This article discusses a 6 week research project that took place in a sixth grade U.S. history classroom in the Southeast. For 6 weeks, sixth graders explored pivotal issues throughout U.S. history connected to voting rights issues for African Americans. First, they examined the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments and the creation of literacy tests in the South. Next, students explored how Bloody Sunday played an instrumental role in leading to the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Then, the focus of the project shifted to the Supreme Court verdict of Shelby versus Holder that weakened the protections for minorities’ voting rights. Next, the students analyzed voting restriction laws in Georgia after the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Finally, our project closed with students examining the recent potential legislation by Congress: The Freedom to Vote Act. The summative assessment for our study asked students to write an essay on whether they supported or opposed the Freedom to Vote Act. All of the activities over the course of the 6 week project were designed to develop students’ political thinking skills as they analyzed the impact public policies with legislation passed by Congress could have on African Americans’ voting rights.
AndersonL.KrathwohlD. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
BarrR. D.BarthJ. L.ShermisS. S. (1977). Defining the social studies [Bulletin 51]. NCSS.
5.
BenassiV.OversonC.HakalaC. (Eds.). (2014). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. American Psychological Association.
6.
BickfordJ.ClaboughJ. (2019). Using the C3 Framework to examine the KKK’s racist rhetoric—Past and present—To strengthen our pluralist democracy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 14(1), 122–134.
CaroR. (2002). The master of the Senate: The years of Lyndon Johnson. Random House.
9.
CarterD. (2000). The politics of rage: George Wallace, the origins of the new conservatism, and the transformation of American politics (2nd ed.). Louisiana State University Press.
10.
ChenJ. A.StoddardJ. (2020). A virtual internship to prepare high school students for civic and political action. Educational Technology Research, 68(6), 3449–3470.
11.
ClaboughJ. (2018). Analyzing Richard Nixon’s “political death and resurrection” to strengthen students’ civic thinking skills. The Social Studies, 109(4), 177–185.
12.
CookR.YoderP. J. (2019). Finding Dewey and the C3 Framework: Lessons from a government unit on local history. The Oregon Journal of the Social Studies, 7(2), 55–62.
13.
DinklemanT.CuencaA. (2017). Qualitative inquiry in social studies research. In ManfraM. M.BolickC. M. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 95–131). John Wiley and Sons.
14.
DoolittleP. E.HicksD. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31(1), 72–104.
15.
EngleS. H. (1960). Decision making: The heart of social studies instruction. Social Education, 24(7), 301–306.
16.
EngleS. H.OchoaA. S. (1988). Education for democratic citizenship: Decision making in the social studies. Teachers College Press.
17.
EvansR. W. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?Teachers College Press.
18.
EvansR. W.NewmannF.SaxeD. W. (1996). Defining issues centered education. In EvansR.SaxeD. W. (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (1st ed., pp. 2–5). NCSS.
19.
FentonE. (1966). Teaching the New Social Studies in secondary schools: An inductive approach. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
20.
FentonE. (1967). The new social studies. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
21.
GablerN. (2022). Against the wind: Edward Kennedy and the rise of conservatism, 1976–2009. Crown.
22.
GouldL. L. (2005). The most exclusive club: A history of the modern United States Senate. Basic Books.
23.
GrantS. G. (2013). From Inquiry Arc to instructional practice: The potential of the C3 Framework. Social Education, 77(6), 322–326, 351.
24.
HalperinM.HeilemannJ. (2013). Double down: Game change 2012. Penguin Press.
25.
HarshmanJ.DarbyL. (2018). The Lemme history detectives: Researching rights, race, and activism within local history. In ClaboughJ.LintnerT. (Eds.), No reluctant citizens: Teaching civics in K-12 classrooms (pp. 53–66). Information Age Publishing.
HawkmanA. (2018). Exposing whiteness in the elementary social studies methods classroom: In pursuit of developing antiracist teacher education candidates. In ShearS. BTschidaC. M.BellowsE.BuchananL. B.SaylorE. E. (Eds.), (Re)imagining elementary social studies: A controversial reader (pp. 49–72). Information Age Publishing.
28.
HightshoeS. (1997). Sifting through the sands of time: A simulated archaeological special feature. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 9(3), 28–30.
29.
JournellW. (2009). Using YouTube to teach presidential election propaganda: Twelve representative videos. Social Education, 73(7), 325–329, 362.
30.
JournellW. (2017). Teaching politics in secondary education: Engaging with contentious issues. State University of New York Press.
31.
JournellW.BeesonM.AyersC. (2015). Learning to think politically: Toward more complete disciplinary knowledge in civics and government courses. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(1), 28–67.
32.
KendiI. X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Bold Type Books.
33.
KingL. (2022). Introduction: Social studies, all things race, and racism. In KingL. (Ed.), Racial literacies and social studies: Curriculum, instruction, and learning (pp. vii–xxiii). Teachers College Press.
34.
KingL.VickeryA.CaffreyG. (2018). A pathway to racial literacy: Using the LETS Act Framework to teach controversial issues. Social Education, 82(6), 316–322.
35.
KohlmeierJ.SayeJ. (2019). Examining the relationship between teachers’ discussion facilitation and their students’ reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 176–204.
36.
KornackiS. (2018). The red and the blue: The 1990s and the birth of political tribalism. Harper Collins.
37.
LevinsonM.LevineP. (2013). Taking informed action to engage students in civic life. Social Education, 77(6), 339–341.
38.
LewisJ.AydinA.PowellN. (2016). March book three. Top Shelf Productions.
39.
MannR. (1996). The walls of Jericho: Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Russell, and the struggle for civil rights. Harcourt Brace & Company.
40.
McGarryL. S.StoicovyD. M. (2015). Deliberation and democracy: How historical simulations equip students for civic participation. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 28(2), 9–12.
41.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
NCSS. (2013b). The college, career, and civic life framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Author.
46.
NelsonM. R. (1995). The early years, 1921–1937. Social Education, 59(7), 14–21.
47.
NokesJ. (2019). Teaching history, learning citizenship: Tools for civic engagement. Teachers College Press.
48.
OliverD. W.NewmannF. M. (1992). Teaching public issues in the secondary school classroom. The Social Studies, 83(3), 100–104.
49.
OliverD. W.ShaverJ. P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. Houghton Mifflin Company.
50.
ParkerW. C. (2015). Social studies education ec21. In ParkerW. (Ed.), Social studies today: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3–13). Routledge.
51.
ParkerW. C. (2023). Education for liberal democracy: Using classroom discussion to build knowledge and voice. Teachers College Press.
52.
ParkerW. C.LoJ. C. (2019). From design to deed: A guide to simulating government and politics on the AP platform. In Wright-MaleyC. (Ed.), More like life itself: Simulations as powerful and purposeful social studies (pp. 167–186). Information Age Publishing.
53.
PerlsteinR. (2008). Nixonland: The rise of a president and the fracturing of America. Simon and Schuster.
54.
PetersonM. D. (1987). The great triumvirate: Webster, Clay, and Calhoun. Oxford University Press.
55.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
56.
SeixasP.MortonT. (2012). The big six historical thinking concepts. Nelson College Indigenous.
57.
StoddardJ. D.SwieckiZ.ShafferW. (2019). Behind the curtain: An epistemic design process for democratic media education simulations. In Wright-MaleyC. (Ed.), More like life itself: Simulations as powerful and purposeful social studies (pp. 21–39). Information Age Publishing.
58.
SwanK.GriffinS. (2013). Beating the odds: The college, career, and civic life (C3) Framework for social studies standards. Social Education, 77(6), 317–321.
ThurberT. (2007). Goldwaterism triumphant? Race and the Republican Party, 1965–1968. The Journal of the Historical Society, VII, 349–384.
61.
Van HoverS.HicksD. (2017). Social constructivism and student learning in social studies. In ManfraM. M.BolickC. M. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 270–318). John Wiley & Sons.
62.
VanSledrightB. (2013). Can assessment improve learning? Thoughts on the C3 Framework. Social Education, 77(6), 334–338.
63.
WilliamsM.MoserT. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
64.
WineburgS. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87.
65.
WineburgS. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press.
66.
WineburgS. (2018). Why learn history (when it’s already on your phone). The University of Chicago Press.
