In India, the inequality in education from the perspective of first-generation learners has drawn little attention. So there is an urgent need to pay attention on the issue of how robust is the effect of first generation in causing educational inequality as the first-generation students are typically confronted with the dynamics of caste-based inequality in addition to their deficiency in the cultural and social capital. In this context, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the rationale behind first- and non-first-generation students’ entry into higher education and factors which influence their decision. Methodology of the present study involves a mixed method approach, and data have been collected from the sample of 400 first-year students from Jammu and Kashmir State of India which comprises 200 first- and 200 non-first-generation students. Self-structured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews have been used for data collection. Factor analysis and independent sample t-test have been used for analysis purpose. Findings of study highlight that perceived family influence, relative functionalism, self-efficacy and significant others to be less powerful factors affecting their pursuit of higher education than non-first-generation students.
AllattP. (1993). Becoming privileged. The role of family processes. In BatesI.RiseboroughG. (Eds), Youth and inequality (pp. 139–159). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
2.
AndersonD. C.BowmanS. L. (1991). Assessing the college knowledge of first-generation and second-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 32(2), 116–122.
3.
AuclairR.BélangerP.DorayP.GallienM.GroleauA.MasonL.MercierP. (2008). First-generation students: A promising concept? (Transitions–Research Paper 2). Montreal: The Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation.
AyalaC.StriplinA. (2002). A career introduction model for first-generation college freshmen students. Retrieved 21November2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED469996.pdf
6.
BairdL. L. (1976). Structuring the environment to improve outcomes (New Directions for Higher Education, pp. 1–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BerknerL.ChavezL. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates (Report No. NCES 98-105). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
8.
BhagavatheeswarnL. (2016). The barriers and enablers to education among scheduled caste and scheduled tribe adolescent girls in Northern Karnataka, South India: A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Management, 49, 262–270.
9.
BilsonJ. M.TerryM. B. (1982). In search of the silken purse: Factors in attrition among first-generation students. College and University, 58(1), 57–75.
10.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction, In KarabelJ.HalseyA. H. (Eds), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
British Council. (2014). Understanding India. The future of higher education and opportunities for international cooperation. London: British Council.
13.
BryanT. H.BryanJ. H. (1981). Some personal and social experiences of learning disabled children. Advances in Special Education, 3, 147–186.
14.
BryanE.SimmonsL. (2009). Family involvement: Impacts on post-secondary educational success for first-generation Appalachian college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 391–406.
15.
CabreraA. F.NasaS. M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America’s disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 119–150.
16.
CejaM. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as information sources in the college selection process of chicana students. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 87–104.
17.
ChemersM. M.HuL.GarciaB. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64.
18.
ChenX.CarrollC. D. (2005). First-generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts (Report No. NCES 2005-171, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED485756). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
19.
ChoyS. P. (2001). Findings from the condition of education 2001: Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (NCES 2001–126). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
20.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
21.
CollierP. J.MorganD. L. (2008). Is that paper really due today? Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425–446.
22.
ConleyD. T. (2008). Rethinking college readiness. New England Journal of Higher Education, 22(5), 24–26.
23.
DevadasonR. (2006). Class, ethnicity and individualisation: Young adult narratives of transition in two European cities. Journal of Education and Work, 19(2), 153–169.
24.
DumaisS. A.WardA. (2010). Cultural capital and first-generation college success. Poetics, 38(3), 245–265.
25.
EdingtonE. D.KoehlerL. (1987). Rural student achievement: Elements for consideration (ERIC Digest, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289 658). Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
EthingtonC. A.SmartJ. C. (1986). Persistence to graduate education. Research in Higher Education, 24(3), 287–303.
28.
FallonM. (1997). The school counsellor’s role in first generation students’ college plans. School Counselor, 44(5), 384–394.
29.
FouadN. A.SmithP. L. (1996). A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 43(3), 338–346.
30.
GandaraP.BialD. (2001). Paving the way to postsecondary education: K-12 intervention programs for underrepresented youth. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
31.
GibbonsM. M.BordersL. D. (2010). Prospective first-generation college students: A social-cognitive perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 58(3), 194–208.
32.
HallinanM. T.WilliamsR. A. (1990). Students’ characteristics and the peer-influence process. Sociology of Education, 63(2), 122–132.
33.
HamptonN. Z.MasonE. (2003). Learning disabilities, gender, sources of self-efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 41(2), 101–112.
34.
HarrisS. (2009). Factors Influencing the Pursuit of Higher Education Questionnaire (Unpublished manuscript). Troy University.
35.
HornL.NuñezA. M. (2000). Mapping the road to college: First-generation students’ math track, planning strategies, and context of support. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
HosslerD.GallagherK. (1987). Student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62(3), 207–221.
37.
HosslerD.SchmitJ.VesperN. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
IssacP. D.MalaneyG. D.KarrasJ. E. (1992). Parental educational level, gender differences, and seniors’ aspirations for advanced study. Research in Higher Education, 33(5), 595–606.
39.
JehangirR. R. (2010). Higher education and first generation students: Cultivating community, voice, and place for the new majority. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
JenkinsA. L.MiyazakiY.JanosikS. M. (2009). Predictors that distinguish first generation college students from non-first generation college students. Journal of Multicultural, Gender and Minority Studies, 3(1), 1–9.
41.
KallioR. E. (1995). Factors influencing the college choice decisions of graduate students. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 109–124.
42.
KalmijnM.KraaykampG. (1996). Race, cultural capital, and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 22–34.
43.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.NotaL.SoresiS. (2003). Testing social cognitive interest and choice hypotheses across Holland types in Italian high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 101–118.
44.
MalaneyG. D.IsaacP. D. (1988). The immediate post-baccalaureate educational plans of outstanding Undergraduates. College and University, 63, 148–161.
45.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
46.
MehtaA.HasanR. (2006). Under-representation of disadvantaged classes in colleges: What do the data tell us?Economic and Political Weekly, 41(35), 3731–3796.
47.
NautaM. M.EppersonD. L. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the social-cognitive model applied to high school girls’ choices of nontraditional college majors and aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 448–457.
48.
NúñezA.CrispG. (2012). Ethnic diversity and Latino/a college access: A comparison of Mexican American and Puerto Rican beginning college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(2), 78–95.
49.
NunezA.Cuccaro-AlaminS. (1998). First-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education (NCES 98-082). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
50.
OldfieldK. (2007). Humble and hopeful: Welcoming first-generation poor and working-class students to college. About Campus, 11(6), 2–12.
51.
PajaresF.SchunkD. H. (2001). Self-belief and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In RidingR.RaynS. (Eds), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.
Parul. (2014). Disparity in higher education: The contexts of scheduled castes in Indian society. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 2(4), 35–42.
54.
Planning Commission. (2007). Towards faster and more inclusive growth: An approach to the 11th Five Year Plan. New Delhi: Government of India.
55.
Planning Commission. (2012). Twelfth Five Year Plan 2012–2017: Faster, More inclusive and sustainable growth. New Delhi: Government of India.
56.
PurswellK. E.YazedjianA.ToewsM. L. (2008). Students’ intentions and social support as predictors of self-reported academic behaviors: A comparison of first and continuing-generation college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(2), 191–206.
57.
ReayD. (1998). Always knowing and never being sure: Institutional and familial habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 519–529.
58.
ReayD.DavidM.BallS. (2005). Degrees of choice: Social class, race and gender in higher education. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books
59.
RushiP. J. (2007). Questioning the utility of self-efficacy measurements for Indians. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(2), 193–206.
60.
SamargeS. P. (2006). Creating a college culture at the elementary school level (PhD Dissertation). Los Angeles: University of California.
61.
SchultzP. F. (2004). Upon entering college: First semester experiences of first-generation, rural students from agricultural families. Rural Educator, 26(1), 48–51.
62.
SmithW. L.ZhangP. (2010). The impact of key factors on the transition from high school to college among first- and second-generation students. Journal of First Year Experience and Student Transition, 22(2), 49–70.
63.
SpieglerT.BednarekA. (2013). First-generation students: what we ask, what we know and what it means: An international review of the state of research. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 23(4), 318–337.
64.
JohnE. P.St.SomersP. A. (1993). Assessing the impact of financial aid offers on enrollment decisions. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 23(3), 7–12.
65.
Stanton-SalazarR. D.DornbuschS. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68(2), 116–135.
66.
StriplinJ. J.(1999). Facilitating transfer for first-generation students: Undergraduates whose parents never enrolled in postsecondary education. Eric Digests. Retrieved 21November2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED430627.pdf
67.
SuriK. (2014). Challenges in education of tribal children in Poonch district of Jammu and Kashmir. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 142–145.
68.
TerenziniP. T.SpringerL.YaegerP. M.PascarellaE. T.NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1–22.
69.
ThayerP. B. (2000). Retention of students from first generation and low income backgrounds (ERIC ED446633). Washington, DC: Department of Education.
70.
TilakJ. B. G. (2015). How inclusive is higher education in India?Social Change, 45(2), 185–223.
71.
VargasJ. H. (2004). College knowledge: Addressing information barriers to college. Boston, MA: College Access Services, The Education Resources Institute (TERI).
72.
VargheeseN. V. (2015). Challenges of massification of higher education in India (CPRHE Research Paper). New Delhi: NUEPA.
73.
VargheeseN. V. (Ed.). (2009). The diversification of postsecondary education. International Institute of Educational Planning. ISBN: 978-92-803-1370-3. Retrieved 11November2016, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002269/226981e.pdf
74.
VargheeseN. V.MalikG. (Eds). (2016). India higher education report 2015. New Delhi: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138121171
75.
VelluR. (2015). Designing a qualitative and flexible case study to investigate the opportunities and challenges for primary education offered to first generation learners in a rural community in the state of Maharashtra, India. Support for Learning, 30(3), 223–238.
76.
VolleK.FedericoA. (1997). Missed opportunities: A new look at disadvantaged college aspirants. Washington, DC: The Education Resources Institute and The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
77.
WarburtonE.BugarinR.NunezA. M. (2001). Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and post secondary success of first generation college students. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
78.
WardL.SiegelM. J.ZebulunD. (2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment to commencement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79.
WeitenW.LloydM. A. (2000). Psychology applied to modern life. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson.
