The coronavirus pandemic has caused many colleges and universities throughout the United States to pivot from in-person teaching to distance-based instruction, and while this form of education offers many advantages, one challenge facing institutions of higher education is how to best prepare their students for success in the online environment. This article describes the approach used by a hybrid executive Master of Public Health (MPH) program to orient its students, who are all working professionals, to the online environment. In addition to a description of the online orientation course, quantitative and qualitative evaluation findings are shared. The article includes recommendations for establishing an online orientation program. Although the orientation described was developed for working professionals earning an MPH degree, the approach can be applied or adapted to other online programs as they face the need to prepare students for online delivery, whether during a time of emergency like the coronavirus pandemic or during a period of natural programmatic growth.
AbdousM. (2019). Well begun is half done: Using online orientation to foster online students’ academic self-efficacy. Online Learning, 23(3), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1437
2.
AliR.LeedsE. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4).
3.
BawaP. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions: A literature review. SAGE Open, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
4.
BellantuonoL. A. (2020). Supporting the online student: From suspect to graduate (alumni). In VivoloJ. (Ed.), Managing online learning: The life-cycle of successful programs (pp. 59–69). Routledge.
5.
BozarthJ.ChapmanD. D.LaMonicaL. (2004). Preparing for distance learning: Designing an online student orientation course. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 87–106.
6.
BrewerS. A.Yucedag-OzcanA. (2013). Educational persistence: Self-efficacy and topics in a college orientation course. Journal of College Student Retention, 14(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.14.4.b
7.
CaruthG.D.CaruthD.L. (2013). Distance education in the United States: From correspondence courses to the Internet. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 141–149.
ChoM.-H.HeronM. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
KanukaH.JugdevK. (2006) Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning: Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, (21)2, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510600715578
LiuJ. C. (2019). Evaluating online learning orientation design with a readiness scale. Online Learning, 23(4), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2078
16.
McGowanV. F. (2018). An investigation into web-based presentations of institutional online learning orientations. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1186017.pdf
17.
MooreM. G. (2003). From Chautauqua to the virtual university: A century of distance education in the United States. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED482357
18.
MorrisL. V.FinneganC. L. (2008). Best practices in predicting and encouraging student persistence and achievement online. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.e
19.
MotteramG.ForresterG. (2005). Becoming an online distance learner: What can be learned from students’ experiences of induction to distance programmes?Distance Education, 26(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291330
20.
NashR. D. (2005). Course completion rates among distance learners: Identifying possible methods to improve retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/nash84.htm
21.
PiccianoA. G. (2017). Online education policy and practice: The past, present, and future of the digital university. Routledge.
22.
Russo-GleicherR. J. (2014). Improving student retention in online college classes: Qualitative insights from faculty. Journal of College Student Retention, 16(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.16.2.e
23.
ScagnoliN. I. (2001). Student orientation for online programs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 19–27. https://core.ac.uk/reader/29157500
TaylorJ. M.DunnM.WinnS. K. (2015). Innovative orientation leads to improved success in online courses. Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.570
26.
VivoloJ. (2020). Overview of online learning and an (un)official history. In VivoloJ. (Ed.). Managing online learning: The life-cycle of successful programs (pp. 7–17). Routledge.
27.
WedemeyerC. A.NajemC. (1969). AIM: From concept to reality. The Articulated Instructional Media program at Wisconsin. Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.
WozniakH.MahonyM. J.PizzicaJ.KouliasM. (2007). How do students “get learning”? Unexpectedly diverse pathways in an activity based, online orientation site. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/singapore07/procs/wozniak.pdf
