The article examines discrepancies between the Indonesian government’s response to terrorist cyber activities and the actual activities of terrorists online. By analysing data from 55 convicted terrorists, the study reveals that while government efforts focus on censoring extremist content on social media and websites, terrorists have shifted to using messaging platforms for tactical coordination. This shift indicates that current censorship and platform removal strategies are ineffective in preventing terrorists from exploiting cyberspace. The article highlights that repressive measures, such as criminal prosecution and strict regulation, may undermine the roles of users, platform managers and tech companies in content moderation. Additionally, these measures could drive terrorists to smaller, less monitored platforms, ultimately failing to curb their online activities and compromising freedom of expression. The findings suggest that a more nuanced approach is needed to address terrorist use of cyberspace effectively.
AliS. (2022, March25). Countering online radicalisation: Challenges and best practices in CVE efforts in Indonesia. RSIS Webinar on ‘Countering Extremist Content: Promoting Positive Narratives Online’.
2.
Antara News. (2022, March24). Detachment 88 advise people against terrorist contents in social media. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2779897/densus-88-imbau-masyarakat-waspadai-konten-terorisme-di-media-sosial
3.
BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2022). Telecommunication statistics in Indonesia 2022. file:///C:/Users/aliwi/Downloads/statistik-telekomunikasi-indonesia-2022.pdf
4.
BroedersD., CristianoF., & WeggemansD. (2021). Too close for comfort: Cyber terrorism and information security across national policies and international diplomacy. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1928887
5.
CarrollP., & WindleJ. (2018). Cyber as an enabler of terrorism financing, now and in the future. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 13(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2018.1506149
6.
CroninA. K. (2020). Power to the people: How open technological innovation is arming tomorrow’s terrorists. Oxford University Press.
7.
DenningD. (2001). Cyberwarriors: Activists and terrorists turn to cyberspace. Harvard International Review, 23(2), 70.
8.
DenningD. (2007). A view of cyberterrorism five years later. In HimmaK. (Ed.), Internet security: Hacking, counter hacking, and society (pp. 123–140). Jones and Bartlett.
9.
DenningD. E. (2000). Cyberterrorism: Testimony before the special oversight panel on Terrorism Committee on Armed Services US House of Representatives. Focus on Terrorism, 9, 71–76.
10.
Detik.com. (2012). Hacker kelompok teroris dijerat UU pencucian uang. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-2057545/hacker-kelompok-teroris-dijerat-uu-pencucian-uang
11.
East Jakarta District Court. (2018). Decision no. 1037/PID.Sus/2018/PN.JKT.TIM, the verdict of Muhammad Iqbal Ramadhan.
12.
East Jakarta District Court. (2019a). Decision no. 1294/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Jkt.Tim, the verdict of Abdul Latif Fitri Hariyadi ST a.k.a. Adib a.k.a. Abu Umar a.k.a Bambang a.k.a. Kroco bin Lanjar.
13.
East Jakarta District Court. (2019b). Decision No. 1070/Pid/Sus/2019/PN.Jkt.Tim, the verdict of Azmil Khair Simanjuntak aka Abu Halimah.
14.
East Jakarta District Court. (2020a). Decision No. 520/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim, the verdict of Amriadhy a.k.a. Adhy a.k.a. Abu Anisa.
15.
East Jakarta District Court. (2020b). Decision No. 269/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Tim, the verdict of Muhammad Aulia.
16.
East Jakarta District Court. (2022). Decision Number 639/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Tim, the verdict of Moenib Noer Assidaway aka Ustads. Moenib bin Murifan.
17.
FiorettiJ. (2017, June26). Social media giants step up to join fight against extremist content. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-internet-extremism/social-media-giants-step-up-joint-fight-against-extremist-content-idUSKBN19H20A
18.
FitrianiH., & GiriD. S. (2022). The extents and limits of cyber usage terrorist network in Indonesia. Indonesian Quarterly, 50(2), 102–116.
19.
GrahamR. (2016). How terrorists use encryption. CTC Sentinel, 9(6), 21. www.ctc.usma.edu/sentinel/
GrossM. L., CanettiD., & VashdiD. R. (2017). Cyberterrorism: Its effects on psychological well-being, public confidence and political attitudes. Journal of Cybersecurity, 3(1), 49–58.
22.
HaripinM., AnindyaC. R., & PriamarizkiA. (2023). The Indonesian military and counter terrorism in Poso, 2015–2022. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 19(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2290044
23.
HuaJ., & BapnaS. (2012). How can we deter cyber terrorism?Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 21(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2011.647250
24.
HwangJ. C., & SchulzeK. E. (2018). Why they join: Pathways into Indonesian jihadist organizations. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(6), 917. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1481309
Institute for Economics & Peace. (2020). Global terrorism index 2020: Measuring the impact of terrorism. http://visionofhumanity.org/reports
27.
INTRAC/PPATK. (2023). Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis CenterLaporan konsolidasi pengkinian penilaian risiko sektoral tindak pidana pendanaan terorisme pada sektor industri berisiko tinggi tahun 2023. Jakarta: INTRAC/PPATK. https://www.ppatk.go.id/publikasi/read/206/laporan-konsolidasi-pengkinian-penilaian-risiko-sektoral-tindak-pidana-pendanaan-terorisme-pada-sektor-industri-berisiko-tinggi-tahun-2023.html
28.
IslamiN. M., AriantiV., & HuiJ. Y. (2008). The surprise verdict: The proscription of Jemaah Islamiyah. RSIS Commentary, 19.
29.
Jakarta Provincial Court. (2019). Decision No. 334/PID.Sus/2019/PT.DKI, the verdict of Muhamad Okasa a.k.a. Oka a.k.a Abu Fiqh.
30.
Jakarta Provincial Court. (2021). Decision No. 233/PID.SUS/2021/PT DKI, the verdict of Lasmi a.k.a. Umi Sifa.
31.
JarvisL., MacdonaldS., & NouriL. (2014). The cyberterrorism threat: Findings from a survey of researchers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2014.853603
KruglanskiA. W., GunaratnaG., EllenbergM., & SpeckhardA. (2020). Terrorism in time of the pandemic: Exploiting mayhem. Global Security: Health, Science and Policy, 5(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2020.1832903
34.
Mabes Polri. (2023). Daftar terduga teroris dan organisasi teroris Nomor: No. DTTOT/P-13a/3/I/RES.6.1./2023.
35.
MacdonaldS., JarvisL., & LavisS. M. (2022). Cyberterrorism today? Findings from a follow-on survey of researchers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 45(8), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1696444
36.
MagdyW., DarwishK., & WeberI. (2015). #Failedrevolutions: Using Twitter to study the antecedents of ISIS support. Association for the advancement of artificial intelligence. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.02401.pdf
37.
MakarimE. (2010). Cyber terrorism prevention and eradication in Indonesia and role and functions of media. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol7.3.236
38.
Masduki. (2022). Cyber-troops, digital attacks, and media freedom in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(3), 220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2022.2062609
39.
McDowell-SmithA., SpeckhardA., & YaylaA. S. (2017). Beating ISIS in the digital space: Focus testing ISIS defector counter-narrative videos with American college students. Journal for Deradicalization, 1(10). http://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/83.a
40.
Ministry of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia. (2013). TRUST+Positif. https://kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail/3322/TRUST%2BPOSITIF/0/e_business
41.
Ministry of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015). 12 blocked sites have been re-opened. https://m.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/4719/12-situs-yang-diblokir-akhirnya-dibuka-kominfo/0/sorotan_media
42.
Ministry of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Ministry of Information has blocked 814,594 radical sites. https://kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail/5083/Kominfo+Sudah+Blokir+814.594+Situs+Radikal+/0/sorotan_media
43.
MuhammadA., & HiariejE. (2021). Deradicalization program in Indonesia: Radicalizing the radicals. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1905219
44.
NeumannP. R. (2013). Options and strategies for countering online radicalization in the United States. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(6), 431–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2013.784568
45.
North Jakarta District Court. (2020). Decision no. 1323/PID.SUS/2020/PN.JKT.UTR, the verdict of Rahman aka Abdurrahman aka Daeng Loy bin Bengnga.
46.
NurrahmanY. (2016, February26). Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter threatened by government blocking. Tempo. https://tekno.tempo.co/read/748607/facebook-whatsapp-dan-twitterterancam-diblokir-pemerintah
47.
OnatI., BastugM. F., GulerA., & KulaS. (2022). Fears of cyberterrorism, terrorism, and terrorist attacks: An empirical comparison. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 16(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2022.2046625
48.
PermonoP. (2022). Membongkar jaringan terorisme Indonesia semasa pandemi COVID-19. Pustaka Harakatuna.
49.
PermonoP., & SuryanaA. (2023). Terrorism in Indonesia and the perceived oppression of Muslims worldwide. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
50.
PrihadiS. (2015, March31). ISP association: Websites blocking should be decided by the court. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20150331115349-185-43185/apjii-pemblokiran-situs-web-seharusnya-diputuskan-pengadilan
51.
RudnerM. (2017). ‘Electronic Jihad’: The internet as Al Qaeda’s catalyst for global terror. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1157403
52.
SamuelT. K. (2016). Radicalisation in Southeast Asia: A selected case study of Daesh in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines. Pusat Serantau Asia Tenggara Bagi Mencegah Keganasan.
53.
ScrivensR., DaviesG., & FrankR. (2016). Searching for signs of extremism on the web: An introduction to sentiment-based identification of radical authors. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 10(1), 39–59.
54.
SetiawanD. A. (2020). Cyber terrorism and its prevention in Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 27(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20200156
55.
SetyawanA. B. (2020). Mengenal berbagai ‘tools’ yang digunakan para jihadis dalam berkomunikasi. Ruang Ngobrol. https://www.ruangobrol.id/2020/01/15/ulasan/mengenal-berbagai-tools-yang-digunakan-para-jihadis-dalam-berkomunikasi-1/
56.
SofwanR. (2015, April11). Police intelligence chief: Those who don’t protest access blockage are probably the most radical ones. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20150410192609-12-45804/kabaintelkam-kelompok-radikal-mungkin-tak-protes-pemblokiran
57.
StevensT., & NeumannP. (2012). Countering online radicalisation: A strategy for action. International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation. http://ic-sr.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1236768491ICSROnlineRadicalisationReport.pdf
58.
StohlM. (2006). Cyber terrorism: A clear and present danger, the sum of all fears, breaking point or patriot games?Crime, Law & Social Change, 46(4–5), 223–238.
59.
SuhendraI. (2023, November22). Counter-terrorism strategy during election 2024. The Habibie Center National Seminar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZrkD9Lb-Sg&t=3176s
60.
Tech Against Terrorism. (2023). Patterns of online terrorist exploitation. https://26492205.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26492205/260423%20TCAP%20INSIGHTS%20-%20FINAL.pdf
61.
WarfB., & FeketeE. (2016). Relational geographies of cyberterrorism and cyberwar. Space and Polity, 20(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2015.1112113
62.
West Jakarta District Court. (2019). Decision no. 1642/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Jkt.Brt, the verdict of Triyono.
63.
WhyteC. (2023). Cryptoterrorism: Assessing the utility of blockchain technologies for terrorist enterprise. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(7), 1126–1149.
64.
WhyteC., & MazanecB. M. (2023). Understanding cyber warfare: Politics, policy and strategy (pp. 255–257). Routledge.
65.
WibisonoA. A., & MaulanaI. (2022). Indonesia’s response to returning foreign fighters: Network affiliation as basis for risk assessment. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 18(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2022.2037690
66.
ZeigerS. (2019). The future of countering violent extremism. In KfirI. & GriceG. (Eds.), Counterterrorism yearbook 2019 (pp. 96). The Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
