This Perspectives on Pedagogy acknowledges ongoing inequities in public health teaching and learning and describes the importance of implementing equity-focused teaching (EFT) approaches to serve present and future diverse public health student populations. Current equity-focused pedagogies being implemented within the field of public health are described, along with current limitations among public health instructors surrounding EFT training. We conclude with an example, offering recommendations to instructors on how to create transparently-designed writing assignments to support equitable learning in public health.
AqilA. R.MalikM.JacquesK. A.LeeK.ParkerL. J.KennedyC. E.MooneyG.GermanD. (2021). Engaging in anti-oppressive public health teaching: Challenges and recommendations. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 7(4), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799211045407
4.
AugustEZelnerSZelnerJAndersonOS. (2023). Developing Public Health Students’ Strategic Skills Through Authorship Training. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 9(2), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799221137049
BundickM. J.QuagliaR. J.CorsoM. J.HaywoodD. E. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600411
7.
Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, (2022). Equity-focused teaching [Education]. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT). https://crlt.umich.edu/equity-focused-teaching
8.
CologonK.LassigC. (2020). Universal approaches to curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. In GrahamL. (Ed.), Inclusive education for the 21st century: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 179–207). Allen & Unwin. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/180803/
9.
DovidioJ. F.FiskeS. T. (2012). Under the radar: How unexamined biases in decision-making processes in clinical interactions can contribute to health care disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 945–952. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300601
Evans-WintersV. E. (2017). Necropolitics and education. In SirrakosG.EmdinC. (Eds.), Between the world and the urban classroom (pp. 19–33). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-032-5_2
12.
FlemingP. J. (2020). The importance of teaching history of inequities in public health programs. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 6(4), 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920915228
13.
HagopianA.WestK. M.OrnelasI. J.HartA. N.HagedornJ.SpignerC. (2018). Adopting an anti-racism public health curriculum competency: The University of Washington Experience. Public Health Reports, 133(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918774791
HuiJ. S.SprouseM. (2023). Lettersmith: Scaffolding written professional communication among college students. 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
IvesJ.Castillo-MontoyaM. (2020). First-generation college students as academic learners: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319899707
18.
KurfissJ. G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1988. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Dept. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED304041
19.
LugerM.StensrudC. (2022). Speaking against inequity in the writing classroom: Challenging the performance paradigm for undergraduate oral presentations. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32, 335–355. https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.939
20.
MackenzieS. L. C. (2018). Writing for public health: Strategies for teaching writing in a school or program of public health. Public Health Reports, 133(5), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918785374
21.
MarshallC.BakalM.DeardorffJ.PiesC.LuM. C. (2022). Developing an anti-racist foundations course in MCH for MPH students. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 26(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03285-2
22.
NielsenK. (2014). On class, race and dynamics of privilege: Supporting generation 1.5 writers across the curriculum. WAC and Second-Language Writers: Research Towards Linguistically and Culturally Inclusive Programs and Practices, 129–149.
23.
OgbuJ. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Routledge.
PeoplesW. A.FlemingP. J.CrearyM. S. (2023). Working toward health equity requires antiracist teaching. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 64(4), 604–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.023
26.
QuitadamoI. J.KurtzM. J. (2007). Learning to improve: Using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology. CBE— Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203
27.
RyanT.HendersonM. (2018). Feeling feedback: Students’ emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456
28.
TILT. (2014). TILT higher Ed: Transparency in learning and teaching [Education]. TILT Higher Education. https://tilthighered.com/
29.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
30.
WigginsG.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design, expanded (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31.
WinkelmesM.-A.BernackiM.ButlerJ.ZochowskiM.GolanicsJ.WeavilK. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1–2), 31–37.
32.
WinkelmesM.-A.BoyeA.TappS. (2019). Transparent design in higher education teaching and leadership: A guide to implementing the transparency framework institution-wide to improve learning and retention. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
33.
ZamoraA. N.AugustE.AndersonO. S. (2023). Implementation of lettersmith to improve the writing process among graduate-level public health students: Results from a pilot evaluation study. Educational Technology Research and Development (Under Review).
