This article examines the critical role of critical thinking in higher education and the workplace, addressing the perceived deficit in graduates’ skills for tackling professional challenges. It explores the essence of critical thinking, tracing its roots from ancient Greek philosophy to contemporary academic discourse and delineates the characteristics of an ideal critical thinker in the professional sphere. The article proposes a stratified approach to nurturing critical thinking skills in the workplace, tailored to different organizational levels: expert-level critical thinkers, frontline employees and mid-level supervisors. This tiered strategy acknowledges the diverse needs within an organization and the varying depths of critical thinking required for each role. The manuscript emphasizes the importance of balancing domain-general and domain-specific skills in critical thinking development and highlights the need to refine these competencies continuously. By prioritizing critical thinking in both educational institutions and professional environments, we can develop a workforce that is well-prepared to handle complex challenges, make informed decisions and spearhead innovation in an increasingly interconnected world.
AbramiP. C., BernardR. M., BorokhovskiE., WadeA., SurkesM. A., TamimR., & ZhangD. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs.
3.
BailinS., CaseR., CoombsJ. R., & DanielsL. B. (1999). Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183133
4.
BakanJ. (2012). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. Constable.
5.
ByrnesJ. P., & DunbarK. N. (2014). The nature and development of critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0
6.
ClarkeM. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes, and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1923–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152
7.
CrossmanJ. E., & ClarkeM. (2010). International experience and graduate employability: Stakeholder perceptions on the connection. Higher Education, 59(5), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9268-z
8.
De NeysW., & GlumicicT. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106(3), 1248–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002
9.
EricssonK. A., & LehmannA. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 273–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273
10.
EvansJ. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and decision making. InSternbergR. J. & SchoolerJ. W.(Eds.), The psychology of reasoning: Inference and problem solving (pp. 113–138). Psychology Press.
11.
EvansJ. B. T. (2011). Heuristics and biases: A critical look. InKahnemanD. & TverskyA.(Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 389–406). Cambridge University Press.
12.
FacioneP. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
13.
FacioneP. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: Research findings and recommendations. The Delphi report. ERIC Doc No ED 315423. California Academic Press.
14.
FacioneP. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–23.
15.
FacioneP. A., SánchezC. A., FacioneN. C., & GainenJ. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27797240
16.
FiskeS. T., & TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition. McGraw-Hill.
17.
FugelsangJ. A., & DunbarK. N. (2005). Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1204–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.10.012
18.
HalpernD. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
19.
HarrisP. L. (2002). What do children learn from testimony?Cambridge University Press.
20.
HartmanL. P., DesJardinsJ. R., & MacDonaldC. (2015). Business ethics: Decision making for personal integrity and social responsibility. McGraw-Hill Education.
21.
KuhnD. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002016
22.
LiuO. L., FrankelL., & RoohrK. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12009
23.
NorrisS. P., & EnnisR. H. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking. The practitioners’ guide to teaching thinking series. Critical Thinking Press and Software.
24.
NorthouseP. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
25.
PaulR., & ElderL. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
Payan-CarreiraR., Sacau-FontenlaA., RebeloH., SebastiãoL., & PnevmatikosD. (2022). Development and validation of a critical thinking assessment-scale short form. Education Sciences, 12(12), Article 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120938
PnevmatikosD., ChristodoulouP., & GeorgiadouT. (2019). Promoting critical thinking in higher education through values and knowledge education (VaKE) method. Studies in Higher Education, 44, 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586340
30.
PnevmatikosD., ChristodoulouP., GeorgiadouT., LithoxoidouA., DimitriadouC., Payan CarreiraR., SimõesM., FerreiraD., RebeloH., SebastiãoL., AntunesC., DumitruD., LăcătuşM. L., StăiculescuC., PaduraruM. E., ArcimavičienėL., PoštičS., IvancuO., KriaučiūnienėR., … MeindersA. (2021). Think4Jobs training: Critical thinking training packages for higher education instructors and labour market tutors. University of Western Macedonia. https://think4jobs.uowm.gr/results/intellectualoutput2
31.
PnevmatikosD., ChristodoulouP., GeorgiadouTr., & LithoxoidouA. (2023). Undergraduate students’ conceptualization of critical thinking and their ideas for critical thinking acquisition. Education Sciences, 13, Article 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040416
32.
PnevmatikosD., ChristodoulouP., LithoxoidouA., & GeorgiadouT. (2023). Designing critical thinking blended apprenticeships curricula to promote reflective thinking in higher education. InReisA., BarrosoJ., MartinsP., JimoyiannisA., HuangR. Y. M., & HenriquesR.(Eds.), Technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education, TECH-EDU 2022. Communications in computer and information science (Vol. 1720, pp. 316–328). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_24
33.
RebeloH., ChristodoulouP., Payan-CarreiraR., DumitruD., MäkiöE., MäkiöJ., & PnevmatikosD. (2023). University–business collaboration for the design, development, and delivery of critical thinking blended apprenticeships curricula: Lessons learned from a three-year project. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101041
34.
ShehabH. M., & NussbaumE. M. (2015). Cognitive load of critical thinking strategies. Learning and Instruction, 35, 51–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.004
35.
StanovichK. E., & WestR. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
36.
StanovichK. E., WestR. F., & ToplakM. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
37.
SwellerJ. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295e312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
38.
ToplakM. E., WestR. F., & StanovichK. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
39.
UNESCO. (1976). International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). ERIC Clearinghouse.
40.
VosniadouS., PnevmatikosD., MakrisN., LepeniotiD., EikospentakiK., ChountalaA., & KyrianakisG. (2018). The recruitment of shifting and inhibition in on-line science and mathematics tasks. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1860–1886. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12624
WeyringerS., PatryJ. L., PnevmatikosD., & BørhaugF. B. (2022). The VaKE handbook: Theory and practice of values and knowledge education. Brill.
43.
YoungA. G., PowersA., PilgrimL., & ShtulmanA. (2018). Developing a cognitive reflection test for school-age children. In Proceedings of the 40th conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1232–1237).
