As colleges and universities expand the socioeconomic diversity of their student populations, many policies and practices require reconceptualization to better serve all students. Recent social psychology and learning sciences research directly informs how to support the achievement and well-being of students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds, with attention to intersecting minoritized identities. These approaches challenge assimilationist and deficit-based views of student identities in addressing factors at multiple levels of their sociocultural contexts. Building from the evidence, recommendations emphasize committing financial resources to allow for full access and participation in higher education. Also, specific faculty practices and development opportunities can enhance teaching. Finally, community emerges as a central theme; recommendations enhance student connections within and beyond the college environment.
AutinF.BatruchA.ButeraF. (2019). The function of selection of assessment leads evaluators to artificially create the social class achievement gap. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 717–735.
2.
BangM.WarrenB.RoseberyA. S.MedinD. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.
3.
BrodyG. H.YuT.ChenE.MillerG. E.KoganS. M.BeachS. R. H. (2013). Is resilience only skin deep? Rural African Americans’ socioeconomic status–related risk and competence in preadolescence and psychological adjustment and allostatic load at age 19. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1285–1293.
4.
BrowmanA. S.DestinM. (2016). The effects of a warm or chilly climate towards socioeconomic diversity on academic motivation and self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(2), 172–187.
5.
BrowmanA. S.DestinMMieleD. B. (invited revision). The rich and the rest: Extreme economic inequality weakens Americans’ belief in socioeconomic mobility. Asian Journal of Social Psychology.
6.
BrowmanA. S.DestinM.CarswellK. L.SvobodaR. C. (2017). Perceptions of socioeconomic mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 45–52.
7.
BrowmanA. S.SvobodaR. C.DestinM. (2019). A belief in socioeconomic mobility promotes the development of academically motivating identities among low-socioeconomic status youth. Self and Identity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1664624
8.
CovarrubiasR.FrybergS. A. (2015). Movin’on up (to college): First-generation college students’ experiences with family achievement guilt. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(3), 420–429.
9.
CovarrubiasR.HerrmannS. D.FrybergS. A. (2016). Affirming the interdependent self: Implications for latino student performance. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 38(1), 47–57.
10.
CovarrubiasR.LandaI.GallimoreR. (2020). Developing a family achievement guilt scale grounded in first-generation college student voices. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1553–1566.
11.
DavidaiS. (2018). Why do Americans believe in economic mobility? Economic inequality, external attributions of wealth and poverty, and the belief in economic mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 138–148.
12.
DestinM. (2017). An open path to the future: Perceived financial resources and school motivation. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(7), 1004–1031.
13.
DestinM. (2019). Socioeconomic mobility, identity, and health: Experiences that influence immunology and implications for intervention. American Psychologist, 74(2), 207–217.
14.
DestinM. (2020). The double-edged consequences of beliefs about opportunity and economic mobility. The Future of Children, 30(1), 153–163.
15.
DestinM.DebrosseR. (2017). Upward social mobility and identity. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 99–104.
16.
DestinM.OysermanD. (2009). From assets to school outcomes: How finances shape children’s perceived possibilities and intentions. Psychological Science, 20(4), 414–418.
17.
DestinM.OysermanD. (2010). Incentivizing education: Seeing schoolwork as an investment, not a chore. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 846–849.
18.
DestinM.Rheinschmidt-SameM. L.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Status-based identity: A conceptual framework integrating the social psychological study of socioeconomic status and identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 270–289.
19.
DestinM.Rheinschmidt-SameM. L.RichesonJ. A. (2019). Implications of intersecting socioeconomic and racial-ethnic identities for academic achievement and well-being. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 57, 149–167.
20.
DestinM.SvobodaR. C. (2018). Costs on the mind: The influence of the financial burden of college on academic performance and cognitive functioning. Research in Higher Education, 59(3), 302–324.
21.
ElliottW.LewisM. K. (2015). The real college debt crisis: How student borrowing threatens financial well-being and erodes the American dream. Praeger.
22.
FryR.CilluffoA. (2019). A rising share of undergraduates are from poor families, especially at less selective colleges. Pew Research Center.
23.
Goldrick-RabS. (2016). Paying the price: College costs, financial aid, and the betrayal of the American dream. University of Chicago Press.
24.
GutiérrezK. D.HunterJ. D.ArzubiagaA. (2009). Re-mediating the university: Learning through sociocritical literacies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 1–23.
25.
GutiérrezK. D.JaramilloN. E. (2006). Looking for educational equity: The consequences of relying on Brown. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 173–189.
26.
HernandezI. A.SilvermanD. M.DestinM. (2021). From deficit to benefit: Highlighting lower-SES students’ background-specific strengths increases their academic persistence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104080
27.
JamesS. A.StrogatzD. S.WingS. B.RamseyD. L. (1987). Socioeconomic status, John Henryism, and hypertension in blacks and whites. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126(4), 664–673.
28.
KeelsM.DurkeeM.HopeE. (2017). The psychological and academic costs of school-based racial and ethnic microaggressions. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1316–1344.
29.
LedgerwoodA.MandisodzaA. N.JostJ. T.PohlM. J. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 29(3), 322–340.
30.
LuiP. P.QuezadaL. (2019). Associations between microaggression and adjustment outcomes: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 45–78.
31.
MaJ.PenderM.WelchM. (2019). Education pays 2019 (Trends in Higher Education). College Board.
32.
MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2017). Ideology and the maintenance of group inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 582–592.
33.
NadalK. L.WongY.GriffinK. E.DavidoffK.SrikenJ. (2014). The adverse impact of racial microaggressions on college students’ self-esteem. Journal of College Student Development, 55(5), 461–474.
34.
NasirN. S.RoseberyA. S.WarrenB.LeeC. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge University Press.
35.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). The promise of adolescence: Realizing opportunity for all youth. National Academy of Sciences.
36.
RichesonJ. A.NussbaumR. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 417–423.
37.
RogersL. O.RosarioR. J.CieltoJ. (2020). Perspectives on identity-relevant pathways to learning among youth of color: A review of research on the role of stereotypes. In NasirN. S.LeeC.PeaR.McKinneyM.Roystonde (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 62–78). Routledge.
38.
SilvermanD. M.HernandezI. A.DestinM. (under review). Educators’ beliefs about students’ socioeconomic backgrounds as an avenue for supporting motivation.
39.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
40.
StephensN. M.FrybergS. A.MarkusH. R.JohnsonC. S.CovarrubiasR. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.
41.
StephensN. M.HamedaniM.DestinM. (2014). Navigating the social class divide: A diversity education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943–953.
42.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.PhillipsL. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611–634.
43.
StephensN. M.TownsendS. S.HamedaniM. G.DestinM.ManzoV. (2015). A difference-education intervention equips first-generation college students to thrive in the face of stressful college situations. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1556–1566.
44.
Suárez-OrozcoC.CasanovaS.MartinM.KatsiaficasD.CuellarV.SmithN. A.DiasS. I. (2015). Toxic rain in class: Classroom interpersonal microaggressions. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 151–160.
45.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M.TorinoG. C.BucceriJ. M.HolderA.NadalK. L.EsquilinM. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286.
46.
Tintiangco-CubalesA.Duncan-AndradeJ. (in press). Still fighting for ethnic studies: The origins, practices, and potential of community responsive pedagogy. Teachers College Record.
47.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
48.
TorresL.DriscollM. W.BurrowA. L. (2010). Racial microaggressions and psychological functioning among highly achieving African-Americans: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(10), 1074–1099.
49.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), Article 1.
50.
VossoughiS.NzingaK.BerryA.IrvineF.MayorgaC.GashawM. (accepted). Writing as a social act: The feedback relation as a context for political ethical becoming. Research in the Teaching of English.
51.
WarrenB.VossoughiS.RoseberryA.BangM.TaylorE. (2020). Disciplinary learning and epistemic heterogeneity. In NasirN. S.LeeC. D.McKinneyM.Roystonde (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 277–293). Routledge.
52.
WatkinsN. L.LaBarrieT. L.AppioL. M. (2010). Black undergraduates’ experience with perceived racial microagressions in predominantly White colleges and universities. In SueD. W. (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact (pp. 25–58). John Wiley.
