This article examines various theoretical viewpoints, assessing their success in explaining Japan’s current security policy towards China. With a variety of theoretically salient factors in place, including a dynamic balance of power, extant regional institutions, economic interdependence and a highly publicized pacifist identity, Japan’s China policy presents a prime opportunity to test different international relations theories. We review four theories of interest, structural realism, neoliberal institutionalism, liberal interdependence and constructivism, finding limited support for structural realist and constructivist predictions. We then offer a neoclassical realist model, building from a realist foundation but accounting for the influence of state structure, strategic culture and parochial interests of governing elites.
Glaser, C.L. (2010). Rational theory of international politics: The logic of competition and cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
Han, S., & Jianbo, L. (2012). China’s strategic option: Multilateralism and the pursuit of influence. In C.Lee & T.J.Pempel (Eds), Security cooperation in Northeast Asia: Architecture and beyond (pp. 106–123). London: Routledge.
21.
Hirschman, A.O. (1980). National power and the structure of foreign trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ikenberry, G.J. (2011). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
Ikle, F.C. (1971). Every war must end. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Izumikawa, Y. (2010). Explaining Japanese antimilitarism: Normative and realist constraints on Japan’s security policy. International Security, 35(2), 123–160.
Japan Ministry of Defense (2014b). Interim report on the revision of the guidelines for Japan-U.S. defense cooperation. Retrieved 20 October 2014, from http://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_act/anpo/20141008.html
Katzenstein, P.J., & Okawara, N. (2001–2002). Japan, Asian-Pacific security, and the case for analytical eclecticism. International Security, 26(3), 153–185.
Keohane, R.O., & Nye, J.S., Jr. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transitions (2d ed.1989). Boston: Little Brown.
39.
Kennan, G. (1947). The sources of Soviet conduct. Foreign Affairs, 25(4), 566–582.
40.
Kupchan, C. (2012). No one’s world: The West, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Lind, J.M. (2004). Pacifism or passing the buck: Testing theories of Japanese security policy. International Security, 29(1), 92–121.
42.
Makinda, S. (2000). International society and eclecticism in international relations theory. Cooperation and Conflict, 35(2), 205–216. Retrieved 25 March 2015, from Sage Premier.
43.
Manicom, J. (2006). IR theory and Asia’s maritime territorial disputes. Paper presented at Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Newcastle.
PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2014, December7). Position paper of the government of the People’s Republic of China on the matter of jurisdiction in the South China Sea arbitration initiated by the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 15 January 2015, from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1217147.shtml
58.
Pyle, K. (2007). Japan rising: The resurgence of Japanese power and purpose. New York: Public Affairs.
59.
Rathbun, B. (2008). A rose by any other name: Neoclassical realism as the logical and necessary extension of structural realism. Security Studies, 17(2), 294–321.
60.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. Retrieved 10 December 2013, from JSTOR.
61.
Rosecrance, R. (1986). The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.
62.
Samuels, R. (2007). Securing Japan: The current discourse. Journal of Japanese Studies, 33(1), 125–152. Retrieved 22 April 2015, from JSTOR.
63.
Samuels, R. (2007/2008). New fighting power: Japan’s growing maritime capabilities and East Asian security. International Security, 32(3), 84–112.
64.
Shambaugh, D. (2005). China engages Asia: Reshaping the regional order. International Security29(3), 64–99.
65.
Sil, R. (2000). The foundations of eclecticism: The epistemological status of agency, culture, and structure in social theory. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(3), 353–387. Retrieved 30 March 2015, from Sage Premier.
66.
Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. (2010). Analytical eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411–431.
67.
Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. (2011). De-centering, not discarding, the isms: Some friendly amendments. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 481–485.
Tanji, M. (2008). The importance of the dugong case: Constructivist implications of US base relocations in Okinawa for the Asia-Pacific security communities. Paper delivered at Oceanic Conference on International Studies, University of Queensland. Retrieved 18 August 2014, from http://www.polsis.uq.edu.au/OCIS/Tanji.pdf
78.
US Government Accountability Office (US GAO) (2007). Iran sanctions: Impact in furthering U.S. objectives is unclear and should be reviewed, GAO-08-58. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
79.
US State Department (2014, October18). Special briefing: Secretary Kerry’s meeting with Chinese state councilor Yang Jiechi. Retrieved 12 November 2014, from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/10/233142.htm
80.
Walt, S.M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
81.
Waltz, K.N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.
82.
Waltz, K.N. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79.
83.
Waltz, K.N. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security, 25(1), 5–41.
84.
Warrick, J. (2012, 12August). Iran’s nuclear brokers in China. Washington Post, p. A1.
85.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Yonetani, J. (2001). Playing base politics in a global strategic theater: Futenma relocation, the G-8 summit, and Okinawa. Critical Asian Studies, 33(1), 70–95. doi: 10.1080/146727101300094050
90.
Zakaria, F. (1998). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America’s world role. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
91.
Zhou, J. (2010). China’s peaceful rise in a global context: A domestic aspect of China’s roadmap to democratization. Lanham: Lexington Books.
