Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The literature on first-generation college students largely focuses on the challenges and barriers they may experience in college. Yet, we do not have a clear understanding of who these students are as learners. To address this gap, this systematic review examines how scholars study and conceptualize first-generation college students as learners. We found the majority of the literature we reviewed conceptualized them as learners based on their academic performance and the influence of cultures on their learning. These two conceptualizations positioned first-generation college students against normative ways of learning, and in doing so promulgate an assimilation approach in higher education. We found a smaller body of literature that conceptualized first-generation college students as learners whose lived experiences, when connected to academic content, can contribute to their academic learning, advancement of disciplines, self-growth, and community development. We use this alternative view to provide recommendations for studying and working with first-generation college students.

Keywords

first-generation college students learners academic learning academic achievement higher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Allen

J. M.

Muragishi

G. A.

Smith

J. L.

Thoman

D. B.

Brown

E. R.

(2015). To grab and to hold: Cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first-generation college students’ science interest. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000046

Antony

J. S.

(2002). Reexamining doctoral student socialization and professional development: Moving beyond the congruence and assimilation orientation. In Smart

J. C.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 349–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0245-5_8

*Atherton

M. C.

(2014). Academic preparedness of first-generation college students: Different perspectives. Journal of College Student Development, 55(8), 824–829. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0081

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

*Bass

M. B.

Halverson

E. R.

(2012). Representation radio: Digital art-making as transformative pedagogical practice in the college classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.715740

*Beattie

I. R.

Thiele

(2016). Connecting in class? College class size and inequality in academic social capital. Journal of Higher Education, 87(3), 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777405

Bensimon

E. M.

(2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.00321

Bensimon

E. M.

(2018). Reclaiming racial justice in equity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(3–4), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1509623

Bourdieu

(1986). Forms of capital. In Richardson

J. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education ( Nice

, Trans., pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

10.

Bui

K. V. T.

(2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experiences. College Student Journal, 36(1), 3–11.

11.

Bui

Rush

R. A.

(2016). Parental involvement in middle school predicting college attendance for first-generation students. Education, 136(4), 473–489.

12.

Burns

(2013). “Who do you think you are?” A multidimensional analysis of the impact of disparities in higher educational attainment within families of first-generation college graduates (Accession Order No. 3553017) [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

13.

*Castillo-Montoya

(2017). Deepening understanding of prior knowledge: What diverse first-generation college students in the U.S. can teach us. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1273208

14.

Castillo-Montoya

(2018). Rigor revisited: Scaffolding college student learning by incorporating their lived experiences. New Directions for Higher Education, 2018(181), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20269

15.

Castillo-Montoya

(2019). Professors’ pedagogical strategies for teaching through diversity. Review of Higher Education, 43(Suppl. 2019), 199–226. http://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0050

16.

Castillo-Montoya

Ives

(forthcoming, December 2019). A liberating education: Integrating funds of knowledge and disciplinary knowledge to create tools for students’ lives. In Culver

K. C.

Trolian

T. L.

(Eds.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Effective Instruction in College Classrooms: Research-Based Approaches to College and University Teaching. Medford, MA: Wiley.

17.

*Castillo-Montoya

Reyes

(2018). Learning Latinidad: The role of a Latino cultural center service-learning course in Latino identity inquiry and sociopolitical capacity. Journal of Latinos and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2018.1480374

18.

*Castillo-Montoya

Torres-Guzmán

M. E.

(2012). Thriving in our identity and in the academy: Latina epistemology as a core resource. Harvard Educational Review, 82(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.4.k483005r768821n5

19.

Chapman

Fitterer

J. E.

Young

(2016). A study of best practices to establish a college-going culture in Tennessee’s large, urban high schools (Accession Order No. 10247034) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

20.

*Chavez

M. A.

(2015). Community college journeys of Hispanic ESL women. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2013.795506

21.

Chen

(2005). First-generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts (NCES 2005-171). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005171.pdf

22.

Collins

P. H.

(2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203900055

23.

*Conley

P. A.

Hamlin

M. L.

(2009). Justice-learning: Exploring the efficacy with low-income, first-generation college students. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(1), 47–58. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0016.104

24.

Covarrubias

Romero

Trivelli

(2015). Family achievement guilt and mental well-being of college students. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(7), 2031–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0003-8

25.

*Craft DeFreitas

Rinn

. (2013). Academic achievement in first generation college students: The role of academic self-concept. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 57–67. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/2161

26.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf

27.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

28.

Crisp

Taggart

Nora

(2015). Undergraduate Latina/o students: A systematic review of research identifying factors contributing to academic success outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551064

29.

Davies

Rizk

(2018). The three generations of cultural capital research: A narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 331–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317748423

30.

Delgado Bernal

. (2006). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The Mestiza consciousness of Chicana studies. In Delgado Bernal

Elenes

C. A.

Godinez

Villenas

(Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 113–132). State University of New York Press.

31.

Delima

D. G.

(2019). Making a case for a funds of knowledge approach to teaching and learning for first-generation college students. College Teaching, 67(4), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1630355

32.

*Dika

S. L.

D’Amico

M. M.

(2016). Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21301

33.

Dika

S. L.

Singh

(2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072001031

34.

Dowd

A. C.

Bensimon

E. M.

(2015). Engaging the “race question”: Accountability and equity in U.S. higher education. Teachers College Press.

35.

Dowd

A. C.

Sawatzky

Korn

(2011). Theoretical foundations and a research agenda to validate measures of intercultural effort. Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0033

36.

Dunbar

Hossler

Shapiro

Chen

Martin

Torres

Zerquera

Zinskin

(2011). National postsecondary enrollment trends: Before, during, and after the Great Recession (Signature Report). National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. http://pas.indiana.edu/pdf/National%20Postsecondary%20Enrollment%20Trends.pdf

37.

*Eddy

S. L.

Hogan

K. A.

(2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

38.

*Elliott

D. C.

(2014). Trailblazing: Exploring first-generation college students’ self-efficacy beliefs and academic adjustment. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 26(2), 29–49. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1047354

39.

Esmonde

(2017). Power and sociocultural theories of learning. In Esmonde

Booker

A. N.

(Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 6–27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685762

40.

Esmonde

Booker

A. N.

(Eds.). (2017). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685762

41.

Evans

(2013). The stories of successful, first-generation, female, African American college graduates (Accession Order No. 3557962) [Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

42.

*Faulkner

Burdenski

T. K.

Jr. (2011). Empowering lower-income developmental math students to satisfy Glasser’s five basic needs. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy, 31(1), 128–142. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-24138-015

43.

Forrest Cataldi

Bennett

C. T.

Chen

. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and postbachelor’s outcomes (NCES 2018-421). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018421.pdf

44.

Freire

(2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed ( Ramos

M. B.

, Trans., 30th anniversary ed.). Continuum International. (Original work published 1970)

45.

Gillborn

(2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500132346

46.

*Gillian-Daniel

D. L.

Kraemer

S. B.

(2015). Faculty development to address the achievement gap. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(6), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2015.1089757

47.

*Glass

C. R.

Gesing

Hales

Cong

(2017). Faculty as bridge to co-curricular engagement and community for first-generation international students. Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1293877

48.

Godsoe

(2018). Science posse: The importance of the cohort in normalizing academic challenge. In Rodini

A. C.

Richards

B. N.

Simon

N. P.

(Eds.), Clearing the path for first-generation college students: Qualitative and intersectional studies of education mobility (pp. 285–318). Lexington Books.

49.

González

Moll

L. C.

Amanti

(Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum.

50.

Greenhalgh

Peacock

(2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal, 331(7524), 1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68

51.

Guiffrida

D. A.

(2006). Toward a cultural advancement of Tinto’s theory. Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0031

52.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

Rogoff

(2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x032005019

53.

Gutiérrez

(2012). Embracing Nepantla: Rethinking “knowledge” and its use in mathematics Teaching. REDIMAT: Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–56. http://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/redimat/article/view/191

54.

Gutiérrez

(2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037

55.

*Hao

R. N.

(2011). Critical compassionate pedagogy and the teacher’s role in first-generation student success. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 127, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.460

56.

*Harackiewicz

J. M.

Canning

E. A.

Tibbetts

Giffen

C. J.

Blair

S. S.

Rouse

D. I.

Hyde

J. S.

(2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034679

57.

*Harackiewicz

J. M.

Canning

E. A.

Tibbetts

Priniski

S. J.

Hyde

J. S.

(2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075

58.

Harris

J. C.

Patton

L. D.

(2019). Un/Doing intersectionality through higher education research. Journal of Higher Education, 90(3), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1536936

59.

Hawker

Payne

Kerr

Hardey

Powell

(2002). Appraising the evidence: Reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research, 12(9), 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238251

60.

*Hicks

Wood

J. L.

(2016). What do we know about diverse college students in STEM? A meta-synthesis of academic and social characteristic studies. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2016-0018

61.

Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, Subpart 2; 402A. 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 et seq (1965). U.S. Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/trio/triohea.pdf

62.

*Horowitz

(2017). First-generation college students: How to recognize them and be their ally and advocate. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(6), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_06_8

63.

Hudley

Moschetti

Gonzalez

Cho

Barry

Kelly

(2009). College freshmen’s perceptions of their high school experiences. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(3), 438–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000304

64.

Ishitani

T. T.

(2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 433–449. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/10.1023/A:1024284932709

65.

*Jackson

M. C.

Galvez

Landa

Buonora

Thoman

D. B.

(2016). Science that matters: The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(42), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067

66.

*Jehangir

(2009). Cultivating voice: First-generation students seek full academic citizenship in multicultural learning communities. Innovative Higher Education, 34(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9089-5

67.

*Jehangir

(2010). Stories as knowledge: Bringing the lived experience of first-generation college students into the academy. Urban Education, 45(4), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085910372352

68.

*Jehangir

Williams

R. D.

Jeske

(2012). The influence of multicultural learning communities on the intrapersonal development of first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0035

69.

*Jehangir

Williams

R. D.

Pete

(2011). Multicultural learning communities: Vehicles for developing self-authorship in first-generation college students. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 23(1), 53–74. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ952033

70.

*Kim

Y. K.

Sax

L. J.

(2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x

71.

Kiyama

J. M.

(2010). College aspirations and imitations: The role of educational ideologies and funds of knowledge in Mexican American families. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 330–356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209357468

72.

Kiyama

J. M.

Rios-Aguilar

(Eds.). (2018). Funds of knowledge in higher education: Honoring students’ cultural experiences and resources as strengths. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315447322

73.

Ladson-Billings

(1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

74.

Lanham

Liu

(2019, September 23). Not just a typographical change: Why Brookings is capitalizing Black. Brookings Institute. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/brookingscapitalizesblack/

75.

Lee

C. D.

(2017). Foreward: Critical learning opportunities for the learning sciences. In Esmonde

Booker

A. N.

(Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. vii-xii). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685762

76.

*Lipp

Jones

B. A.

(2010/2011). Bilingual Hispanic and Southeast Asian students’ challenges in a freshman history course. CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 64–86. http://www.catesoljournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CJ22_lipp.pdf

77.

Littell

J. H.

Corcoran

Pillai

(2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press.

78.

*Longwell-Grice

Longwell-Grice

(2008). Testing Tinto: How do retention theories work for first-generation, working-class students? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.4.a

79.

*Majer

J. M.

(2009). Self-efficacy and academic success among ethnically diverse first-generation community college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(4), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017852

80.

*Maltby

J. L.

Brooks

Horton

Morgan

(2016). Long term benefits for women in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematical living-learning community. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 4(1). https://washingtoncenter.evergreen.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1108&context=lcrpjournal

81.

Marciano

J. E.

(2016). “We’re friends, we have to be in this together”: Examining the role of culturally relevant peer interactions in urban youth’s college readiness and access. Urban Review, 49(1), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0387-4

82.

*McKay

V. C.

Estrella

(2008). First-generation student success: The role of faculty interactions in service learning courses. Communication Education, 57(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520801966123

83.

*McMurray

A. J.

Sorrells

(2009). Bridging the gap: Reaching first-generation students in the classrooms. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(3), 210–214. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ952270

84.

*Morales

E. E.

(2012). Learning as liberation: How liberal arts education transforms first-generation/low socio-economic college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 13(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.4.e

85.

*Morales

E. E.

(2014). Learning from success: How original research on academic resilience informs what college faculty can do to increase the retention of low socioeconomic status students. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p92

86.

Nasir

N. S.

Hand

V. M.

(2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004449

87.

*Nosaka

Novak

(2014). Against the odds: The impact of the key communities at Colorado State University on retention and graduation for historically underrepresented students. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 2(2), Article 3. https://washingtoncenter.evergreen.edu/lcrpjournal/vol2/iss2/3/

88.

Neumann

(2005). Observations: Taking seriously the topic of learning in studies of faculty work and careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 102, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.197

89.

Neumann

(2014). Staking a claim on learning: What we should know about learning in higher education and why. Review of Higher Education, 37(2), 249–267. https://doi10.1353/rhe.2014.0003

90.

*Nuñez

(2011). Counterspaces and connections in college transitions: First-generation Latino students’ perspectives on Chicano studies. Journal of College Student Development, 52(6), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2011.0077

91.

Olson

(2004). The abolition of white democracy. Minneapolis, MS: University of Minnesota Press.

92.

*Olson

J. S.

(2017). Helping first-year students get grit: The impact of intentional assignments on the development of grit, tenacity, and perseverance. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 29(1), 99–118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1139399

93.

Pascarella

E. T.

Pierson

C. T.

Wolniak

G. C.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2004). First generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256

94.

Patton

L. D.

Njoku

N. R.

(2019). Theorizing Black women’s experiences with institution-sanctioned violence: A #BlackLivesMatter imperative toward Black liberation on campus. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(9), 1162–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1645908

95.

*Pelco

L. E.

Ball

C. T.

Lockeman

K. S.

(2014). Student growth from service-learning: A comparison of first-generation and non-first-generation college students. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(2), 49–66. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/1114

96.

The Pell Institute. (2016). Indicators of higher education equity in the United States: 2016 historical trend report. University of Pennsylvania. http://www.pellinstitute.org/downloads/publications-Indicators_of_Higher_Education_Equity_in_the_US_2016_Historical_Trend_Report.pdf

97.

Petticrew

Roberts

(2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

98.

Redford

Hoyer

K. M.

(2017). First-generation and continuing-generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences (NCES 2018-009). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018009.pdf

99.

Rendón

L. I.

Jalomo

R. E.

Nora

(2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In Braxton

J. M.

(Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127–156). Vanderbilt University Press.

100.

Reyes

(2012). Proving them wrong: Academically resilient first generation Latinas in college (Accession Order No. 3521375) [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest.

101.

Rodini

A. C.

Richards

B. N.

Simon

N. P.

(Eds.). (2018). Clearing the path for first-generation college students: Qualitative and intersectional studies of educational mobility. Lexington Books.

102.

*Rodriguez

G. G.

Buczinsky

(2013). Linking classes: Learning communities, “high” culture, and the working class student. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 1(2). https://washingtoncenter.evergreen.edu/lcrpjournal/vol1/iss2/6/

103.

Sablan

J. R.

Tierney

W. G.

(2014). The changing nature of cultural capital. In Paulsen

M. B.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 29, pp. 153–188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_4

104.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

105.

*Schademan

A. R.

Thompson

M. R.

(2016). Are college faculty and first-generation, low-income students ready for each other? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115584748

106.

*Schmid

M. E.

Gillian-Daniel

D. L.

Kraemer

Kueppers

(2016). Promoting student academic achievement through faculty development about inclusive teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(5), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1227672

107.

Sharpe

(2017, November 3). Are you first gen? Depends on who’s asking. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/education/edlife/first-generation-college-admissions.html

108.

*Slate

J. R.

LaPrairie

Schulte

D. P.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2009). A mixed analysis of college students’ best and poorest college professors. Issues in Educational Research, 19(1), 61–78. http://www.iier.org.au/iier19/slate.pdf

109.

*Smith

J. M.

Lucena

J. C.

(2016). Invisible innovators: How low-income, first-generation students use their funds of knowledge to belong in engineering. Engineering Studies, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2016.1155593

110.

*Soria

K. M.

Stebleton

M. J.

(2012). First-generation students’ academic engagement and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.666735

111.

Stanley

C. A.

(2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X06298008

112.

Stebleton

M. J.

Soria

K. M.

Huesman

R. L.

Jr. (2014). First-generation students’ sense of belonging, mental health, and use of counseling services at public research universities. Journal of College Counseling, 17, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00044.x

113.

*Stephens

N. M.

Fryberg

S. A.

Markus

H. R.

Johnson

C. S.

Covarrubias

(2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143

114.

*Stephens

N. M.

Hamedani

M. G.

Destin

(2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518349

115.

Suri

Clarke

(2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349

116.

Teranishi

Lok

Nguyen

B. M. D.

(2013). iCount: A data quality movement for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in higher education. Educational Testing Service. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573772.pdf

117.

Thomas

O’Mara-Eves

Harden

Newman

(2012). Synthesis methods for combining and configuring textual or mixed methods data. In Gough

Oliver

Thomas

(Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (pp. 181–210). Sage.

118.

*Tibbetts

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Canning

E. A.

Boston

J. S.

Priniski

S. J.

Hyde

J. S.

(2016). Affirming independence: Exploring mechanisms underlying a values affirmation intervention for first-generation students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000049

119.

*Tibbetts

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Priniski

S. J.

Canning

E. A.

(2016). Broadening participation in the life sciences with social-psychological interventions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0001

120.

Tierney

W. G.

(1999). Models of minority college-going and retention: Cultural integrity versus cultural suicide. Journal of Negro Education, 68(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2668211

121.

Tinto

(1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

122.

Toutkoushian

R. K.

Stollberg

R. A.

Slaton

K. A.

(2018). Talking ‘bout my generation: Defining “first-generation college students” in higher education research. Teachers College Record, 120(4), 1–38.

123.

*Trammell

B. A.

Aldrich

R. S.

(2016). Undergraduate students’ perspectives of essential instructor qualities. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19178

124.

*Trevino

N. N.

Craft DeFreitas

(2014). The relationship between intrinsic motivation and academic achievement for first generation Latino college students. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9245-3

125.

*Tsai

(2012). Coursework-related information horizons of first-generation college students. Information Research, 17(4), Article 542. http://www.informationr.net/ir/17-4/paper542.html#.W50JxZNKjBI

126.

U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Fast facts report for the student support services program. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/triostudsupp/sss-fastfacts2016.pdf

127.

*Vuong

Brown-Welty

Tracz

(2010). The effects of self-efficacy on academic success of first-generation college sophomore students. Journal of College Student Development, 51(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0109

128.

*Wang

T. R.

(2014). Formational turning points in the transition to college: Understanding how communication events shape first-generation students’ pedagogical and interpersonal relationships with their college teachers. Communication Education, 63(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.841970

129.

Ward

Siegel

M. J.

Davenport

(2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment to commencement. Jossey-Bass.

130.

Warikoo

Carter

(2009). Cultural explanations for racial and ethnic stratification in academic achievement: A call for a new and improved theory. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 336–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326162

131.

*White

J. W.

(2011). Resistance to classroom participation: Minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole class discussion. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10(4), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.598128

132.

*Wilson

R. E.

Kittleson

(2013). Science as a classed and gendered endeavor: Persistence of two white female first-generation college students within an undergraduate science context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 802–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21087

133.

Winkle-Wagner

(2010). Cultural capital: The uses and abuses of a key theoretical concept in educational research. ASHE Higher Education Report Series, 36(1). Jossey-Bass.

134.

Winkle-Wagner

McCoy

D. L.

(2016). Entering the (postgraduate) field: Underrepresented students’ acquisition of cultural and social capital in graduate school preparation programs. Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777399

135.

*Wirt

L. G.

Jaeger

A. J.

(2014). Seeking to understand faculty-student interaction at community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(11), 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.725388

136.

*Yee

(2016). The unwritten rules of engagement: Social class differences in undergraduates’ academic strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 87(6), 831–858. https://doi/10.1353/jhe.2016.0031

137.

*Yeh

T. L.

(2010). Service-learning and persistence of low-income, first-generation college students: An exploratory study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 50–65. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0016.204

138.

Yosso

T. J.

(2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

First-Generation College Students as Academic Learners: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material