Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12-25
Exploring the significance of traumatic events on the individual characteristics of political leaders: A case study of Putin’s leadership style and the Russian opposition protests
This study explores how traumatic events influence decision-making and policy changes, focusing on the individual traits of political leaders. Specifically, it examines the impact of the 2011 Russian opposition protests on Vladimir Putin’s leadership and foreign policy decisions. Using Leadership Trait Analysis (LTA), the study evaluates how this event shaped Putin’s leadership traits and policy approach. The research addresses three key questions: (1) Were the protests a traumatic event for Putin? (2) How does LTA explain foreign policy decision-making? (3) Do traumatic events lead to more offensive foreign policy behaviour? By integrating empirical, methodological, and theoretical perspectives, the study assesses the interplay between situational crises, leadership traits, and political outcomes. Findings suggest that the 2011 protests were a traumatic event for Putin, significantly influencing his leadership style and decision-making process. The study demonstrates that LTA effectively explains how traumatic experiences shape foreign policy behaviour. Furthermore, it reveals that such events can lead to more assertive or offensive foreign policy actions, as reflected in Putin’s subsequent policies. This research highlights the critical role of trauma in shaping leadership traits and political behaviour, contributing to a deeper understanding of leadership psychology and foreign policy in contemporary Russia.
AtwalMBaconE (2012) The youth movement Nashi: contentious politics, civil society, and party politics. East European Politics28(3): 256–266.
2.
BalciAEfeİ (2021) Exogenous dynamics and leadership traits: a study of change in the personality traits of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace10(2): 149–164.
3.
BBC (2011) Ответ Путину: мнение митинговавших на Болотной. BBC.
4.
BBC (2011) Medvedev rejects Putin ‘crusade’ remark over Libya. BBC.
5.
BeltonC (2020) Putin’s People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took on the West. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
6.
BremmerISamuelC (2007) The siloviki in Putin’s Russia: who they are and what they want. The Washington Quarterly30(1): 83–92.
7.
CasteelPJ (2024) Vladimir Putin’s leadership traits over 11 years: a longitudinal study of Putin’s third term in office using leadership trait analysis.
8.
CuhadarEKaarboJKesginB, et al. (2017) Examining leaders’ orientations to structural constraints: Turkey’s 1991 and 2003 Iraq war decisions. Journal of International Relations and Development20(1): 29–54.
9.
De HaasM (2010) Russia’s Foreign Security Policy in the 21st Century: Putin, Medvedev and Beyond. Routledge.
10.
DylanHGioeDVGrossfeldE (2023) The autocrat’s intelligence paradox: Vladimir Putin’s (mis)management of Russian strategic assessment in the Ukraine war. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations25(3): 385–404.
11.
DysonSB (2006) Personality and foreign policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis2(3): 289–306.
EtkindA (2022) Alexey Navalny: a hero of the new time. New Perspectives30(1): 19–26.
14.
GeniniD (2025) Countering hybrid threats: how NATO must adapt (again) after the war in Ukraine. New Perspectives33(2): 122–149.
15.
GoldmanSD (2008) Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and US Interests. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
16.
GötzE (2022) Near abroad: Russia’s role in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Europe-Asia Studies74(9): 1529–1550.
17.
HallinK (2023) Leader trait analysis of Vladimir Putin: a translation studies approach to personality scores in translated English to Russian speech. New Perspectives31(3): 223–249.
18.
HermannCF (1990) Changing course: when governments choose to redirect foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly34(1): 3–21.
19.
HermannMG (2002) Political psychology as a perspective in the study of politics. Political Psychology23(1): 43–60.
20.
HermannMG (2003) William Jefferson Clinton’s leadership style. The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders: With Profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton. Jerrold M.Post. University of Michigan Press, 313–329.
21.
HillF (2015) How Vladimir Putin’s worldview shapes Russian foreign policy. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Ideas, Domestic Politics, and External Relations. David Cadier, Margot Light. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 42–61.
22.
HosakaS (2019) Welcome to Surkov’s theater: Russian political technology in the Donbas war. Nationalities Papers47(5): 750–773.
23.
KaarboJLantisJS (2024) Executives and foreign policy. The Oxford Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis. Oxford University Press, 323.
24.
MäkinenSirke (2011) Surkovian narrative on the future of Russia: making Russia a world leader. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics.
25.
MessinaKE (2024) Observations, knowledge, and speculation: what we know and don’t know about Vladimir Putin. A Psychoanalytic Study of Political Leadership in the United States and Russia. Karyne E. Messina. Routledge, 29–58.
26.
MonaghanAC (2012) The End of the PuTin Era?Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
27.
PaceMBilgicA (2018) Trauma, emotions, and memory in world politics: the case of the European Union’s foreign policy in the Middle East conflict. Political Psychology39(3): 503–517.
28.
PacerVA (2016) Russian Foreign Policy Under Dmitry Medvedev, 2008-2012. Routledge.
29.
PolianskiiM (2024) Inside Vladimir Putin’s hall of mirrors: how the Kremlin’s miscalculation of Western resolve emboldened Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Nationalities Papers6: 1–19.
Putin (2021) On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians. On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians.
32.
RiveraDWRiveraSW (2018) The militarization of the Russian elite under Putin: what we know, what we think we know (but don’t), and what we need to know. Problems of Post-Communism65(4): 221–232.
33.
RochlitzM (2019) The return of the siloviki: an introduction. Russian Politics4(4): 493–498.
34.
TichýL (2014) Security and foreign policy of Dmitry Medvedev in the period 2008–2012. Journal of Slavic Military Studies27(4): 533–552.
35.
TsygankovAP (2014) Russia has an inferiority complex, America has a superiority complex. Russia in Global Affairs.
36.
WalkerSGSchaferM (2006) Structural international relations theories and the future of operational code analysis. Beliefs and Leadership in World Politics. Springer, 237–248.
37.
WilligenNBakker (2021) Policy documents and the beliefs of foreign policy decision-makers: a next step in operational code analysis. Operational Code Analysis and Foreign Policy Roles. Routledge, 111–128.
38.
WilligenNVBakkerFE (2021) Trauma and belief systems: an operational code analysis of Dutch prime minister Rutte and the downing of flight MH17. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy12(2): 215–233.
39.
Yarhi-MiloK (2018) Who Fights for Reputation: The Psychology of Leaders in International Conflict. Princeton University Press.
40.
YoungM (2024) Textual assessment of leaders individual differences: exploring TALID. University at Albany, State University of New York University at Albany, State University of New York.
