In comparison to the ideal democratic paradigm, wherein leaders attain legitimacy through popular mandate, political figures in the Middle East frequently invoke divine authority, even within ostensibly democratic structures. This prevailing narrative, which has been pervasive over the last two decades, particularly exemplifies the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan administration in Türkiye. Erdoğan’s depiction as the chosen one has significantly contributed to his triumph in the 2023 presidential elections. Political campaign advertisement films have emerged as a critical tool in shaping and reinforcing the perception that he is a divinely chosen leader. This study examines six advertisement films aired by Erdoğan and Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, the presidential candidate of the opposition coalition, during the 2023 Turkish presidential elections. In those films, Erdoğan is portrayed as a traditional leader and as the divinely chosen leader, while Kılıçdaroğlu is depicted as a legal/rational leader and as the harbinger of spring.
AdemilokunMohammed, & OlatejuMoji. (2020). A multimodal discourse analysis of some visual images in the political rally discourse of 2011 electioneering campaigns in Southwestern Nigeria. Language and Semiotic Studies, 6(3), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2020-060304
2.
AlgülHüseyin. (2025). “EMÎN,” [The trustworthy]. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi.
3.
AltermarkNiklas, HadjievskaMilka Ivanovska, & JohanssonHåkan. (2022). Personalization at the top of civil societies? Legitimation claims on civil society elites in Europe. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 25(4), 758–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221129390
4.
BendixReinhard. (1967). Reflections on charismatic leadership. Asian Survey, 7(6), 341–352.
5.
BergströmBo. (2008). Essentials of visual communication. Laurence King Publishing.
6.
CohenEdy. (2020, August27). Why did Erdoğan convert Hagia Sophia into a mosque?BESA. https://besacenter.org/hagia-sophia-mosque-erdogan/
7.
Erdem. (2023, May1). Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu yeni reklam filmi! [Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu’s new commercial!]. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuXhx9NwmTU
8.
EsenBerk, GümüşçüŞebnem, & YavuzyılmazHakan. (2023). Türkiye’nin Yeni Rejimi: Rekabetçi Otoriterlik [Turkey’s new regime: Competitive authoritarianism]. İletişim Yayınları.
9.
Findy News. (2023, May6). AK Parti, Türkiye Sana Emanet adlı reklam filmi hazırladı [The Justice and Development Party has prepared a commercial called Türkiye is Entrusted to You]. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISALLkE3W08
10.
FossSonja K. (2004). Framing the study of visual rhetoric: Toward a transformation of rhetorical theory. In CharlesA. Hill & Marguerite Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
FoucaultMichel. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
12.
KnappMark L., & HallJudith A. (1995). Non-verbal communication: The body and the environment. Paidos Communication.
13.
KundakçıDeniz. (2016). Max Weber. Say Yayınları.
14.
LadkinDonna. (2006). The enchantment of the charismatic leader: Charisma reconsidered as aesthetic encounter. Leadership, 2(2), 165–179.
15.
MichaelsonRuth, & AliFaisal. (2025). Huge protests as Istanbul mayor jailed on day of likely presidential nomination. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/23/istanbul-mayor-ekrem-imamoglu-arrested-pre-trial-detention
MyersGreg. (1994). Words in ads. Oxford University Press.
18.
O’HalloranKay L., TanSabine, SmithBradley A., & PodlasovAlexey. (2009). Digital semiotics. Paper Presented at the 10th World Congress of Semiotics, A Coruna, Spain.
19.
OkAhmet Şenol. (2017). Max Weber’de Otorite ve Meşruiyet Tipolojisi [Typology of authority and legitimacy in Max Weber]. Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics (EJRSE), 4(8), 42–54.
20.
ÖzkalpEnver. (2020). Sosyolojiye Giriş [Introduction to sociology]. Eğitim Sağlık ve Bilimsel Araştırma Çalışmaları Vakfı Yayınları.
21.
PfaffSteven. (2002). Nationalism, charisma, and plebiscitary leadership: The problem of democratization in Max Weber’s political sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 72(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682x.00007
22.
ReyazMohammad, & KhanZeba. (2023). Neo-Ottoman Turk-Scape: Analyzing the role of Dizis as Türkiye’s soft power. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/23477989231181788
23.
TalukdarIndrani. (2015). Turkey: Presidential elections, 2014. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 2(4), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347798915610979
24.
TambiahStanley J. (2018). The sources of charismatic leadership: Max Weber revisited. In Cohen, LissakMoshe, & AlmagorUri (Eds.), Comparative social dynamics. Routledge Press.
25.
TürkH. Bahadır. (2018). Muktedir—Türk Sağ Geleneği ve Recep Tayyip Erdoğan [Mighty—Turkish right tradition and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]. İletişim Yayınları.
26.
WeberMax. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Routledge.
27.
YavuzM. Hakan, & KoçRasim. (2024). Do Turkey’s 2024 local elections signal the end of Erdoğan’s reign?Middle East Policy, 31(95), 107. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12747
