Reconceptualizing Professional Learning Within the Gifted Field: Exploring the Instruct to Innovate Model

Abstract

Effective gifted education should incorporate opportunities for gifted students to develop creative and critical thinking along with academic and affective skills. Professional learning (PL) supporting these outcomes is not consistently successful. Therefore, this study pilots a new PL model called Instruct to Innovate (I2I) to support teachers’ efforts in facilitating gifted students’ development. This model integrates the Design Thinking Model and adult learning theories. Teachers participated in a multiphase intervention, including a 2-week PL summer camp with subsequent bimonthly meetings throughout the school year. Teachers’ reflections, captured in focus groups, along with secondary sources of corroborating data were collected. Through qualitative analyses, teachers recognized key design principles (i.e., human-centeredness, bias towards action, collaborative nature, and mindfulness of the process) within the PL model, their practice, and their students. These findings provide initial evidence that this approach may support educators’ efforts as they provide powerful learning experiences for gifted students.

Keywords

professional development creative problem solving teacher education gifted education critical thinking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

(2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura

(2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In Smith

K. G.

Hitt

M. A.

(Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford University Press.

Beasley

J. G.

Briggs

Pennington

(2017). A tool and technique to analyze and evaluate advanced academic curricular units. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516675902

Beghetto

R. A.

(2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29(4), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554421

Bogdan

R. C.

Biklen

S. K.

(2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Pearson.

Brighton

C. M.

Hertberg

H. L.

Moon

T. R.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Callahan

C. M.

(2005). The feasibility of high-end learning in a diverse middle school. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Brown

(2009). Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. HarperCollins.

Carroll

Goldman

Britos

Koh

Royalty

Hornstein

(2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01632.x

10.

Cross

T. L.

(2017). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children: Factors and issues in their psychological development (5th ed.). Prufrock Press.

11.

Darling-Hammond

Hyler

M. E.

Gardner

(2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

12.

Desimone

L. M.

(2011). A primer on effective professional development. Kappan Magazine, 92(6), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200616

13.

Desimone

L. M.

Porter

A. C.

Garet

M. S.

Yoon

K. S.

Birman

B. F.

(2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.

14.

d.school. (2010). Thinking bootleg. Stanford University d.school. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg

15.

Eyal

Roth

(2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055

16.

Firmender

J. M.

Reis

S. M.

Sweeny

S. M.

(2013). Reading comprehension and fluency levels ranges across diverse classrooms: The need for differentiated reading instruction and content. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460084

17.

Fletcher

Speirs Neumeister

K. L.

(2012). Research on perfectionism and achievement motivation: Implications for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 668–677.

18.

Fraser-Seeto

Howard

S. J.

Woodcock

(2015). An investigation of teachers’ awareness and willingness to engage with a self-directed professional development package on gifted and talented education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1–14.

19.

Galdone

(1970). The three little pigs. Houghton Mifflin/Clarion Books.

20.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.

21.

Guskey

T. R.

(1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005

22.

Hayes

L. L.

Robnolt

V. J.

(2006). Data-driven professional development: The professional development plan for a reading excellence act school. Literacy Research and Instruction, 46(2), 95–119.

23.

Isaksen

S. G.

Dorval

K. B.

Treffinger

D. J.

(2000). Creative approaches to problem solving (2nd ed.). Kendall/Hunt.

24.

Jacob

McGovern

(2015). The mirage: Confronting the hard truth about our question for teacher development. The New Teacher Project. https://tntp.org/assets/documents/TNTP-Mirage_2015.pdf

25.

Kaplan

S. N.

(1986). The Grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In Renzulli

J. S.

(Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 180–193). Creative Learning Press.

26.

Knowles

M. S.

(1984). Adult learning: Theory and practice. In Nadler

(Ed.), The handbook of human resource development (pp. 6.1–6.23). John Wiley.

27.

Knowles

M. S.

Holton

III Swanson

(2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Elsevier.

28.

Köppen

Meinel

(2015). Empathy via design thinking: Creation of sense and knowledge. In Plattner

Meinel

Leifer

(Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 15–28). Springer.

29.

Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. The Professional Learning Association.

30.

Loveless

Parkas

Duffett

(2008). High-Achieving students in the era of NCLB. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

31.

Martin

(2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage (3rd ed.). Harvard Business Review.

32.

McCoach

D. B.

Siegle

(2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–254.

33.

McHugh

M. L.

(2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.

34.

Medical Research Council. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions.

35.

Merriam

S. B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). Jossey Bass.

36.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2015). 2014-2015 State of the states in gifted education: Policy and practice data. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/key%20reports/2014-2015%20State%20of%20the%20States%20(final).pdf

37.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2019). 2019 pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards. http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/Intro%202019%20Programming%20Standards.pdf

38.

Newell

Simon

H. A.

(1972). Human problem solving. Prentice Hall.

39.

Onchwari

Keengwe

(2008). The impact of a mentor-coaching model on teacher professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0233-0

40.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative problem solving’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Vol. V). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-V.pdf

41.

Parnes

S. J.

(1967). Creative behavior guidebook. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

42.

Paul

Elder

(2010). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

43.

Pawson

(2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978184920912

44.

Peters

S. J.

Engerrand

K. G.

(2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171.

45.

Peters

S. J.

Jolly

J. L.

(2018). The influence of professional development in gifted education on the frequency of instructional practices. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(4), 473–491.

46.

Peters

S. J.

Rambo-Hernandez

Makel

M. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Plucker

J. A.

(2017). Should millions of students take a gap year? Large numbers of students start the school year above grade level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701834

47.

Plucker

J. A.

Hardesty

Burroughs

(2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Center for Education Policy Analysis, University of Connecticut. http://cepa.uconn.edu/mindthegap

48.

Rambo-Hernandez

K. E.

McCoach

D. B.

(2015). High-achieving and average students’ reading growth: Contrasting school and summer trajectories. Journal of Educational Research, 108(2), 112–129.

49.

Rauth

Köppen

Jobst

Meinel

(2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e012/b3bf809a5151ed4f9e4a6bc20d4ab222ea43.pdf?_ga=2.203492624.1449443208.1592348033-1575250414.1592348033

50.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2001). Enriching curriculum for all students. Skylight Professional Development.

51.

Richardson

(2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308400515

52.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Callan

G. L.

Ridgley

L. M.

(2018). Anchoring the creative process within a self-regulated learning framework: Inspiring assessment methods and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 921–945.

53.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Ridgley

L. M.

Callan

G. L.

Karami

Ehlinger

(2018). How teachers perceive factors that influence creativity development: Applying a social cognitive theory perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308400515

54.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2016). Facilitating and hindering motivation, learning, and well-being in schools: Research and observations from self-determination theory. In Wentzel

K. R.

Miele

D. B.

(Eds.), Handbook on motivation at schools (pp. 96–119). Routledge.

55.

Sagoe

(2012). Precincts and prospects in the use of focus groups in social and behavioral science research. The Qualitative Report, 17(15), 1–16.

56.

Sawyer

R. K.

(2012). The science of human innovation: Explaining creativity (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

57.

Schacter

Thum

Y. M.

Zifkin

(2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01266.x

58.

Scheer

Noweski

Meinel

(2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 1360–1431.

59.

Shively

Stith

K. M.

Rubenstein

L. D.

(2018). Measuring what matters: Assessing creativity, critical thinking, and the design process. Gifted Child Today, 41(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518768361

60.

Speare

(1983). The sign of the beaver. Houghton Mifflin.

61.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

62.

Ten Cate

O. T. J.

Kusurkar

R. A.

Williams

G. C.

(2011). How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE Guide No. 59. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 961–973. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435

63.

Thirsk

L. M.

Clark

A. M.

(2017). Using qualitative research for complex interventions: The contributions of hermeneutics. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917721068

64.

Timperley

Kaser

Halbert

(2014). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral of inquiry (Vol. 234). Centre for Strategic Education.

65.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Kaplan

Renzulli

Purcell

J. H.

Leppein

J. H.

Burns

D. E.

Strickland

C. A.

Imbeau

M. B.

(2009). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop learner potential and challenge advanced learners (2nd ed.). Corwin.

66.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Murphy

(2015). Leading for differentiation: Growing teachers who grow kids. ASCD.

67.

Treffinger

D. J.

Isaksen

S. G.

Stead-Dorval

K. B.

(2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th ed.). Prufrock Press.

68.

Treffinger

D. J.

Solomon

Woythal

(2012). Four decades of creative vision: Insights from an evaluation of the Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI). Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 209–219. https://https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.14

69.

Van Tassel-Baska

. (1986). Effective curriculum and instruction models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 164–169. https://https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306323

70.

Van Tassel-Baska

Stambaugh

. (2008). Curriculum and instructional considerations in programs for the gifted. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

(Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 347–365). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_18

71.

Wallas

(2014). The art of thought. Solis Press. (Original work published in 1926)

72.

Walton

(2014). Teachers as expert learners and fellow travelers: A review of professional development practices for problem-based learning. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(2), 67–92.

73.

Ward

V. S.

(1961). Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach. Merrill.

74.

Xiang

Dahlin

Cronin

Theaker

Durant

(2011). Do high flyers maintain their altitude? Performance trends of top students. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524344.pdf

75.

Yoon

K. S.

Duncan

Lee

S. W. Y.

Scarloss

Shapley

K. L.

(2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers, REL 2007-No. 033). Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.