This paper examines the relationship between affirmative action bans and racial attitudes, with a particular focus on state-level actions, such as California's Proposition 209 and recent Supreme Court rulings, including Students for Fair Admissions v.Harvard (2023). These legal and political shifts have reshaped the racial landscape in higher education, particularly affecting underrepresented minority (URM) populations. Drawing on psychological and sociological frameworks, this paper elaborates on the relationships among implicit bias, racial inequality, institutional structures, and race-specific social policies such as affirmative action. Novel interdisciplinary approaches consider historical, economic, socio-psychological, and structural factors. Gaps in existing research specify the need for a more comprehensive link between individual micro-level psychological processes and macro-level policies and structures. By addressing these gaps, the paper aims to contribute to the broader conversation on the consequences of affirmative action bans and propose pathways for future research incorporating implicit racial attitudes and education policy.
AcharyaA.BlackwellM.SenM. (2016). The political legacy of American slavery. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 621–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/686631
2.
AlonS. (2015). Race, class, and affirmative action. Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
ArcidiaconoP.AucejoE.CoateP.HotzV. J. (2014). Affirmative action and university fit: Evidence from proposition 209. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-8997-3-7
4.
ArcidiaconoP.AucejoE. M.HotzV. J. (2016). University differences in the graduation of minorities in STEM fields: Evidence from California. American Economic Review, 106(3), 525–562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130626
5.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2016). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Bantam.
6.
BélandD.CampbellA. L.WeaverR. K. (2022). Policy feedback: How policies shape politics. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BellS. B.FarrR.OfosuE.HehmanE.DeWallC. N. (2023). Implicit bias predicts less willingness and less frequent adoption of black children more than explicit bias. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 163(4), 554–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1975619
8.
BerreyE. (2015). The enigma of diversity: The language of race and the limits of racial justice. University of Chicago Press.
9.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are emily and greg more employable than lakisha and jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
10.
BleemerZ. (2020). Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility After California's Proposition 209. Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education Research & Occasional Paper Series, CSHE.10.2020.
BoboL. (1998). Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action: Unanswered questions and new directions. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 985–1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764298041007009
13.
California Proposition 209. (1996). California Constitution, Article I, & 31.
14.
CardD.KruegerA. B. (2005). Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants? Evidence from California and Texas. ILR Review, 58(3), 416–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390505800306
15.
CharlesworthT. E.BanajiM. R. (2019). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: I. Long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016. Psychological Science, 30(2), 174–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618813087
16.
CharlesworthT. E.BanajiM. R. (2022). Evidence of covariation between regional implicit bias and socially significant outcomes in healthcare, education, and law enforcement. In Handbook on economics of discrimination and affirmative action (pp. 1–21). Springer.
17.
CharlesworthT. E.NavonM.RabinovichY.LofaroN.KurdiB. (2023). The project implicit international dataset: Measuring implicit and explicit social group attitudes and stereotypes across 34 countries (2009–2019). Behavior Research Methods, 55(3), 1413–1440. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01851-2
18.
ChettyR.HendrenN.JonesM. R.PorterS. R. (2020). Race and economic opportunity in the United States: An intergenerational perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 711–783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz042
19.
ChinM. J.QuinnD. M.DhaliwalT. K.LovisonV. S. (2020). Bias in the air: A nationwide exploration of teachers’ implicit racial attitudes, aggregate bias, and student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 566–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20937240
ConnerlyW.ConnelyW. (2000). Creating equal: My fight against race preferences. Encounter Books San Francisco.
22.
ConnorP.EversE. R. (2020). The bias of individuals (in crowds): Why implicit bias is probably a noisily measured individual-level construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1329–1345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620931492
23.
Fisher v. (2016). University of Texas, 579 US ___ .
24.
GalvanM. J.PayneB. K. (2024). Implicit bias as a cognitive manifestation of systemic racism. Dædalus, 153(1), 106–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_02051
25.
GreenA. R.CarneyD. R.PallinD. J.NgoL. H.RaymondK. L.IezzoniL. I.BanajiM. R. (2007). Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. Journal Of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1231–1238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5
26.
GreenwaldA. G.BrendlM.CaiH.CvencekD.DovidioJ. F.FrieseM.HughesS. (2022). Best research practices for using the implicit association test. Behavior Research Methods, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3
27.
Grutter v. (2003). Bollinger 539 US 306.
28.
HallW. J.ChapmanM. V.LeeK. M.MerinoY. M.ThomasT. W.PayneB. K.Coyne-BeasleyT. (2015). Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal Of Public Health, 105(12), e60–e76. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903
29.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
30.
HolcombeE. M.KezarA. (2024). Considerations and Challenges of Implementing Shared Equity Leadership (Research Dialogue, Issue.
31.
JohnsonR. M.NuñezR. A.KwonJ.DuranG. (2024). Under Siege: Campus Racial Climates in Texas Higher Education Amid Anit-DEI Legistlation.
32.
KarabelJ. (2006). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
33.
KidderW. C. (2016). How workable are class-based and race neutral alternatives at leading American universities. UCLA L. Rev. Discourse, 64, 99. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2836299
34.
KidderW. C.GándaraP. (2016). Two decades after the affirmative action ban: Evaluating the University of California’s race-neutral efforts.
35.
KriegerN.ChenJ. T.CoullB. A.BeckfieldJ.KiangM. V.WatermanP. D. (2014). Jim crow and premature mortality among the US black and white population, 1960–2009: An age–period–cohort analysis. Epidemiology, 25(4), 494–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000104
36.
KuklinskiJ. H.SnidermanP. M.KnightK.PiazzaT.TetlockP. E.LawrenceG. R.MellersB. (1997). Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal Of Political Science, 41, 402–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2111770
37.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
38.
LongM. C. (2004). Race and college admissions: An alternative to affirmative action?Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 1020–1033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125211
39.
LongM. (2016). The promise and peril for universities using correlates of race in admissions in response to the Grutter and Fisher decisions.
40.
LongM. C.BatemanN. A. (2020). Long-Run changes in underrepresentation after affirmative action bans in public universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 188–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720904433
41.
Mickey-PabelloD. (2023a). The Affirmative Action Avalanche: The Rise of Underrepresented Minority Enrollment at For-Profit Institutions. Sociology of Education.
42.
Mickey-PabelloD. (2023b). A STEM Penalty from Affirmative Action Bans?Research in Higher Education.
43.
Mickey-PabelloD.GarcesL. M. (2018). Addressing racial health inequities: Understanding the impact of affirmative action bans on applications and admissions in medical schools. American Journal of Education, 125(1), 79–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/699813
44.
MorehouseK. N.BanajiM. R. (2024). The science of implicit race bias: Evidence from the implicit association test. Dædalus, 153(1), 21–50.
45.
OkechukwuA. (2019). To fulfill these rights: Political struggle over affirmative action and open admissions. Columbia University Press.
46.
OrchardJ.PriceJ. (2017). County-level racial prejudice and the black-white gap in infant health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 181, 191–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.036
47.
OrfieldG. (2001). Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action. ERIC.
48.
OrfieldG.MarinP.FloresS. M.GarcesL. M. (2007). Charting the future of college affirmative action: Legal victories, continuing attacks, and new research.
49.
OrfieldG.MarinP.HornC. L. (2005). Higher Education and the Color Line: College Access, Racial Equity, and Social Change. ERIC.
50.
OrfieldG.MillerE. (1998). Chilling Admissions: The Affirmative Action Crisis and the Search for Alternatives. ERIC.
51.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal Of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
52.
PagerD.ShepherdH. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annu. Rev. Sociol, 34, 181–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740
53.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.Brown-IannuzziJ. L. (2019). Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(24), 11693–11698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818816116
54.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.LundbergK. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568
55.
PayneB. K.VuletichH.LundbergK. B. (2022). Critique of the bias-of-crowds model simply restates the model: Reply to connor and evers (2020). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 606–610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621997394
56.
PedotaJ.GarcesL. M.EpsteinE. M. B.NgaosiN. C.KhalaylehN. (2025). We’re on our own out here”: Faculty member responses to legislative threats to academic freedom and scholarship on race. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2025.2461986
57.
QuillianL.PagerD.HexelO.MidtbøenA. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(41), 10870–10875. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706255114
58.
ReardonS. F.BakerR.KasmanM.KlasikD.TownsendJ. B. (2017). Can socioeconomic status substitute for race in affirmative action college admissions policies? Evidence from a simulation model.
59.
Regents of the University of California v. (1978). Bakke, 438 U.S. 265.
60.
RiddleT.SinclairS. (2019). Racial disparities in school-based disciplinary actions are associated with county-level rates of racial bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(17), 8255–8260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808307116
61.
SanderR. H. (2004). A systemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stan. L. Rev., 57, 367.
62.
SanderR.TaylorS.Jr (2012). Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It S Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won T Admit It. Basic Books (AZ).
63.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.BoboL. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 70(3), 476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
64.
SowellT. (1978). Are quotas good for blacks?Commentary (new York, N Y ), 65(6), 39.
65.
SowellT. (1994). Race and culture: A world view. Basic Books.
66.
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, (Supreme Court of the United States 2023).
67.
StulbergL. M.ChenA. S. (2014). The origins of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate admissions: A comparative analysis of institutional change in higher education. Sociology of Education, 87(1), 36–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040713514063
68.
ThernstromS. (1994). The black-white student mismatch problem in university admissions. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, (6), 62–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2962467
69.
ThernstromS.ThernstromA. (1998). Reflections on the Shape of the River. HeinOnline.
70.
ThomasM. D.MichaelsE. K.Darling-HammondS.NguyenT. T.GlymourM. M.VittinghoffE. (2020). Whites’ county-level racial bias, COVID-19 rates, and racial inequities in the United States. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 17(22), 8695. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228695
71.
Waller-BeyA. (2025). Is it worth it? Truama Narratives in College Admissions Essays. Dissertation. In.
72.
WarikooN. K. (2016). The diversity bargain: And other dilemmas of race, admissions, and meritocracy at elite universities. University of Chicago press.
73.
WarikooN. (2022). Is Affirmative Action Fair?: The Myth of Equity in College Admissions. John Wiley & Sons.
74.
WarikooN. (2025). The Demise of Affirmative Action in College Admissions. Annual Review Of Sociology, 51.
75.
WilliamsJ. (2022). Historical lynchings and the contemporary voting behavior of blacks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(3), 224–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20190549
