.7	2.10	0.567
Analgesic opioids should not be administered to patients with a history of substance abuse.	87	51.8	19	11.3	62	36.9	2.15	0.351
It is a patient's right to expect total postoperative pain relief as a consequence of treatment.	125	75.6	8	4.8	33	19.6	2.52	0.988
Morphine is a very strong drug. POP patients would be content with just one dose.	63	37.5	21	12.5	84	50.0	1.88	0.778
The type of surgery done affects your response to pain management.	120	71.4	3	1.8	45	26.8	2.45	0.742
Lack of pain expression does not mean lack of pain.	141	83.9	8	4.8	19	11.3	2.73	0.983
Effective analgesia is an essential part of postoperative management	155	92.2	5	3.0	8	4.8	2.88	0.992

POP = postoperative pain.

Practices of Nurses on POP Management

With regard to management interventions, an overwhelming majority (97.6%) of the nurses said they provided clean, calm, and a well-ventilated ward environment postoperatively. Another highly effective intervention used by the nurses was the encouragement of early ambulation/exercise with analgesia. Here, as many as 97.0% claimed to have used this measure. About 73% and 25.6% of the respondents reported that they usually dressed, bandaged, splinted, and reinforced wound sites postoperatively. Most of these interventions mostly chosen by the nurses are among the basic treatments of POP by nurses globally.

Interestingly, the use of music therapy to reduce pain, giving pethidine frequently to manage pain in children, encouraging the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator, and the use of acupuncture interventions had minimal to no available responses (Table 5). This could mainly be due to the unavailability of certain critical instruments and drugs for carrying out certain interventions.

Table 5.

Nursing Interventions Used in POP Management.

Interventions/measures	Always		Sometimes		Never		Not available
Interventions/measures	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
I provide clean, calm, and a well-ventilated ward environment for POP management.	130	77.4	34	20.2	3	1.8	1	0.6
I lay patients on neat, well-laid bed postoperatively.	152	90.5	15	8.9	0	0.0	1	0.6
I use patient distraction, relaxation, and guided imagery postoperatively to reduce pain.	51	35.1	78	46.4	25	14.9	6	3.6
I use music therapy to reduce pain.	20	11.9	52	31.0	74	44.0	22	13.1
I use massaging and stretching to reduce POP.	21	12.5	75	44.7	58	34.5	14	8.3
I apply heat and cold compresses to manage POP.	42	25.0	91	54.1	30	17.9	5	3.0
I encourage prayer or meditation by patient or religious leader postoperatively.	32	19.0	83	49.4	45	26.8	8	4.8
I encourage use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator	2	1.2	4	2.4	82	48.8	80	47.6
I encourage use of acupuncture.	2	1.2	10	6.0	85	50.5	71	42.3
I encourage early ambulation/exercise with analgesia.	115	68.4	48	28.6	1	0.6	4	2.4
I dress, bandage, splint, and reinforce wound sites postoperatively.	122	72.6	43	25.6	2	1.2	1	0.6
I give opioids on a regular schedule.	61	36.3	85	50.6	20	11.9	2	1.2
I give opioids to pediatric patients as well as adult patients postoperatively.	30	17.9	93	55.4	37	22.0	8	4.8
I give patients sterile water by injection (placebo) to determine if the pain is real.	17	10.1	83	49.4	53	31.6	15	8.9
I combine opioids with NSAID's rather than single analgesic agents when managing POP as suggested by World Health Organization.	21	12.5	75	44.7	53	31.5	19	11.3
I give analgesics for postoperative pain only when the patient asks for the medication.	15	8.9	54	32.1	90	53.6	9	5.4
I give pethidine frequently to manage pain in children.	7	4.2	35	20.8	117	69.6	9	5.4
After I have given opioid analgesic, I administer subsequent doses to suit individual patient's response.	22	13.1	62	36.9	72	42.9	12	7.1

POP = postoperative pain; NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Discussion

Nurses and midwives are key stakeholders where POP management is concerned as they have more patient contact around the clock. Unfortunately, literature cites these professionals as faulting in effective POP management. This study sought to examine the knowledge, attitude, and practices of nurses on POP management in four selected district hospitals in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

This study revealed that nurses in the four hospitals had inadequate knowledge regarding POP management. These findings are consistent with other studies by other researchers (Aziato & Adejumo, 2013; Francis & Fitzpatrick, 2013; Lewthwaite et al., 2011) who also found inadequate knowledge of nurses in POP management. Several reasons could be linked to this finding. The study was conducted in district settings where nurses seldom had access to training programs on pain management. In addition, most nurses who answered the questionnaire had less than 5 years' experience and this could have impacted negatively on their knowledge.

Also, the majority of nurses had basic qualifications in nursing (74.4%) and only a few (19.0%) possessed degrees as shown in Table 2. Although 52% scored above 8 out of the 13 questions on knowledge scale, they could be rated as having inadequate knowledge since the total percentage of respondents answering more than half of the 13-point scale fell short of the 60% needed to be rated as having adequate knowledge. Many nurses (48%) lacked sufficient practical knowledge to function effectively in managing POP. These findings are similar to other studies which concluded that nurses faulted in their knowledge of pharmacological remedies in POP (Abdalrahim et al., 2011; Francis & Fitzpatrick, 2013; Rafati, Soltaninejad, Aflatoonian, & Mashayekhi, 2016; Wang & Tsai, 2010). A study by Se, Yc, Rozainiee, and Ho (2009) concluded that nurses require regular in-service education to boost their knowledge in pain management. Similarly, a previous Ghanaian study found inadequate knowledge on pain management by nurses (Aziato & Adejumo, 2013). Their study identified gaps in student curricula during training, reduced clinical supervision, limited workshops for practicing nurses among others. Evidence available shows that significant positive change in knowledge can be achieved through brief interactive workshops to correct misconceptions and equip practicing nurses with safe and sound knowledge to deliver their duties (Gustafsson & Borglin, 2013). It has been highlighted that nurses have a low appreciation for pain management in general and this could be attributed to flaws in the curriculum (Chow & Chan, 2015; McCaffery, Pasero, & Ferrell, 2007). Nurse leaders need to use advocacy to make a strong case for continuing education programs in pain management and must ensure that all stakeholders including the Ministry of Health are aware of this problem. Moreover, Ghana has a deficiency in Bachelor prepared nurses. Meanwhile evidence shows that clinical outcomes are maximized with degree prepared nurses (Yakusheva, Lindrooth, & Weiss, 2014). In one study, researchers found that bachelor prepared nurses had good pain management practices as they administered opioids to patients better than nurses with lower qualifications (Rafati et al., 2016). Thus, a strong case must be made for degree nursing in Ghana.

Our study revealed that nurses had positive attitudes toward pain management. Respondents had good attitudes as they identified that lack of pain expression was not lack of pain and also identified that nurses must anticipate pain before assessment and treatment. In addition, most of the respondents agreed that POP management was part of the management in postoperative care and part of the patient's rights. A previous study showed that in some circumstances, nurses may have inadequate knowledge but good attitudes and are able to practice good POP management when their attitude is positive (Miller, 2012). However, respondents seemed to agree that visual assessment influences their response to managing patients' pain. This attitude, as may pertain to some cultures (Narayan, 2010), is a potential barrier in achieving optimal pain relief after surgery. Numerous studies show that this must not be relied on as the only indication or assessment and that the patient's verbalization of pain regardless of facial expression should be taken seriously (Chatchumni et al., 2016; Francis & Fitzpatrick, 2013; Koneti & Jones, 2013; Ruben, van Osch, & Blanch-Hartigan, 2015).

When examining management practices, there was a mismatch between what respondents described in the attitude section and what they actually practiced. Although many respondents (92%) indicated that effective analgesia is part of pain management, only 4.2% suggested they would administer a narcotic analgesic to children with POP and only 36.3% also admitted they gave opioids on regular basis. Aziato and Adejumo (2014) found that personal factors such as lack of commitment, fear of administering opioids, and fear of addiction to opioid analgesics may contribute to its low usage by nurses. It is important to note that sociocultural factors could also account for the reason why nurses may not administer pharmacologic interventions (Jones, 2012). In Ghana, some cultural norms do not support outward demonstration of pain especially in men (Aziato & Adejumo, 2015). Dissimilar results have, however, been documented in literature. Nurses preferred pharmacological interventions which they find simple as opposed to employing basic nursing interventions to improve comfort and reduce POP (Mackintosh, 2007; Rafati et al., 2016).

The results of this study provided valuable information and avenues for the development of future studies. Studies in other districts and regions in Ghana are necessary to allow for generalization. Interventional or experimental studies as pertained in other countries can be replicated to assess the impact of a structured educational program on pain management and documentation for nurses in Ghana. Studies to develop cultural and language relevant pain assessment tools in our local dialects to enhance pain assessment are recommended. Subsequent studies involving the patient will be necessary. This can involve patients who have lived experiences with POP in the district hospital setting.

Conclusion

Nurses in this study self-reported inadequate nursing intervention and assessment skills in the management of POP. This is a result of inadequate knowledge as well as limited range of practices utilized by nurses to offset the deleterious effects of POP as the study identified. However, Ghanaian nurses have good attitudes which can be harnessed to translate into evidence-based practices in POP management. There must be a paradigm shift in POP management by Ghanaian nurses. Nurses must be empowered through continuous development programs to keep abreast with changing trends pertaining to pain management postoperatively. This would ensure quality of care, improve nursing care, patient satisfaction, and ultimately improve patient outcomes in Ghana.

Implication of Study

Curricula revisions in colleges of nursing in Ghana are necessary for effective education of nursing students in POP management. Nurse leaders could also advocate for more degree nursing institutions rather than diploma nursing education as currently exist in Ghana. This is important since evidence shows that degree nurses are better managers of pain. Of equal importance is the need to review and update the pharmacology content in the various nursing programs in Ghana to encompass new trends in assessments, documentation, and management of POP. Interventional or experimental studies in the area of POP management should be encouraged in Ghana in order to help address the challenges that confront nurses in effective management of POP.

Limitation of Study

This study was carried out in only Ashanti region, which is one out of 10 regions in Ghana. Although sample size calculation formula was used in identifying a sample size for this study, there is need to include more regions and more hospitals in Ghana in order to better generalize the findings to Ghana. The study considered only district hospitals which are smaller hospitals in comparison to regional and teaching hospitals in Ghana. It will be necessary to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nurses within regional and teaching hospitals in order to have a holistic understanding of nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in hospitals in Ghana.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their profound gratitude to the nurses who took time off their busy schedules to fill out the questionnaire.

Authors' Contributions

A. M., I. G., S. A. A., and D. F. A. conceptualized the study. A. M. collected the data. A. M., I. G., and S. A. A. analyzed the data. I. G., C. A., and A. M. drafted the manuscript and all the others edited and approved the content.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Abdalrahim

M. S.

Majali

S. A.

Stomberg

M. W.

Bergbom

(2011) The effect of postoperative pain management program on improving nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pain. Nurse Education in Practice 11(4): 250–255.

Admassu

W. S.

Hailekiros

A. G.

Abdissa

Z. D.

(2016) Severity and risk factors of post-operative pain in University of Gondar Hospital, Northeast Ethiopa. Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research 7(10): 675doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000675.

Albrecht

Taffe

Yersin

Schoettker

Decosterd

Hugli

(2013) Undertreatment of acute pain (oligoanalgesia) and medical practice variation in prehospital analgesia of adult trauma patients: A 10 yr retrospective study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 110(1): 96–106. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes355.

Aziato

Adejumo

(2013) Perspectives of the surgeons, anaesthetists, and pharmacists on post-operative pain management roles in the Ghanaian context. African Journal for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance 19(3): 678–691.

Aziato

Adejumo

(2014) Determinants of nurses' knowledge gap on pain management in Ghana. Nurse Education in Practice 14(2): 195–199. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.004.

Aziato

Adejumo

(2015) An ethnographic exploration of postoperative pain experiences among Ghanaian surgical patients. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 26(3): 301–307. doi: 10.1177/1043659614526246.

Aziato

Dedey

Marfo

Asamani

J. A.

Clegg-Lamptey

J. N. A.

(2015) Validation of three pain scales among adult postoperative patients in Ghana. BMC Nursing 14: 42doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0094-6.

Bruckenthal

Simpson

M. H.

(2016) The role of the perioperative nurse in improving surgical patients' clinical outcomes and satisfaction: Beyond medication. AORN Journal 104(6): S17–S22. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2016.10.013.

Chatchumni

Namvongprom

Eriksson

Mazaheri

(2016) Thai nurses' experiences of post-operative pain assessment and its' influence on pain management decisions. BMC Nursing 15(1): 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0136-8.

10.

Chou

Gordon

D. B.

de Leon-Casasola

O. A.

Rosenberg

J. M.

Bickler

Brennan

C. L.

(2016) Management of postoperative pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. The Journal of Pain 17(2): 131–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.

11.

Chow

K. M.

Chan

J. C. Y.

(2015) Pain knowledge and attitudes of nursing students: A literature review. Nurse Education Today 35(2): 366–372.

12.

Eccleston

(2011) Post-operative pain management. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10: 1–33.

13.

Eder

S. C.

Sloan

E. P.

Todd

(2003) Documentation of ED patient pain by nurses and physicians. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 21(4): 253–257. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(03)00041-X.

14.

Elshamy

Ramzy

(2011) The effect of postoperative pain assessment and management monitoring program on surgical nurses' documentation, knowledge, attitudes, and patients' satisfaction at Mansoura University Hospitals. Journal of American Science 7(10): 500–516.

15.

Ferrell, B. R., & McCaffery, M. (2012). Knowledge and attitudes survey regarding pain. Retrieved from http://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/knowldege__attitude_survey_10-12.pdf.

16.

Fletcher

Stamer

U. M.

Pogatzki-Zahn

Zaslansky

Tanase

N. V.

Perruchoud

Meissner

(2015) Chronic postsurgical pain in Europe: an observational study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 32(10): 725–734.

17.

Francis

Fitzpatrick

J. J.

(2013) Postoperative pain: Nurses' knowledge and patients' experiences. Pain Management Nursing 14(4): 351–357.

18.

Glowacki

(2015) Effective pain management and improvements in patients' outcomes and satisfaction. Critical Care Nurse 35(3): 33–41.

19.

Gustafsson

Borglin

(2013) Can a theory-based educational intervention change nurses' knowledge and attitudes concerning cancer pain management? A quasi-experimental design. BMC Health Services Research 13(1): 328.

20.

Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf-mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form-36 bodily pain scale (sf. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11): S240–S252.

21.

International Association for the Study of Pain. (2018). Missions and visions. Retrived from https://www.iasp-pain.org/Mission?navItemNumber=586.

22.

Israel, G. D. (1992, October). Sampling: The evidence of extension program impact (Program Evaluation and Organizational Development, PEOD-5). Gainesville: IFAS, University of Florida.

23.

Jones

(2012) Pain management for women in labour: An overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 5(2): 101–102.

24.

Kehlet

Jensen

T. S.

Woolf

C. J.

(2006) Persistent postoperative pain: Risk factors and prevention. The Lancet 367(9522): 1618–1625.

25.

Kizza

I. B.

Muliira

J. K.

Kohi

T. W.

Nabirye

R. C.

(2016) Nurses' knowledge of the principles of acute pain assessment in critically ill adult patients who are able to self-report. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences 4: 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2016.02.001.

26.

Kolvekar

Pilegaard

Ashley

Simon

Grant

(2016) Pain management using patient controlled anaesthesia in adults post Nuss procedure: An analysis with respect to patient satisfaction. The Journal of Visualized Surgery 2: 37.

27.

Koneti

K. K.

Jones

(2013) Management of acute pain. Surgery (Oxford) 31(2): 77–83.

28.

Lewthwaite

B. J.

Jabusch

K. M.

Wheeler

B. J.

Schnell-Hoehn

K. N.

Mills

Estrella-Holder

Fedorowicz

(2011) Nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management in hospitalized adults. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 42(6): 251–257. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20110103-03.

29.

Lorentzen

Hermansen

I. L.

Botti

(2012) A prospective analysis of pain experience, beliefs and attitudes, and pain management of a cohort of Danish surgical patients. European Journal of Pain 16(2): 278–288.

30.

Mackintosh

(2007) Assessment and management of patients with post-operative pain. Nursing Standard 22(5): 49–55.

31.

Macrae

W. A.

(2008) Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 Years on. British Journal of Anaesthesia 101(1): 77–86. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen099.

32.

Masigati

H. G.

Chilonga

K. S.

(2014) Postoperative pain management outcomes among adults treated at a tertiary hospital in Moshi, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research 16(1): 47–53.

33.

McCaffery

Pasero

Ferrell

B. R.

(2007) Nurses' decisions about opioid dose. The American Journal of Nursing 107(12): 35–39.

34.

McDaid

Maund

Rice

Wright

Jenkins

B. J.

Woolacott

(2010) Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of morphine-related side effects after major surgery: A systematic review. Health Technology Assessessment 14: 1–153. iii–iv.

35.

McDonald

D. D.

LaPorta

Meadows-Oliver

(2007) Nurses' response to pain communication from patients: A post-test experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44(1): 29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.017.

36.

Meissner

Coluzzi

Fletcher

Huygen

Morlion

Neugebauer

Pergolizzi

(2015) Improving the management of post-operative acute pain: priorities for change. Current Medical Research and Opinion 31(11): 2131–2143. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1092122.

37.

Miller, A. J. (2012). Hospice nurses-attitudes and knowledge about pain management. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4165.

38.

Murray

A. A.

Retief

F. W.

(2016) Acute postoperative pain in 1231 patients at a developing country referral hospital: Incidence and risk factors. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 22(1): 26–31. doi: 10.1080/22201181.2015.1115608.

39.

Narayan

M. C.

(2010) Culture's effects on pain assessment and management. American Journal of Nursing 110(4): 38–46.

40.

Pasero

(2009) Challenges in pain assessment. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 24(1): 50–54.

41.

Rafati

Soltaninejad

Aflatoonian

Mashayekhi

(2016) Postoperative pain: Management and documentation by Iranian nurses. Materia Socio Medica 28(1): 36–40. doi: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.36-40.

42.

Ruben

M. A.

van Osch

Blanch-Hartigan

(2015) Healthcare providers' accuracy in assessing patients' pain: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 98(10): 1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.009.

43.

Schreiber

J. A.

Cantrell

Moe

K. A.

Hench

McKinney

Lewis

C. P.

Brockopp

(2014) Improving knowledge, assessment, and attitudes related to pain management: Evaluation of an intervention. Pain Management Nursing 15(2): 474–481.

44.

Rozainiee

S. E.

(2009) Survey of nurses' knowledge and attitude regarding post operative pain management at a teaching hospital in Malaysia. Medicine & Health 4(41): 47–52.

45.

Subramanian

Allcock

James

Lathlean

(2012) Challenges faced by nurses in managing pain in a critical care setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing 21(9–10): 1254–1262.

46.

Turk

D. C.

Melzack

(2011) The measurement of pain and the assessment of people experiencing pain. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of Pain Assessment, New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, pp. 3–16.

47.

Twycross

(2007) Children's nurses' post-operative pain management practices: An observational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44(6): 869–881.

48.

White

P. F.

Kehlet

(2010) Improving postoperative pain management: What are the unresolved issues?. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 112(1): 220–225.

49.

World Health Organization. (2016). Health workforce – Nursing and midwifery. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/en/.

50.

Woldehaimanot

T. E.

Eshetie

T. C.

Kerie

M. W.

(2014) Postoperative pain management among surgically treated patients in an Ethiopian hospital. PLoS ONE 9(7): 1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102835.

51.

Yakusheva

Lindrooth

Weiss

(2014) Nurse value-added and patient outcomes in acute care. Health Services Research 49(6): 1767–1786. doi: 10.1111/14756773.12236.

52.

Yüceer

(2011) Nursing approaches in the postoperative pain management. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations 2(4): 474–478. doi: 10.5799/ahinjs.01.2011.04.0100.

Knowledge,Attitudes,and Practices of Postoperative Pain Management by Nurses in Selected District Hospitals in Ghana

Abstract

Introduction

Purpose

Methodology

Results

Conclusions

Recommendations

Keywords

Background

Literature Review

Methods

Research Design

Study Setting

Sample Size and Sampling Technique

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Instrument for Data Collection

Data Collection Procedure

Data Analysis

Ethical Considerations

Results

Demographic Data of Respondents

Knowledge of Nurses and Midwives on POP Management

Attitudes of Respondents Toward POP Management

Practices of Nurses on POP Management

Discussion

Conclusion

Implication of Study

Limitation of Study

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Authors' Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References