Abstract
Children with intellectual developmental disorders (IDDs) are frequent users of emergency department (ED) services. Incorporating parents’ experiences and addressing information gaps is crucial to supporting healthcare utilization. This study examined the experiences and information needs of parents managing their child with an IDD in the ED. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 10 parents; data was analyzed thematically. Results draw attention to the role of parents as key care coordinators and experts in their child's health, often advocating for the needs of their child. Facilitators to positive ED experiences were mutual respect and trust between parents and healthcare providers (HCPs), parental preparedness, and effective communication. Parents rely on each other and trusted sources of information when making decisions and seeking validation. Findings can aid researchers, HCP, families, and change-makers to gain insight into factors that drive parental expectations and care decisions within the ED. Findings can also be used to support the development of targeted knowledge translation strategies supporting both caregivers and HCPs in managing emergency healthcare of children with IDDs.
Introduction
Children with intellectual developmental disorders (IDDs) are typically defined as having conditions that can negatively affect the physical, intellectual and/or emotional trajectory of a child's development.1,2 IDDs can be grouped by the body system that is affected, such as a nervous system, sensory system, metabolic or degenerative disorder. 2 Many broad definitions also exist in the literature to describe IDDs, such as intellectual disability, global developmental delay, and neurodevelopmental disabilities.3,4
Children with an IDD use both inpatient and emergency department (ED) care at approximately 1.8 times that of the general population. 5 Additionally, Lindgren et al (2021) found that these children were over 7 times more likely to need ED care for epilepsy/convulsions and behavioral disorders compared to the general population. 5 Using data from 9.1 million ED visits across New York State, Beverly et al (2021) compared ED use between children and adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). 6 Results showed that those with ASD had a higher likelihood of ED visits and a greater prevalence of co-occurring conditions such as ADHD, IDD, and epilepsy. 6
As a high intensity environment, the ED poses sensory, behavioral and communication challenges. 7 Communication challenges can worsen in stimulating environments, leading to aggression, hyperactivity, self-injury, sensory sensitivity, and escape behaviors in children with IDDs.8–12 Crowded waiting rooms and long wait times continue to induce significant agitation and anxiety in individuals with an IDD.13,14
The experiences of caring for children with an IDD in the ED are recognized as complex and challenging for the patients, their caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCPs).7,15–17 Parents have identified negative experiences when seeking emergency care such as a lack of respect, anxiety, 18 and concerns of overmedication and diagnostic overshadowing. 19 Negative hospital experiences have also been reported due to HCPs lack of expertise and knowledge specific to managing children with an IDD as well as the unmet support needs of parents of a child with an IDD.19–21 Effective multidisciplinary programs address care disparities for individuals with IDDs, emphasizing the importance of caregiver experiences and information needs for quality patient management. 22
Persistent challenges in emergency healthcare and high utilization rates among children with IDDs highlight the importance of addressing the information needs and experiences of their parents and caregivers. Gaining a deeper understanding of how parents navigate the ED experience is essential. This qualitative study presents findings from interviews that explore the experiences and information needs of parents seeking ED care for children with IDDs.
Method
Study Design, Sample, and Setting
This exploratory study followed qualitative descriptive methodology. Using purposive sampling, participants across Canada were recruited between June 2023 and March 2024 via online support communities for families with children with IDD, posters in health clinics across [study city], and through social media platforms. This method allows for targeted recruitment of individuals with specific experiences. Purposive sampling does not support comparisons of patient populations, but is intentionally used to gain deep understandings of lived experiences. Eligible participants met the following criteria: (1) parent of a child under 18 years with an IDD, (2) reside in Canada, (3) sought care for their child with an IDD at a Canadian ED in the past 12 months, and (4) able to speak, read, and write English. Potential participants were provided a letter outlining the purpose of the study, screened for eligibility, and invited for an interview. Ethics approval was obtained from the [authors’ host institution].
Data Collection
An interview guide (Appendix A) was developed by the authors to explore parent experiences and information needs while seeking care for their child with an IDD in the ED. Semi-structured interviews23–25 were conducted over Zoom™ by a member of the research team. The team is composed of nursing and public health researchers with experience in child health, knowledge translation, and qualitative methodologies. The interviewer, a registered nurse and researcher, has over 35 years of professional experience in the Canadian pediatric healthcare system. All team members actively engaged in debriefings and reflexivity to ensure their professional lens did not overshadow the lived experiences emerging from the data. Informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to starting the interview. Demographic data was self-reported by each participant. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcriptionist. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently until data saturation, the point at which no new themes or concepts were identified.26,27
Data Analysis
Inductive experiential thematic analysis was used to identify themes directly from the data. This type of analysis emphasizes participants’ lived experiences and captures the richness of their personal stories to identify significant themes addressing the research question. 28 A comprehensive audit trail and research team debriefings were used to maintain confirmability and dependability. NVivo™ v14 qualitative analysis software was used for data management and to facilitate the organization and coding of interview transcripts.
Clarke and Braun's (2017) 6-step approach to thematic analysis was used to guide the process. 28 In phase 1, data immersion, potential themes were identified by reviewing the transcripts. In phase 2, coding, themes were discussed and a team member conducted open coding and organized codes into preliminary categories. In the third phase, generating initial themes, related categories were grouped into thematic headings. During phase 4, developing and reviewing themes, the team ensured themes aligned with the research question. Themes were then refined to reflect the parents’ overall narrative in phase 5 (refining, defining and naming themes). Finally, in phase 6, reporting, sample quotes were selected and theme names were finalized by all authors. Demographic data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics© v.29.
Results
Thirty participants were recruited from across Canada of which 10 met eligibility and completed interviews. All participants (n = 10) were female and living with another supportive adult (Table 1). Almost all participants (n = 9) were between the ages of 31–50 years and had a post-secondary degree or higher education. Seven participants (70%) identified as white and 6 (60%) reported annual household incomes > CAD $150,000. Participants predominantly lived in the inner city (60%, n = 6) or suburb (20%, n = 2). Half of participants (50%, n = 5) had visited an ED 1–5 times with their child. Each participant had 1 child with an IDD, and almost all children (80%, n = 8) had more than 1 health condition and had been admitted to the hospital as a result of their IDD. Children were 13 years or younger and of the 10 children, 6 had Down syndrome, presenting with various co-morbidities: ADHD and anxiety; congenital heart disease (CHD), epilepsy, hyper-secretory asthma, and adrenal insufficiency; pulmonary hypertension and atrial septal defect; atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and Crohn's disease; neurogenic bladder; and hypothyroidism. Among the other 4 children, diagnoses included ASD, Dravet syndrome, and XXY syndrome.
Demographic Characteristics of Parent Participants (n = 10).
Four key themes, each with multiple subthemes, emerged from the data (Figure 1). Themes are described below with examples of supporting quotes in Table 2.

Qualitative themes and subthemes.
Thematic Analysis and Supporting Quotes.
Parents Are Key Coordinators and Experts in Their Child's Health
Parents are essential partners in managing their child's health, particularly when dealing with frequent ED visits and complex health needs due to underlying causes and increased susceptibility to other conditions, which frequently occur alongside IDD. When deciding when to seek care in the ED, parents trusted their instincts, previous experiences, and knowledge of their child's symptom trajectory. Recognizing their child's symptoms and illness patterns is vital for effective crisis management. Parents described the significance of early intervention and efficient navigation of the healthcare system. Once in the ED, parents felt the need to advocate for the needs of their child, particularly for children who struggle to communicate effectively. They emphasized the need for HCPs to listen to parental knowledge related to their child and their child's atypical presentations, such as high pain tolerance levels. Parents also highlighted the challenges of single-parent situations, noting that having both parents present can improve communication with HCPs.
Parent Experiences in the ED Are Shaped by Prior Healthcare Encounters
Parents’ experiences in the ED are heavily influenced by their past interactions with healthcare. Building trust and respect with HCPs is essential; parents valued HCPs who genuinely listened to their concerns and recognized their expertise regarding their child's health. In turn, parents grew to trust HCPs and respect informed decision-making. Parents described feeling a lack of empathy by HCPs for parental emotional distress, and emphasized the importance of both self-compassion and receiving compassion from HCPs. Notably, experiences of privilege and discrimination were reported. Some parents felt they were taken more seriously due to their background, while others faced biases related to their ethnicity or immigrant status. Other traumatic experiences during ED visits included restraints used on children and inattention to their child's needs resulting in concerns for their child's health and safety.
Positive ED Experiences Are Influenced by Parental Preparedness, ED Processes, and Effective Communication
Positive experiences in the ED rely on parental preparedness, efficient processes, and effective communication. Parents proactively prepared for ED visits by maintaining detailed medical records and packing necessary items (eg medications, changes of clothes, tablets and chargers). Effective ED processes, including responsive triage and streamlined care, helped demonstrate consideration for the individual needs of children with IDD. Experiences were discussed positively when parents felt HCPs paid attention to their child's unique needs and when their child was seen promptly. Crucial to positive experiences was effective communication: when information, ideas, or feelings are conveyed in a way that allows the recipient to fully understand the intended message. Parents felt this occurred when HCPs actively listened to concerns, explained procedures to children at their level of understanding, and helped manage parent expectations. In contrast, negative experiences often stemmed from feeling dismissed or not taken seriously by HCPs, which led to a need for constant advocacy for their child's basic needs. These experiences were sometimes compounded by feelings of discrimination, lack of compassion, and the emotional trauma of seeing their child in distress.
Parental Information Needs Change Over Time
As parents become more experienced with the ED and their child's IDD, their information needs change. Parents faced challenges finding adequate support and information, necessitating them to learn to advocate for their child and independently seek resources. Parents often sought guidance from each other and trusted sources as issues arose. Online communities and fellow parents were described as invaluable sources, aiding in healthcare navigation and validating decision-making. Past experiences significantly shaped the type of information needed, with parents learning from previous healthcare encounters to trust their instincts when making decisions, and gaining an understanding of the supports available. In 1 example, a participant, frustrated by the lack of medical advice that missed informing them of a crucial Down syndrome-specific condition (neurogenic bladder), sought out expert, targeted information regarding the unique health needs of their child with Down syndrome. Over time, parents gained confidence and knowledge, often assuming greater responsibilities in their child's care, including learning medical procedures such as urinary catheterization and central line care.
Discussion
Parents’ experiences when seeking emergency care for their child with an IDD reveal expectations for care and highlight areas for improvement. As confirmed by existing research,7,29 key to a positive experience is the acknowledgement of parental expertise, along with dignity, respect, and collaboration from HCPs. Despite consistent research highlighting these needs, including findings dating back to 2016, there remains a significant gap between evidence and practice, with limited advancement toward meeting the unique challenges faced by these families. 7
Parents are essential partners in their child's health, serving as skilled advocates, system navigators, and providers of essential information related to their child's unique needs. Participants shared that their expertise and advocacy were crucial to positive outcomes in the ED. Experiences were deeply shaped by past healthcare interactions, trusting relationships, compassion, and the potential impact of trauma and discrimination. Participants felt that effective care for children with an IDD requires parental expertise to be acknowledged and valued. While the ED is an acute care environment, findings underscore a gap between parental expectations for comprehensive, person-centered care and the practical limitations of emergency medicine. Person-centered care, characterized by compassion and understanding, is vital for building trust and ensuring dignified, personalized care, particularly for children with IDDs. 17
Effective communication collectively fostered positive and less stressful ED experiences for parents and children. Parents’ urged HCPs to actively listen, individualize care, and educate themselves on the unique symptom presentations of children with IDDs and children from ethnically diverse backgrounds. One parent's statement illustrates how a lack of validation and empathy in communication can be traumatic: “I actually told the doctor that like next time if you ever see a mom who's actually waiting here and its 3 am in the morning, I beg you not to tell them that this is progression of the disease when you couldn’t quite know about it.” (006).
Positive ED experiences were further shaped by parental preparedness through mental and physical readiness for the visit. As 1 participant stated, “I go prepared to advocate for her […] that itself takes so much of energy when you have to care for a child with complex needs.” Similar to other research, parents of children with ASD advocate for proactive preparation including bringing distractions. 7 Prolonged wait times and a lack of preparedness can significantly contribute to parental stress and negative experiences 29 which can create barriers to future care and lead to delays in seeking necessary medical attention.30,31
Parent's information needs are dynamic and evolve with their experience. Families desire but often lack consistent information about ED services. As parents develop specialized health management skills, they desire earlier access to relevant information and greatly value peer support. 32 As parents gain knowledge of their child's needs and navigate various healthcare settings, they become more effective in managing their child's care. To enhance the ED experience, HCPs must adapt communication and support to foster informed parental involvement in healthcare decisions. 33
Study findings highlight persistent inequalities and challenges in how parents experience various aspects of healthcare. Although not a focus of this study, research has demonstrated that parental health literacy also impacts the information needs of parents and their management of children with an IDD. 32 Low caregiver health literacy, affects nearly half of those in Canadian pediatric EDs, increases the odds of non-urgent ED visits by 1.5 times. 34 Challenges faced by parents include navigating the ED, accessing resources for informed decision-making, and traumatic experiences in the ED. Addressing varying health literacy levels is crucial and requires implementing strategies such as universal health literacy precautions, language accommodations, interactive education, and easily accessible materials. 35
In this study, findings highlight the need for systemic changes to improve care for children with an IDD. Parents urge HCPs to actively listen, address the individual child's needs, and educate themselves on variations in symptom presentation across children with an IDD and children from ethnically diverse backgrounds. As experts on their children's needs, behaviors, and triggers, parents provide valuable insight to shape effective communication and care strategies.14,36 Positive experiences are tied to respect for parental knowledge, clear communication and proactive preparation.7,17,29,37
Past improvements in the ED environment including management approaches such as sensory equipment kits and clinical pathways show a path forward. 29 Pediatric EDs, with their specialized staff and child-centered environments, are better positioned to provide a more positive and tailored experience for these children and families. They can provide tailored care for children with intellectual disabilities through specifically trained staff and family-centered practices, leading to higher parental trust and better communication compared to general EDs. 38 By prioritizing parental preparedness, optimizing ED processes and their management of complex concomitant conditions, and addressing evolving information needs, care quality can be enhanced and negative experiences for parents, children, and HCPs can be limited.
Limitations
True to qualitative inquiry, the 10 participants were purposively sampled with data collection and analysis occurring iteratively. It is important to note that the aim of qualitative research is not generalizability, rather it is transferability, which is achieved through providing rich, contextualized understanding and allowing the reader to determine if the findings apply to their own context. While a sample size of 10 may be viewed as a limitation in quantitative studies, it is not a limitation in this study as data saturation was achieved.
This study did not aim to investigate whether experiences differed between pediatric and general ED settings, nor did it evaluate how the age of the child or reason for seeking ED care impacted parent experiences. Further research specifically focused on comparisons of these experiences would be valuable to inform practice. There was no evaluation of how the age of the child or the reason for seeking ED care impacted parent experiences and information needs. Future research could differentiate findings based upon the type of ED a child attends, reasons for presenting, sociodemographic characteristics, and length of stay as these contexts could provide additional insights that would benefit health systems and practitioners to support steps in addressing healthcare disparities for children with IDDs. Lastly, while the experiential thematic analysis relies on subjective interpretation, it effectively provided an in-depth understanding of participants’ experiences.
Conclusion
This study reinforces existing literature and offers preliminary insight into the complex experiences and information needs of parents with children with an IDD seeking care in the ED. Findings provide rich, detailed insights and understandings of self-reported experiences, perceptions, and information needs and support the importance of understanding drivers of parents’ expectations and decisions in ED. Findings also highlight that parents of children with IDDs often experience disappointment and frustration with ED care practices and the inadequacy of resources to support their child. This calls attention to the vital need for additional supports and continued collaboration between HCPs and families to improve the quality of patient- and family-centered care for children with IDDs in the ED. While limited in generalizability, findings from this study can aid researchers, HCPs, families, and change-makers in gaining insight into factors driving parental expectations and care decisions within the ED, and can be used to inform the development of future research and targeted knowledge translation strategies supporting both caregivers and providers in managing the care of children with IDDs.
Footnotes
Consent for Publication
Not applicable as all data is anonymized.
Consent to Participate
Participants provided written consent for review and signature before starting interviews. Each participant consented to participate by signing, in writing, a study information letter with a consent form. Verbal consent was also provided by each participant at the start of each qualitative interview.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to participant confidentiality, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethical Considerations
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was conducted with ethics approval from the Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta on June 21, 2023. Ethics ID: Pro00062904.
Funding
This research has been funded by the generous support of the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation through the Women and Children's Health Research Institute. Dr Scott is a Distinguished Researcher, Stollery Science Lab. Dr Hartling is a Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis and Translation and a Distinguished Researcher, Stollery Science Lab.
